[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [CGILua] State persistent table
- From: Javier Guerra <javier@...>
- Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 12:55:59 -0500
On Tuesday 14 December 2004 11:48 am, Tomas wrote:
> I don't have performance numbers yet (this is work for 2005 :-).
> I think you want only the launchers layer, not entirely CGILua. So, cut
> it off! A simple modification inside the launcher .lua files will do
> what you want.
right, i had thought about that a lot... but i'd like to keep the http-parsing
code. and it would be better if my launcher could still launch standard
luaPages
> > right, that's the limitation of non-preemptive multitasking;
>
> (I think it would be worst with preemptive multitasking :-(
me too, but in the end would be easier
> > but if every
> > event is managed on sub-second times, it wouldn't be noticeable for a
> > medium group of users. for wide scalability, fastCGI with SA could help
>
> Yes. SA seems to be a better solution.
my main target is for internal app servers on SMEs, usually most of the users
have a window open, but only a few are really using the app at any moment.
that's why i'd like to keep it lightweight and simple.
maybe i should forget about http, and write a generic client on javascript,
that simply opens a socket to a Lua app server. every user would get a
stable connection, and the state would be tied to that. (with a common
environment for shared data)
but i'm even more ignorant in javascript than in Lua... can it do generic
sockets???
--
Javier
Attachment:
pgpuXaXlgXGpG.pgp
Description: PGP signature