[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Alternative to ~= for inequality?
- From: Elias Barrionovo <elias.tandel@...>
- Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 12:39:59 -0200
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Michael Richter <ttmrichter@gmail.com> wrote:
> Allow me to summarize this "debate" so we cease speaking in endless circles:
> "The way I learnt things is self-evidently superior for logical reasons that
> are so OBVIOUS that I can't explain them."
>
> There. We've just cut through about 99.44% of language debates.
BTW, today's XKCD awesomely fits this thread: http://xkcd.com/1172
--
NI!
- References:
- Alternative to ~= for inequality?, colinz
- Re: Alternative to ~= for inequality?, Robert Virding
- Re: Alternative to ~= for inequality?, sergei karhof
- Re: Alternative to ~= for inequality?, Joseph Manning
- Re: Alternative to ~= for inequality?, Ross Bencina
- Re: Alternative to ~= for inequality?, Joseph Manning
- Re: Alternative to ~= for inequality?, Miles Bader
- Re: Alternative to ~= for inequality?, Steve Litt
- Re: Alternative to ~= for inequality?, Miles Bader
- Re: Alternative to ~= for inequality?, Dirk Laurie
- Re: Alternative to ~= for inequality?, Michael Richter