[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: luaL_error() documented with [-0, +0, v], should be [-0, +1, v] ?
- From: Carsten Fuchs <carsten.fuchs@...>
- Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2013 21:53:59 +0200
Am 2013-10-07 21:28, schrieb Carsten Fuchs:
I was wondering if the reference documentation of the various
luaL_...error() functions shouldn't be changed to say [-0, +1, v] instead?
Uh oh... I think this (the negation in "shouldn't") is bad English, if not utterly wrong?
What I meant to say was:
I was wondering if the reference documentation of the various luaL_...error() functions
should say [-0, +1, v] instead?
;-)
Best regards,
Carsten
--
Cafu - the open-source game and graphics engine for multiplayer 3D action
http://www.cafu.de
- Prev by Date:
luaL_error() documented with [-0, +0, v], should be [-0, +1, v] ?
- Next by Date:
Re: luaL_error() documented with [-0, +0, v], should be [-0, +1, v] ?
- Previous by thread:
luaL_error() documented with [-0, +0, v], should be [-0, +1, v] ?
- Next by thread:
Re: luaL_error() documented with [-0, +0, v], should be [-0, +1, v] ?
- Index(es):