[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Locking Table Member Additions
- From: steve donovan <steve.j.donovan@...>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 14:54:11 +0200
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Paige DePol <lual@serfnet.org> wrote:
> In my experience Debug builds have always been bulkier than Release builds, but that is the trade-off for having useful debug information available when developing code! :)
Totally! And if space is not an issue, I certainly appreciate getting
a sensible stack trace when a server falls over - especially if it's a
once-in-a-blue-moon problem.
For embedded devices, those fewer bytes/faster load will often be
important. (Personally I prefer not writing programs that have to fit
in matchboxes, but matchboxes have to be programmed and it's a noble
profession.)
- References:
- Locking Table Member Additions, Leinen, Rick
- RE: Locking Table Member Additions, Leinen, Rick
- Re: Locking Table Member Additions, Sean Conner
- Re: Locking Table Member Additions, Tom N Harris
- RE: Locking Table Member Additions, Leinen, Rick
- Re: Locking Table Member Additions, Sean Conner
- Re: Locking Table Member Additions, Paige DePol
- Re: Locking Table Member Additions, Thomas Jericke
- Re: Locking Table Member Additions, Paige DePol
- Re: Locking Table Member Additions, Thomas Jericke
- Re: Locking Table Member Additions, Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: Locking Table Member Additions, Paige DePol