[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: pairs(t, skey) and ipairs(t, skey)
- From: Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo <lhf@...>
- Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 10:51:44 -0300
> It's too bad that the tone was over the top and unnecessarily disrespectful.
I'm sure Tim meant no offense. None was taken by me.
The # operator for tables remain a source of confusion for users.
I wish it was different but there it is.
- References:
- Re: pairs(t, skey) and ipairs(t, skey), Dirk Laurie
- Re: pairs(t, skey) and ipairs(t, skey), Paul K
- Re: pairs(t, skey) and ipairs(t, skey), Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
- Re: pairs(t, skey) and ipairs(t, skey), Tim Hill
- Re: pairs(t, skey) and ipairs(t, skey), Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
- Re: pairs(t, skey) and ipairs(t, skey), Tim Hill
- pairs(t, skey) and ipairs(t, skey), Andrew Starks
