lua-l archive
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
] [
Date Index
] [
Thread Index
]
Subject
:
[OT] Interesting answer to why dynamic languages are hard for large code bases
From
: Andrew Starks <andrew.starks@
...
>
Date
: Tue, 1 Jul 2014 08:08:51 -0500
http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/221615/why-do-dynamic-languages-make-it-more-difficult-to-maintain-large-codebases
Told from the perspective of _javascript_, but most of it applies to Lua, as well.
-Andrew
Follow-Ups
:
Re: [OT] Interesting answer to why dynamic languages are hard for large code bases
,
David Demelier
Re: [OT] Interesting answer to why dynamic languages are hard for large code bases
,
Marc Balmer
Re: [OT] Interesting answer to why dynamic languages are hard for large code bases
,
steve donovan
Prev by Date:
Re: lua 5.2.3 on FreeBSD 10 no shared library
Next by Date:
Re: [OT] Interesting answer to why dynamic languages are hard for large code bases
Previous by thread:
Re: lua 5.2.3 on FreeBSD 10 no shared library
Next by thread:
Re: [OT] Interesting answer to why dynamic languages are hard for large code bases
Index(es):
Date
Thread