Re: how to prevent bugs without static type checking?

[Javier Guerra Giraldez <javier@...>]

On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 1:23 AM, steve donovan
<steve.j.donovan@gmail.com> wrote:
> As an example of different language culture, Ruby tolerates
> duck-typing and so people get into messes which are hard to reason
> about. Lua people are much more reluctant to do that, even though it's
> trivial to redefine string.match say.

don't you mean monkey-patching?  zoology can be hard!  ;-)

-- 
Javier