[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: New array type? (was: 'table' as fallback for tables)
- From: Roberto Ierusalimschy <roberto@...>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 09:17:27 -0300
> Ir is of course not quite correct to say that t[#t] is not nil but t[#t+1]
> is. The truth is that rawget(t,#t) is not nil but rawget(t,#t+1) is.
Not exactly. It is easy to redefine 'rawget' :-) (If the idea is to
be pedantic...)
-- Roberto
- References:
- Re: New array type? (was: 'table' as fallback for tables), Soni L.
- Re: New array type? (was: 'table' as fallback for tables), Tim Hill
- Re: New array type? (was: 'table' as fallback for tables), Coda Highland
- Re: New array type? (was: 'table' as fallback for tables), steve donovan
- Re: New array type? (was: 'table' as fallback for tables), Joseph Manning
- Re: New array type? (was: 'table' as fallback for tables), Dirk Laurie
- Re: New array type? (was: 'table' as fallback for tables), Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: New array type? (was: 'table' as fallback for tables), Javier Guerra Giraldez
- Re: New array type? (was: 'table' as fallback for tables), Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: New array type? (was: 'table' as fallback for tables), Dirk Laurie