Re: nanomsg binding?

["Pierre Chapuis" <catwell@...>]

> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Andrew Starks <andrew.starks@trms.com>
> wrote:

> Wheel reinvention continues, although heaven knows I'm cool with more &
> merrier.

Currently thinking about what exactly I will say at the Workshop,
and this topic in particular. I think it's a bit sad to see such
wheel reinvention.

I can understand that different bindings can have different goals,
but at least we should try to agree on a reasonable interface and
make them interchangeable.

Regarding nanomsg, I had written a binding for LuaJIT in its early
days and found out somebody else had as well. So we merged and the
binding is now under the official nanomsg project on GitHub:
https://github.com/nanomsg/luajit-nanomsg

I really don't think a library still very unstable should have that
many bindings.

-- 
Pierre Chapuis