[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Patchless modification of Lua source code
- From: Sean Conner <sean@...>
- Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 14:34:23 -0500
It was thus said that --------- Philippe Verdy once stated:
>
> I do not know any example where a well defined priority order is not used
> by any "linker" (or programming language, or shell using linking/binding)
> for resolving "names", "symbols", or "variables", even in languages that
> allow symbolic values (e.g. Lisp, or Prolog).
INRAC.
A computer language with non-deterministic binding (and flow control, but
I digress), used for a few commerical programs that I know of.
-spc (There are *always* exceptions, except for death ... )
- References:
- Re: Patchless modification of Lua source code, Dirk Laurie
- Re: Patchless modification of Lua source code, Viacheslav Usov
- Re: Patchless modification of Lua source code, Dirk Laurie
- Re: Patchless modification of Lua source code, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
- Re: Patchless modification of Lua source code, Viacheslav Usov
- Re: Patchless modification of Lua source code, Philippe Verdy
- Re: Patchless modification of Lua source code, Viacheslav Usov
- Re: Patchless modification of Lua source code, Philippe Verdy
- Re: Patchless modification of Lua source code, Viacheslav Usov
- Re: Patchless modification of Lua source code, Philippe Verdy