|
On 23/10/2018 09:10, Thomas Jericke wrote:
Am 22.10.2018 um 19:30 schrieb Tim Hill:On Oct 16, 2018, at 6:18 AM, Viacheslav Usov <via.usov@gmail.com <mailto:via.usov@gmail.com>> wrote: On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 2:58 PM Lorenzo Donati <lorenzodonatibz@tiscali.it <mailto:lorenzodonatibz@tiscali.it>> wrote: > Now, imagine an identifier like B10010100, where each individual "character" is in fact a different "version" of a "0" or a "1". Nightmare! Especially in Lua, which happily treats any unknown identifier as a valid global variable. oоοo𝖔 Cheers, V.+1 .. I realize I’m a native English speaker and so biased, but it seems to me the benefits of Unicode identifiers are far outweighed by the problems created. —TimWhat problem can be so bad outweighting the benefit of using 🤮 (U+1F92E) as an identifier?
It could be useful in Lua error messages, though. ;-)That would clearly be a nice substitute for the "assertion error" message. :-D
-- Thomas