lua-l archive

[Date Index] [Thread Index]

• September 01, 2005
  • calling fcuntion from other lua context, Mario
  • Re: Lua Socket (SMTP)..., Matthew Percival
  • Re: Lua Socket (SMTP)..., Matthew Percival
  • Re: Size of a non numerical indexed table, Jose Marin
  • Re: Size of a non numerical indexed table, Lisa Parratt
  • Re: Size of a non numerical indexed table, Lisa Parratt
  • Arguments by reference?, Jose Marin
  • Re: Size of a non numerical indexed table, Wim Couwenberg
  • Re: Arguments by reference?, Lisa Parratt
  • Re: Size of a non numerical indexed table, Mike Pall
  • Re: Size of a non numerical indexed table, Lisa Parratt
  • Re: Arguments by reference?, Boyko Bantchev
  • Re: Arguments by reference?, Lisa Parratt
  • Re: Size of a non numerical indexed table, Wim Couwenberg
  • Re: Size of a non numerical indexed table, Mike Pall
  • Re: Size of a non numerical indexed table, Lisa Parratt
  • Re: Size of a non numerical indexed table, Lisa Parratt
  • Re: Size of a non numerical indexed table, Wim Couwenberg
  • Re: Size of a non numerical indexed table, Lisa Parratt
  • Re: Arguments by reference?, Rici Lake
  • Re: Size of a non numerical indexed table, Mike Pall
  • Re: Syntax and redundancy, Antero Vipunen
  • Re: [Possibly Spam] Re: Size of a non numerical indexed table, Rici Lake
  • Re: Lua 5.1 - Changes ?, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: Syntax and redundancy, Rici Lake
  • Re: Syntax and redundancy, Antero Vipunen
  • Re: Size of a non numerical indexed table, Mark Hamburg
  • Re: Size of a non numerical indexed table, Rici Lake
  • Re: Size of a non numerical indexed table, Mark Hamburg
  • Re: Size of a non numerical indexed table, Rici Lake
  • Re: Size of a non numerical indexed table, David Given
  • Re: Size of a non numerical indexed table, Rici Lake
  • Re: Size of a non numerical indexed table, Rici Lake
  • Re: Size of a non numerical indexed table, Mark Hamburg
  • lua_newthread, Brent Arias
  • Re: Size of a non numerical indexed table, Mike Pall
  • Re: lua_newthread, Mike Pall
  • Re: Size of a non numerical indexed table, Rici Lake
  • RE: Arguments by reference?, Brent Arias
  • Re: Syntax and redundancy, Boyko Bantchev
  • Re: Arguments by reference?, Rici Lake
  • Re: Arguments by reference?, Glenn Maynard
  • Re: Arguments by reference?, Boyko Bantchev
  • Re: Arguments by reference?, Ben Sunshine-Hill
  • Re: Arguments by reference?, Boyko Bantchev
  • Re: Arguments by reference?, Zachary P. Landau
  • Re: Arguments by reference?, Chris Marrin
  • Re: Arguments by reference?, Boyko Bantchev
  • Re: Arguments by reference?, David Olofson
  • RE: Arguments by reference?, Brent Arias
  • RE: Arguments by reference?, Brent Arias
  • Re[2]: Arguments by reference?, Doug Currie
  • Re: Arguments by reference?, Aaron Brown
  • Re: Arguments by reference?, Lisa Parratt
  • Re: Arguments by reference?, Boyko Bantchev
  • Re: calling fcuntion from other lua context, Jeffrey Williams
  • Rici tries to explain. Was Re: Arguments by reference?, Rici Lake
• September 02, 2005
  • Re: Syntax and redundancy, Rici Lake
  • coroutine from registry, Brent Arias
  • Re: [OT] Size of a non numerical indexed table, Antero Vipunen
  • Shootout Update/PLEAC, Matthew M. Burke
  • Lua 5.1 (alpha) now available, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Luasocket 2.0 beta3 and Lua 5.1 work 6, Matthew M. Burke
