[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Sorry to ask this, license question
- From: Coda Highland <chighland@...>
- Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2013 10:57:55 -0800
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Marc Balmer <marc@msys.ch> wrote:
>
> Am 07.01.2013 um 19:45 schrieb Patrick <patrick@spellingbeewinnars.org>:
>
>>
>>> "
>>> And this is the rabbit hole that the OP was afraid we'd go down. :-) "
>>
>>
>> Indeed
>>
>> I don't want to cause trouble. It seems that it is certainly not clear to dynamically link to GPL code from GPL incompatible licenses so i won't do it.
>
> that is clear. you link to GPL code, statically or dnyamically, and our program becomes subject to the GPL.
>
On the other hand, if there are GPL and non-GPL libraries that provide
the same interface, the program is only GPL when it's using (or being
distributed with) the GPL library, and it can be non-GPL for just the
source code with no libraries or when using the non-GPL library. (Or
it can still be GPL, if the code's author wants it to be GPL and the
non-GPL library's license is compatible.)
/s/ Adam
- References:
- Sorry to ask this, license question, Patrick
- Re: Sorry to ask this, license question, Javier Guerra Giraldez
- Re: Sorry to ask this, license question, Xavier Wang
- Re: Sorry to ask this, license question, Chris Babcock
- Re: Sorry to ask this, license question, Patrick
- Re: Sorry to ask this, license question, Marc Balmer