|
On 21/08/16 02:50 PM, Marc Balmer wrote:
Am 22.08.2016 um 05:38 schrieb Martin <eden_martin_fuhrspam@gmx.de>: On 16-08-21 07:45 AM, Marc Balmer wrote:I am working on code to easily create XML trees from Lua tables. What would, in your opinion, be a comfortable Lua table notation of XML trees, expressed as Lua tables?For me for structure like <data> <el attr1="value1", attr2="value2"> el_data </el> <el attr1="value1", attr2="value2"> el_data </el> </data> expressions "xml.data.el[1].value" or "xml.data.el[#xml.data.el].attrs['attr2']" looks convenient.I don't want to access XML from Lua, I want to represent data as Lua tables, which can then be converted to XML. I want to _PRODUCE_ xml, not parse it.
Treat tables as lists.You may want the first element to be a tag name. Alternatively you may want the element [0] to be a tag name.
For attributes, treat them as string keys.Namespaces are a pain. I'm not sure how to handle them personally. Last time I played with "XML" I couldn't figure out how to handle attribute namespaces, but for tag namespaces you can just use [0] = {tag=tagname, ns=tagns}. (Or alternatively, use plain old [0] = "ns:tag". The thing with my XML-like thingy is that it allows anything in names and namespaces so I can't use a string representation. But you can!)
-- Disclaimer: these emails may be made public at any given time, with or without reason. If you don't agree with this, DO NOT REPLY.