  • Re: Lua 5.1 (alpha) now available, Daniel Silverstone
  • Re: Lua 5.1 (alpha) now available, Adrian Perez
  • [OT] Experience is what you get when you don't get what you want, Vijay Aswadhati
  • Re: Rici tries to explain. Was Re: Arguments by reference?, William Trenker
  • Re: Lua 5.1 (alpha) now available, William Trenker
  • Re: Lua 5.1 (alpha) now available, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: Lua 5.1 (alpha) now available, William Trenker
  • Re: [OT] Experience is what you get when you don't get what you want, Adrian Perez
  • Semantics and implementation. Was Re: Rici tries to explain. Was Re: Arguments by reference?, Rici Lake
  • Re: Lua 5.1 (alpha) now available, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: Lua 5.1 (alpha) now available, William Trenker
  • Re: Lua 5.1 (alpha) now available, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: [OT] Experience is what you get when you don't get what you want, Steven Elkins
  • Lua 5.1 (alpha): vararg and unpack?, PA
  • Lua 5.1 (alpha): Documentation "bug" and suggestions, steffenj
  • AW: Lua 5.1 (alpha) - no more table.foreach(i) ?, steffenj
  • Re: AW: Lua 5.1 (alpha) - no more table.foreach(i) ?, PA
  • Re: Lua 5.1 (alpha): Documentation "bug" and suggestions, Klaus Ripke
  • RE: Lua 5.1 (alpha): Documentation "bug" and suggestions, Vijay Aswadhati
  • 'revoking' a userdata, DC
  • Re: Lua 5.1 (alpha): Documentation "bug" and suggestions, Chris Pressey
  • Re: 'revoking' a userdata, Ben Sunshine-Hill
  • RE: 'revoking' a userdata, Jasmin Patry
  • AW: Lua 5.1 (alpha): Documentation, steffenj
  • Re: AW: Lua 5.1 (alpha): Documentation, David Given
• September 03, 2005
  • RE: Lua 5.1 (alpha): Documentation "bug" and suggestions, Vijay Aswadhati
  • Re: Lua 5.1 (alpha) now available, JSaw
  • Re: Lua 5.1 (alpha) now available, David Burgess
  • Re: 'revoking' a userdata, Kriss
  • Re: Lua 5.1 (alpha) now available, Philippe Lhoste
  • Re: Lua 5.1 (alpha): Documentation "bug" and suggestions, Philippe Lhoste
  • Re: AW: Lua 5.1 (alpha): Documentation, Philippe Lhoste
  • Re: Lua 5.1 (alpha): Documentation "bug" and suggestions, Philippe Lhoste
  • Re: Lua 5.1 (alpha): Documentation "bug" and suggestions, Kriss
  • Re: Lua 5.1 (alpha) now available, Wim Couwenberg
  • Re: Lua 5.1 (alpha) now available, Wim Couwenberg
  • Re: Lua 5.1 (alpha) now available, Mike Pall
  • Re: Lua 5.1 (alpha) now available, Mike Pall
  • Re: Lua 5.1 (alpha) now available, David Burgess
  • Re: Lua 5.1 (alpha) now available, Gavin Wraith
  • Re: Lua 5.1 (alpha) now available, Mike Pall
  • Re: Lua 5.1 (alpha) now available, Wim Couwenberg
  • Re: Lua 5.1 (alpha) now available, Mike Pall
  • Re: Lua 5.1 (alpha) now available, Gavin Wraith
  • __len missing from 5.1a manual?, Gavin Wraith
  • Re: 'revoking' a userdata, David Olofson
  • Re: Lua 5.1 (alpha) now available, Remo Dentato
  • what's wrong?, Stukov
  • Re: Lua 5.1 (alpha) now available, Mike Pall
  • Re: what's wrong?, Mike Pall
  • Re: Luasocket 2.0 beta3 and Lua 5.1 work 6, Diego Nehab
  • Re[2]: what's wrong?, Stukov
  • Re: Lua 5.1 (alpha) now available, David Burgess
  • Re: Lua 5.1 (alpha) now available, David Burgess
  • Re: Lua 5.1 (alpha) now available, Remo Dentato
  • Re: what's wrong?, Lisa Parratt
  • Re: what's wrong?, Glenn Maynard
  • Re: what's wrong?, Rici Lake
  • Re: Re[2]: what's wrong?, Rici Lake
