[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers
- From: Coroutines <coroutines@...>
- Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 07:17:32 -0700
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 7:12 AM, Coda Highland <chighland@gmail.com> wrote:
> It's called "slippery slope", by analogy that once you get started
> down a hill covered in ice you can't stop and go back.
If you made 2 big metal '?' and turned them sideways you'd have ice
picks to grapple back up that ice-hill. '!' could also be used for
pittons. Really I'm most in favor of adding those 2 -- I would like
to see @ used in the names of methods that return copies which
reference all or parts of the former `self', but that is not as
important as denoting which methods are booleans and which are
self-modifying (imo).
- References:
- Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers, Coroutines
- Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers, Dirk Laurie
- Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers, Coroutines
- Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers, Coda Highland
- Prev by Date:
Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers
- Next by Date:
Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers
- Previous by thread:
Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers
- Next by thread:
Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers
- Index(es):