Re: C++ integration / DSEL alternative questions

[steve donovan <steve.j.donovan@...>]

On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Moose <moose@posteo.de> wrote:
> The executable itself is in my case a unit test that links against the dll
> that exposes the functions. The executable itself does not expose anything.
> Microsofts dependency walker shows that the DLL exposes the C functions all
> right. After all, it works when I explicitly load() the DLL.

Then it should work.  I agree, if you have LuaJIT you may as well use
the FFI because it is faster and less work to set up.  But, are these
functions exported as "extern "C"" - because C++ mangling will mess up
the names.  Look to see what the function names actually are.

But, if that's not working, then it will be a LuaJIT specific question.