[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: New meaning of the term "Sputnik"
- From: Craig Barnes <craigbarnes85@...>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 22:12:14 +0100
On 25 July 2012 14:56, Dirk Laurie <dirk.laurie@gmail.com> wrote:
> It's only carrying on for lack of something better, so that we don't have
> nothing at all on lua-l. Give us another topic!
>
"When a program has nothing surprising to say, it should say nothing."
-- Eric S. Raymond
I like to apply this rule to most other things too.
- References:
- New meaning of the term "Sputnik", Jeff Pohlmeyer
- Re: New meaning of the term "Sputnik", Dimiter 'malkia' Stanev
- Re: New meaning of the term "Sputnik", Michael Shalayeff
- Re: New meaning of the term "Sputnik", M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
- Re: New meaning of the term "Sputnik", Yuri Takhteyev
- Re: New meaning of the term "Sputnik", Leo Razoumov
- Re: New meaning of the term "Sputnik", KHMan
- Re: New meaning of the term "Sputnik", M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
- Re: New meaning of the term "Sputnik", Laurent FAILLIE
- Re: New meaning of the term "Sputnik", liam mail
- Re: New meaning of the term "Sputnik", Paul Hudson
- Re: New meaning of the term "Sputnik", Dirk Laurie
