[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Proposal: smartlua
- From: Andrew Starks <andrew.starks@...>
- Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 20:06:40 -0500
On Mar 11, 2013, at 19:58, Sean Conner <sean@conman.org> wrote:
>
> I've come to the conclusion that while it might sound like a good idea
> (either changing require() or adding a loader to package.loaders[]), in
> practice, it probably won't be a good idea.
>
> -spc (Just my two zorkmids worth ... )
>
>
Yeah... Some kind of "I-tried-that-already" table in a config file for
NETLOADER, but then you need a way to tell it to try again.
truth is that there probably is a legitimate use case for this, but
I'm not all that positive that I've personally seen it.
-Andrew
- References:
- Re: Proposal: smartlua, steve donovan
- Re: Proposal: smartlua, Peter Drahoš
- Re: Proposal: smartlua, steve donovan
- Re: Proposal: smartlua, Steve Litt
- Re: Proposal: smartlua, marbux
- Re: Proposal: smartlua, steve donovan
- Re: Proposal: smartlua, mchalkley
- Re: Proposal: smartlua, Peter Drahoš
- Re: Proposal: smartlua, Michal Kottman
- Re: Proposal: smartlua, Andrew Starks
- Re: Proposal: smartlua, Sean Conner