[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Dependency graph of top 350 rocks in luarocks.org
- From: Alban Linard <alban.linard@...>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2016 09:17:22 +0200
It seems strange that projects depend on testing tools, such as busted, as this dependency is usually used __only__ for development.
I always end up writing two rockspecs: one to install development environment (busted, cluacov, luacheck, …) and a real one for the non-development dependencies, that is uploaded to luarocks.org.
Is there a way to specify in one rockspec the distinction between dev dependencies and others ? Is there a better solution ? Good practices ?
> Le 28 juil. 2016 à 23:11, Hisham <h@hisham.hm> a écrit :
>
> Hi,
>
> I saw this on Twitter, and the author gave me the green-light to share
> it, so I thought some of you would enjoy it:
>
> By @syaffers: « Dependency graph for top 350 most dl'ed rocks. Data
> crawled from #luarocks (sry!) #lua http://bit.ly/29wNtix »
>
> Tweet:
> https://twitter.com/syaffers/status/752078854370439168
>
> Direct link to the image:
> https://s3.amazonaws.com/syaffers-stuff/h350.svg
>
> Cheers,
>
> -- Hisham
>