Re: [MANUAL]: Discrepancy in documentation of lua_type

[Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo <lhf@...>]

> Why, if we are supposed to use symbolic constants, is LUA_TNIL (0)
> explicitly mentioned as the first? And given that it is, can the
> reader then be blamed for expecting the rest to follow consecutively?

You have a point there, yes.