[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: 'table' as fallback for tables
- From: steve donovan <steve.j.donovan@...>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 16:56:14 +0200
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Philipp Janda <siffiejoe@gmx.net> wrote:
> We are not talking about the length of *any* table, but about the initial
> length that can be derived from a table literal.
Since this can be different from the sequence length, it would be very
confusing!
- References:
- Re: 'table' as fallback for tables, Jay
- Re: 'table' as fallback for tables, Tim Hill
- Re: 'table' as fallback for tables, Philipp Janda
- Re: 'table' as fallback for tables, Tim Hill
- Re: 'table' as fallback for tables, Adrián Pérez de Castro
- Re: 'table' as fallback for tables, Andrew Starks
- Re: 'table' as fallback for tables, steve donovan
- Re: 'table' as fallback for tables, Coda Highland
- Re: 'table' as fallback for tables, Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: 'table' as fallback for tables, Tim Hill
- Re: 'table' as fallback for tables, Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: 'table' as fallback for tables, Gavin Wraith
- Re: 'table' as fallback for tables, Philipp Janda
