[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: string.dump(f, true) does not work as expected
- From: Roberto Ierusalimschy <roberto@...>
- Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 15:25:51 -0300
> Not commenting on string.dump giving different results but on retaining
> some debug info.
> Is this (not stripping all info) a bug indeed or should the wording in the
> manual be changed?
>
> Currently, it says [1] that "... the binary representation is created
> without debug information about the function (local variable names, lines,
> etc.)."
That sounds nitpicking, but we could change the wording in the
manual. After all, nowhere there is a definition of what is "debug
information". The whole idea of that option is to save space, not to
give you privacy or anything like that. (It should be be a bug if for
some reason it decides to keep all debug information.)
-- Roberto
- References:
- string.dump(f, true) does not work as expected, Egor Skriptunoff
- Re: string.dump(f, true) does not work as expected, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
- Re: string.dump(f, true) does not work as expected, Egor Skriptunoff
- Re: string.dump(f, true) does not work as expected, Brigham Toskin
- Re: string.dump(f, true) does not work as expected, Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: string.dump(f, true) does not work as expected, Ignacio Burgueño