[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: 'table' as fallback for tables
- From: Coda Highland <chighland@...>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 10:15:48 -0700
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Roberto Ierusalimschy
<roberto@inf.puc-rio.br> wrote:
>> I find this particular whirlpool to be substantially more relevant
>> than many of the oft-rehashed debates on lua-l. The outcome doesn't
>> impact me PERSONALLY because I don't have any code that relies on the
>> behavior of nils in tables (I don't remember if I even use #t in my
>> code without going and looking; my use case doesn't even need linear
>> sequences because everything's a map), but I think that finding a
>> satisfying resolution to what is widely considered to be a wart would
>> be good for everyone.
>
> +1! (The only missing detail is a satisfying resolution :-)
>
> -- Roberto
>
Heh, yes, that thought went through my mind as I was writing it as well.
It's a little telling that you're chipping into the discussion. :)
/s/ Adam
- References:
- Re: 'table' as fallback for tables, Philipp Janda
- Re: 'table' as fallback for tables, Coda Highland
- Re: 'table' as fallback for tables, Jay
- Re: 'table' as fallback for tables, Tim Hill
- Re: 'table' as fallback for tables, Philipp Janda
- Re: 'table' as fallback for tables, Tim Hill
- Re: 'table' as fallback for tables, Adrián Pérez de Castro
- Re: 'table' as fallback for tables, Andrew Starks
- Re: 'table' as fallback for tables, steve donovan
- Re: 'table' as fallback for tables, Coda Highland
- Re: 'table' as fallback for tables, Roberto Ierusalimschy