Re: The += operator, again

[Frank Kastenholz <fkastenholz@...>]

One place where I think that “++” or equivalent might be as syntactic sugar for adding something to the end of a list

    Fubar[++]=...
As shorthand for
    Fubar[#Fubar+1]=...

But it’s not that big a deal

Frank



> On Dec 5, 2018, at 5:50 PM, David Favro <lua@meta-dynamic.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> I have been an advocate for the += operator, which I think is sorely lacking in Lua, for many years [1].  But in my opinion ++ and -- are much less useful, and when used give fewer advantages [2], and pose more issues, such as already being used for comments.  Yet for some reason people can't help lumping them all together and then using the issues with the unary operators as a purported complication of the binary operator, as well as increasing the overall size of the addition to the language, leading to objections of 'bloat'.
> 
> -- David
> 
> [1]: I mean in core Lua.  I consider patches and forks to be vastly less useful.
> 
> [2]: ++ and -- are very frequently used in languages such as C for loop iteration.  In Lua, iteration takes place much more often via ipairs(), and even the numeric for loop does not require explicit increment. Furthermore, the ++ operator in C often compiles to a distinct hardware instruction; while in the Lua VM, it would presumably generate code no different than "x+=1" .
>