• September 04, 2005
  • Replacing substrings in a string, David Given
  • Re: Replacing substrings in a string, Philippe Lhoste
  • Re: what's wrong?, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: what's wrong?, Philippe Lhoste
  • 5.1: LUA_VERSION_NUM, Peter Kümmel
  • Re: 5.1: LUA_VERSION_NUM, Philippe Lhoste
  • Lua 5.1 (alpha): table.insert()?, PA
  • Re: what's wrong?, Mike Pall
  • Re: Lua 5.1 (alpha): table.insert()?, Mike Pall
  • bitwise ops -- make them enums! (Re: what's wrong?), Asko Kauppi
  • Re: what's wrong?, Mike Pall
  • Re: Re[2]: what's wrong?, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: bitwise ops -- make them enums! (Re: what's wrong?), Mike Pall
  • loadlib 5.1 alpha - bug1, David Burgess
  • [PATCH] lposix patches, JSaw
  • Re: bitwise ops -- make them enums! (Re: what's wrong?), Asko Kauppi
  • PATCH: quick & small patch for pclose posix compliance, Unai Uribarri
  • Re: 5.1: LUA_VERSION_NUM, Peter Kümmel
  • Re: loadlib 5.1 alpha - bug1, Mike Pall
  • Re: 5.1: LUA_VERSION_NUM, Mike Pall
  • Re: 5.1: LUA_VERSION_NUM, Peter Kümmel
  • Re: bitwise ops -- make them enums! (Re: what's wrong?), Kriss
  • Re: loadlib 5.1 alpha - bug1, David Burgess
  • RE: 5.1: LUA_VERSION_NUM, Richard Ranft
  • windows, require & semi-colons, Ashwin Hirschi
  • Re: loadlib 5.1 alpha - bug1, Ashwin Hirschi
  • Re: bitwise ops -- make them enums! (Re: what's wrong?), Chris Pressey
  • Re: windows, require & semi-colons, Chris Pressey
  • Re: bitwise ops -- make them enums! (Re: what's wrong?), Rici Lake
  • Re: bitwise ops -- make them enums! (Re: what's wrong?), Lisa Parratt
  • Re: [PATCH] lposix patches, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re[2]: what's wrong?, Stukov
  • Re: [ANN] Lua-GD 2.0.33r1 released, Alexandre Erwin Ittner
  • PATCH: hex numbers and bit ops, Mike Pall
• September 05, 2005
  • Re: Rici tries to explain. Was Re: Arguments by reference?, Michael Richter
  • Re: Size of a non numerical indexed table, Shannon Stewman
  • Re: PATCH: hex numbers and bit ops, Mike Pall
  • Re: PATCH: hex numbers and bit ops, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: Lua 5.1 (alpha) now available, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: 5.1: LUA_VERSION_NUM, Philippe Lhoste
  • Re: windows, require & semi-colons, Philippe Lhoste
  • new project added, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: bitwise ops -- make them enums! (Re: what's wrong?), Philippe Lhoste
  • Re: bitwise ops -- make them enums! (Re: what's wrong?), Philippe Lhoste
  • LuaXML?, David Given
  • Re: PATCH: hex numbers and bit ops, Philippe Lhoste
  • Re: PATCH: hex numbers and bit ops, Philippe Lhoste
  • Re: Lua 5.1 (alpha) now available, Mike Pall
  • Re: PATCH: hex numbers and bit ops, Rici Lake
  • Re: PATCH: hex numbers and bit ops, Mike Pall
  • Re: Rici tries to explain. Was Re: Arguments by reference?, Jamie Webb
  • Re: PATCH: hex numbers and bit ops, Mike Pall
  • Re: PATCH: hex numbers and bit ops, Lisa Parratt
  • Re: PATCH: hex numbers and bit ops, Kein-Hong Man
  • Lua 5.0, Brian Weed
  • Re: Lua 5.0, Wim Couwenberg
  • Re: Lua 5.0, Shannon Stewman
  • Re: bitwise ops -- make them enums! (Re: what's wrong?), Rici Lake
  • Re: Lua 5.0, Wim Couwenberg
  • Re: Lua 5.0, Brian Weed
  • Re: calling fcuntion from other lua context, Mario
  • tolua + lua5.1alpha, Stukov
  • Re: bitwise ops -- make them enums! (Re: what's wrong?), Glenn Maynard
