[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [ANN] Lift 0.1 looking for early adopters
- From: Peter Aronoff <telemachus@...>
- Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 15:55:07 -0500
On Thursday, February 18, 2016 at 02:50PM, Tim Caswell wrote:
> So the killer features of lit that I'm not willing to part with are:
>
> - relative imports for intra-package modules.
> - scoped package installs (npm style) (vs global paths)
> - a content-addressable based sync system for downloading and publishing
> files.
> - trivially deployed proxy servers or private repositories.
>
> I would love for there to be one package system for lua in the future.
> Lit isn't there yet and these are places where I find luarocks lacking.
I believe that LuaRocks can do npm-style scoped installs:
http://leafo.net/guides/customizing-the-luarocks-tree.html
I don't know much about npm, so the LuaRocks way of doing things may be
different, but the general idea seems to be possible.
P
--
We have not been faced with the need to satisfy someone else's
requirements, and for this freedom we are grateful.
Dennis Ritchie and Ken Thompson, The UNIX Time-Sharing System
- References:
- [ANN] Lift 0.1 looking for early adopters, Thiago Bastos
- Re: [ANN] Lift 0.1 looking for early adopters, Nagaev Boris
- Re: [ANN] Lift 0.1 looking for early adopters, Thiago Bastos
- Re: [ANN] Lift 0.1 looking for early adopters, Nagaev Boris
- Re: [ANN] Lift 0.1 looking for early adopters, Thiago Bastos
- Re: [ANN] Lift 0.1 looking for early adopters, Tim Caswell
- Re: [ANN] Lift 0.1 looking for early adopters, Thiago Bastos
- Re: [ANN] Lift 0.1 looking for early adopters, Hisham
- Re: [ANN] Lift 0.1 looking for early adopters, Thiago Bastos
- Re: [ANN] Lift 0.1 looking for early adopters, Tim Caswell