 |
lua-l archive |
|
|
||
|
On 8 Sep 2015 13:46, "Dirk Laurie" <dirk.laurie@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> 2015-09-08 14:38 GMT+02:00 Hisham <hisham.hm@gmail.com>:
> >
> > On Sep 8, 2015 8:36 AM, "Dirk Laurie" <dirk.laurie@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> 2015-09-05 22:34 GMT+02:00 Hisham <h@hisham.hm>:
> >>
> >> > A suggestion: make Git tags for your releases, as in
> >> > git tag v1.0.2
> >> > git push --tags
> >> >
> >> > So you can specify them in rockspecs for a given version:
> >> >
> >> > source = {
> >> > url = "" href="http://github.com/dlaurie/xtable">github.com/dlaurie/xtable",
> >> > tag = "v1.0.2",
> >> > }
> >> >
> >> > When uploading to the luarocks.org server using
> >> > luarocks upload xtable-1.0.2-1.rockspec
> >> > it will generate a .src.rock file containing the code for that
> >> > specific tag (the end user does not need to have git installed). You
> >> > could use a download URL for your .zip file, but having Git tags for
> >> > releases is a good idea as it lets users browse the code for specific
> >> > releases online on Github more easily.
> >>
> >> I'm not yet ready for either uploading to the server or
> >> making a tag but anybody wishing to test out the current
> >> version can install it using Luarocks on the attached rockspec
> >> (almost identical to the one Philipp provided).
> >>
> >> Main differences between 1.0.2 and 1.0-4:
> >>
> >> 1. Note the hyphen: LuaRocks naming convention in effect.
> >
> > This should be 1.0.4-1 (that is, if you're skipping 1.0.3). "1.0.4" is the
> > program version, and the "-1" suffix is the rockspec revision. The idea is
> > that you increment the revision if you submit a fixed rockspec that points
> > to the same code.
>
> The program version, as far as I am concerned, is 1.0.
> There is absolutely no functionality that was not present
> three years ago.
>
> Dirk
Because you are just adding a rockspec now it will not be an issue.
Were a 1.0.2 version already present, that would be rightly considered by Luarocks as more recent than 1.0-4.
Stefano