[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: A rant about backward-incompatible changes
- From: Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo <lhf@...>
- Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 13:21:25 -0300
> The thing to remember here is that in Lua's versioning scheme x.y.z, the
> y is the major version, and the z the minor...
Not quite:
The releases of Lua are numbered x.y.z,
where x.y is the version and z is the release.
http://www.lua.org/versions.html#numbering
- References:
- Re: A rant about backward-incompatible changes, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
- Re: A rant about backward-incompatible changes, Simon Cozens
- Re: A rant about backward-incompatible changes, Rob Kendrick
- Re: A rant about backward-incompatible changes, Simon Cozens
- Re: A rant about backward-incompatible changes, Coda Highland
- Re: A rant about backward-incompatible changes, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
- Re: A rant about backward-incompatible changes, Simon Cozens
- Re: A rant about backward-incompatible changes, Daniel Silverstone
- Re: A rant about backward-incompatible changes, Simon Cozens
- Re: A rant about backward-incompatible changes, Rob Kendrick