[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Why do we have ipairs?
- From: Coda Highland <chighland@...>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 18:19:07 -0700
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 4:04 PM, Sean Conner <sean@conman.org> wrote:
>> It's soooo much easier to analyze and comprehend the flow of control in a
>> simple series of adjoining statements than it is across a series of function
>> calls, especially recursive calls.
>
> I'll grant you it can feel wierd at first, seeing a bunch of functions all
> call each other and not blow out the stack, but with exposure, you get used
> to it. Heck, people got used to Perl, for crying out loud.
<smug lisp weenie>I was recursing before it was cool.</smug lisp weenie>
/s/ Adam
- References:
- Re: Why do we have ipairs?, Thiago L.
- Re: Why do we have ipairs?, Axel Kittenberger
- Re: Why do we have ipairs?, Jay Carlson
- Re: Why do we have ipairs?, Axel Kittenberger
- Re: Why do we have ipairs?, Andrew Starks
- Re: Why do we have ipairs?, Axel Kittenberger
- Re: Why do we have ipairs?, Paige DePol
- Re: Why do we have ipairs?, William Ahern
- Re: Why do we have ipairs?, Sean Conner
- Re: Why do we have ipairs?, William Ahern
- Re: Why do we have ipairs?, Sean Conner