[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: BDD testing framework without dependencies
- From: Andrew Starks <andrew@...>
- Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 13:41:32 -0500
Replying to the thread thus far...
I think that the lasting value of testing frameworks (and logging
frameworks) is the standardized inputs and outputs (a protocol?) that
get defined when one of them becomes popular. At that point, anyone's
adhoc tests can be made to integrate into someone else's automated
build environment, without adopting pages of extra framework weight
when you just don't want to do that (for reasons good or bad).
--
Andrew Starks
- References:
- BDD testing framework without dependencies, tyrondis
- Re: BDD testing framework without dependencies, Sean Conner
- Re: BDD testing framework without dependencies, Andrew Starks
- Re: BDD testing framework without dependencies, Jorge
- Re: BDD testing framework without dependencies, Sean Conner
- Re: BDD testing framework without dependencies, Daurnimator
- Re: BDD testing framework without dependencies, steve donovan
- Re: BDD testing framework without dependencies, Sean Conner
- Re: BDD testing framework without dependencies, Thijs Schreijer
- Re: BDD testing framework without dependencies, Sean Conner
- Re: BDD testing framework without dependencies, Coda Highland
- Re: BDD testing framework without dependencies, steve donovan
- Re: BDD testing framework without dependencies, Coda Highland