Re: I call bullshit

[Coda Highland <chighland@...>]

On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Greg Lewin <greg.lewin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I think you are right - I may have misinterpreted :
>
> "> prove to us you have the chops to prove a computer program
> mathematically.
>
> I've done that, and quite extensively. It's a research topic I have engaged
> in."
>
> ...
>
> However, the whole tone of his posts is decidedly manic and delusional.
>
>
>
> On 28 April 2013 17:05, Rena <hyperhacker@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 2013-04-28 11:36 AM, "Greg Lewin" <greg.lewin@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delusion
>> >
>> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delusional_disorder
>> >
>> > talk of solving the Halting Problem could be a clue.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On 28 April 2013 16:11, Rena <hyperhacker@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On 2013-04-27 4:44 PM, "Stefan Reich"
>> >> <stefan.reich.maker.of.eye@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > ...on this list.
>> >> >
>> >> > It's not MY problem. It's not my ideas. It's not the way I present
>> >> > them. It's not my character. You can't blame it on my anymore. You just
>> >> > can't.
>> >>
>> >> It is the way you present your ideas. You come in saying you have some
>> >> big idea, to do something that sounds impossible, but you never explain how
>> >> you intend to achieve these goals. For example, you mentioned a shell that
>> >> sounds impossibly smart, and claim to have mathematical proof that it works,
>> >> but you haven't shown that proof, any code, or any explanation of how it
>> >> works. What are we supposed to do with a project we know nothing about?
>> >
>> >
>>
>> I didn't see him claim to have solved that himself... People just seem to
>> have assumed his alleged proof involves it. Though without seeing it, I
>> guess assumptions are all we have.
>
>

Whether or not the subject is a troll, there's no reason to be
stooping to namecalling and ad hominem attacks. Let's show some
maturity here.

/s/ Adam