[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: metatables for strings?
- From: Hisham <h@...>
- Date: Wed, 6 May 2015 13:27:49 -0300
On 6 May 2015 at 13:13, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
<lhf@tecgraf.puc-rio.br> wrote:
>> >> PS. I still like syntax "hello":sub(1, 4)
>
>> I always wondered: is there a reason why this syntax is not supported?
>
> Because to allow it in general would require unbounded lookahead.
> Consider for instance:
> "x".."x".."x".."x".."x".."x".."x".."x".."x".."x".."x":sub(1, 4)
It would? I would assume that : binds tighter than .., as in:
Lua 5.3.0 Copyright (C) 1994-2015 Lua.org, PUC-Rio
> function f(s) return s:upper() end
> f "hello" .. "world"
HELLOworld
>
> The current solution with parentheses solves this and is fully general.
> It's probaly easy to allow just this syntax <string literal> : <function call>,
> but not general enough.
But it is just as general as `f "hello"`, isn't it?
To clarify, I wasn't asking about `:` on arbitrary expressions, only
on string literals.
-- Hisham
- References:
- metatables for strings?, Sam Putman
- Re: metatables for strings?, Nagaev Boris
- Re: metatables for strings?, Sam Putman
- Re: metatables for strings?, Sam Putman
- Re: metatables for strings?, Dirk Laurie
- Re: metatables for strings?, Nagaev Boris
- Re: metatables for strings?, Sam Putman
- Re: metatables for strings?, Nagaev Boris
- Re: metatables for strings?, Dirk Laurie
- Re: metatables for strings?, Hisham
- Re: metatables for strings?, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo