Re: Lua 5.4.0-alpha-rc1 behavior with closing methods errors

["szbnwer@..." <szbnwer@...>]

Gé Weijers:

(sorry, i left here the previous mails opened for a while, and i didnt
see ur mail before i write.)

so that indeed sounds to be serious... i think if anyone would
implement only the checks but nothing more, then it could be measured
more or less, not counting the impact of the actual refcount, but that
could give an idea how much it would slow down the current codes.
otherwise i think it would be a better feature without being too much
of an alien thing, so it does worth the brain cycles anyhow.

and a wild thought just came up, that there are probably other value
related checks (dunno) that could be merged like one path is for
nothing to do and the other is to check what *are* to do. but this
idea works only well if "nothing to do" is much more general related
to "anything to do"...