[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: websites made simple - with Lua
- From: Asko Kauppi <asko.kauppi@...>
- Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 11:23:04 +0300
..continuing
I had a short glimpse on AFT and Structured Text now.
Let's say there are two sides to Lumikki. The one is a rude, simple,
"easifier" that resembles the Structured Text approach. It takes care
of:
- adding <HTML>, <BODY>, <P> tags if you forgot
- converting umlauts, & char automatically
- other such "rude" stuff
Then there's the other side, the macro feature.
- allows use of predefined macros (s.a. <@GRA ..> which will be _very_
powerful in the future ;)
- allows definition of your own macros (as Lua code)
The latest point I don't find in AFT & ST. It really makes all the
difference, much like Lua's "metaprogramming" mindset. Instead of
giving you tools, it gives way of easily making those tools.
This said, thanks for the links. :)
-ak
13.10.2004 kello 10:26, <P.Gertman@informgaz.gazprom.ru> kirjoitti:
Hi!
1. Lumikki seems to be an interesting project, but have you analysed
any other software with similar goals? There is an AFT (Almost Free
Text) which is like Lumikki but uses a more clean (IMHO) syntax (no
HTML tags at all). Zope project has "Structured Text" subsystem for
same purpose. And Wiki markup language... Not sure, but sometimes it
is better not to invent bycicle ;).
2. Why "<@TAG params>"? Ok, it's like HTML but also tedious - "<" and
">" are entered with shift... IMHO "[TAG params]" is better because no
shift needed and difference from HTML makes source more readable.
Well, there could be even better ways:
what about just "TAG{params}" (shift again, but so familiar... :))?
-----Original Message-----
From: lua-bounces@bazar2.conectiva.com.br
[mailto:lua-bounces@bazar2.conectiva.com.br]On Behalf Of Asko Kauppi
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 4:27 AM
To: Lua list
Subject: websites made simple - with Lua
Welcoming all you COBOL users ;D to my new Lumikki-crafter website.
http://www.sci.fi/~abisoft
Do press the links; the main page is a tribute against fancy throw-ins.
;P
-ak
12.10.2004 kello 00:44, Ben Sunshine-Hill kirjoitti:
Nahh... we all switched over to COBOL.
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 00:01:37 +0300, Asko Kauppi <asko.kauppi@sci.fi>
wrote:
is the list up, still? :)