  • CGILua / Xavante: sessions and timeouts, William Trenker
  • Re: bitwise ops -- make them enums! (Re: what's wrong?), Lisa Parratt
  • Re: bitwise ops -- make them enums! (Re: what's wrong?), Lisa Parratt
  • Re: 5.1: LUA_VERSION_NUM, David Burgess
  • Re: bitwise ops -- make them enums! (Re: what's wrong?), Glenn Maynard
  • Re: bitwise ops -- make them enums! (Re: what's wrong?), Rici Lake
  • Re: Lua 5.1 (alpha) now available, David Morris-Oliveros
• September 06, 2005
  • Re: bitwise ops -- make them enums! (Re: what's wrong?), Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • number of parameters of a function, Edwin Eyan Moragas
  • Re: CGILua / Xavante: sessions and timeouts, Javier Guerra
  • Re: number of parameters of a function, Rici Lake
  • Re: tolua + lua5.1alpha, Antero Vipunen
  • Re: number of parameters of a function, Edwin Eyan Moragas
  • Re: tolua + lua5.1alpha, David Morris-Oliveros
  • [ANN] tolua++ 1.0.6 and lua_qt4 0.0.2a, Ariel Manzur
  • Re: bitwise ops -- make them enums! (Re: what's wrong?), Lisa Parratt
  • Re: number of parameters of a function, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: tolua + lua5.1alpha, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re[2]: lhf's token filter patch, Gunnar Zötl
  • Re: lhf's token filter patch, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • syntax rules, Gunnar Zötl
  • Re: [ANN] tolua++ 1.0.6 and lua_qt4 0.0.2a, Lisa Parratt
  • Re: tolua + lua5.1alpha, Glenn Maynard
  • Re: luaL_checkudata() changes for 5.1 (was tolua + lua5.1alpha), Doug Rogers
  • Re: luaL_checkudata() changes for 5.1 (was tolua + lua5.1alpha), Glenn Maynard
  • Re: luaL_checkudata() changes for 5.1 (was tolua + lua5.1alpha), Doug Rogers
  • Re: luaL_checkudata() changes for 5.1 (was tolua + lua5.1alpha), Mark Hamburg
• September 07, 2005
  • Re: LuaXML?, David Burgess
  • Re: luaL_checkudata() changes for 5.1 (was tolua + lua5.1alpha), Antero Vipunen
  • Re: number of parameters of a function, Edwin Eyan Moragas
  • Re: [ANN] tolua++ 1.0.6 and lua_qt4 0.0.2a, Ariel Manzur
  • math.random() when lua_Number is int, Graham Wilson
  • Re: math.random() when lua_Number is int, Antero Vipunen
  • Re: math.random() when lua_Number is int, Graham Wilson
  • patch: local a,b from t, Peter Shook
  • Re: CGILua / Xavante: sessions and timeouts, William Trenker
  • Re: CGILua / Xavante: sessions and timeouts, Javier Guerra
  • Re: CGILua / Xavante: sessions and timeouts, Javier Guerra
  • Re: patch: local a,b from t, Antero Vipunen
  • Re: math.random() when lua_Number is int, Shannon Stewman
  • Re: Lua 5.1 (alpha) now available, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: Replacing substrings in a string, Mildred
  • tolua++ 1.0.5 and 1.0.6 patch, Mildred
  • Re: Replacing substrings in a string, Philippe Lhoste
  • Re: Lua 5.1 (alpha) now available, Mike Pall
  • Re: Lua 5.1 (alpha) now available, Taj Khattra
  • Re: Replacing substrings in a string, David Given
  • Re: Lua 5.1 (alpha) now available, David Burgess
  • Re: Lua 5.1 (alpha) now available, David Burgess
  • Re: patch: local a,b from t, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • CGIlua / Xavante: session ids and thread (coroutine) safety?, William Trenker
  • Re: math.random() when lua_Number is int, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
• September 08, 2005
