[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: bitwise ops -- make them enums! (Re: what's wrong?)
- From: Glenn Maynard <glenn@...>
- Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2005 16:00:08 -0400
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 03:33:31PM +0200, Philippe Lhoste wrote:
> >This is great functionality, but I'd still want access to the raw
> >boolean operators. Without them, there's no sensible way of doing
> >boolean algebra, which can be a great boon for optimising certain
> >algorithms. They're also pretty much mandatory for things like
> >encryption functions.
>
> MD5, CRC, just to keep in simple (?), widely used algorithms.
> Random number generators, hashes, storage of large number of booleans, etc.
These mostly seem to be obvious candidates for implementing in C, anyway,
though.
--
Glenn Maynard
- References:
- Re: what's wrong?, Mike Pall
- Re: what's wrong?, Lisa Parratt
- Re: what's wrong?, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
- Re: what's wrong?, Philippe Lhoste
- Re: what's wrong?, Mike Pall
- bitwise ops -- make them enums! (Re: what's wrong?), Asko Kauppi
- Re: bitwise ops -- make them enums! (Re: what's wrong?), Mike Pall
- Re: bitwise ops -- make them enums! (Re: what's wrong?), Asko Kauppi
- Re: bitwise ops -- make them enums! (Re: what's wrong?), Lisa Parratt
- Re: bitwise ops -- make them enums! (Re: what's wrong?), Philippe Lhoste