  • Re: [ANN] tolua++ 1.0.6 and lua_qt4 0.0.2a, Philippe Lhoste
  • Re: [ANN] tolua++ 1.0.6 and lua_qt4 0.0.2a, Ashwin Hirschi
  • Xavante: default request.parsed_url.port, William Trenker
  • Re: Xavante: default request.parsed_url.port, Javier Guerra
  • modified tolua++, Mildred
  • Re: patch: local a,b from t, Peter Shook
  • Re: math.random() when lua_Number is int, Lisa Parratt
  • os.time dst problem, JAST
  • Re: math.random() when lua_Number is int, Lisa Parratt
  • Re: [ANN] tolua++ 1.0.6 and lua_qt4 0.0.2a, Lisa Parratt
  • Re: [ANN] tolua++ 1.0.6 and lua_qt4 0.0.2a, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Advenced Readline patch to 5.1-alpha version, Mildred
  • Re: patch: local a,b from t, Mildred
  • Lua performance, Lisa Parratt
  • Re: patch: local a,b from t, Peter Shook
  • [ANN] LuaJIT 1.0.3, Mike Pall
  • Re: Lua performance, Mike Pall
  • Detecting locals, Lisa Parratt
  • Re: [ANN] tolua++ 1.0.6 and lua_qt4 0.0.2a, Antero Vipunen
  • Re: Lua performance, Lisa Parratt
  • Re: [ANN] tolua++ 1.0.6 and lua_qt4 0.0.2a, Lisa Parratt
  • Re: Xavante: default request.parsed_url.port, William Trenker
  • RE: [ANN] tolua++ 1.0.6 and lua_qt4 0.0.2a, Carlos Augusto Teixeira Mendes
  • How access local variables with load*() functions, Mildred
  • Re: [ANN] tolua++ 1.0.6 and lua_qt4 0.0.2a, Javier Guerra
  • Re: Xavante: default request.parsed_url.port, Javier Guerra
  • Re: [ANN] LuaJIT 1.0.3, William Trenker
  • Re: [ANN] tolua++ 1.0.6 and lua_qt4 0.0.2a, Shannon Stewman
  • Re: How access local variables with load*() functions, Aaron Brown
  • RE: [ANN] tolua++ 1.0.6 and lua_qt4 0.0.2a, Carlos Augusto Teixeira Mendes
  • Re: Xavante: default request.parsed_url.port, William Trenker
  • Re: [ANN] tolua++ 1.0.6 and lua_qt4 0.0.2a, Javier Guerra
  • Re: Xavante: default request.parsed_url.port, Javier Guerra
  • Re: [ANN] LuaJIT 1.0.3, Mike Pall
  • Re: Xavante: default request.parsed_url.port, William Trenker
  • Re: [ANN] LuaJIT 1.0.3, Thomas Wrensch
  • Re: [ANN] LuaJIT 1.0.3, David Given
  • Re: [ANN] LuaJIT 1.0.3, William Trenker
• September 09, 2005
  • Re: [ANN] LuaJIT 1.0.3, Mike Pall
  • Re: [ANN] LuaJIT 1.0.3, David Burgess
  • About getfenv, Mildred
  • Explaination about 5.1 package & module functions, Mildred
  • Re: How access local variables with load*() functions, Peter Shook
  • Re: How access local variables with load*() functions, Peter Shook
  • Re: [ANN] tolua++ 1.0.6 and lua_qt4 0.0.2a, Antero Vipunen
  • Re: About getfenv, Peter Shook
  • Re: [ANN] tolua++ 1.0.6 and lua_qt4 0.0.2a, Ariel Manzur
  • Re: [ANN] tolua++ 1.0.6 and lua_qt4 0.0.2a, Ariel Manzur
  • Re: [ANN] LuaJIT 1.0.3, Lisa Parratt
  • Re: [ANN] tolua++ 1.0.6 and lua_qt4 0.0.2a, Lisa Parratt
  • Re: [ANN] tolua++ 1.0.6 and lua_qt4 0.0.2a, Lisa Parratt
  • Re: [ANN] LuaJIT 1.0.3, Wim Couwenberg
  • lua_qt vs Qt licenses (was Re: [ANN] tolua++ 1.0.6 and lua_qt4 0.0.2a), Javier Guerra
  • Re: Advenced Readline patch to 5.1-alpha version, Zachary P. Landau
  • new project added, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: [ANN] LuaJIT 1.0.3, Steven Elkins
  • Re: Lua 5.1 (alpha) now available, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: Lua 5.1 (alpha) now available, William Trenker
  • Re: Lua 5.1 (alpha) now available, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
• September 10, 2005
  • Re: Lua 5.1 (alpha) now available, Erik Hougaard
  • Missing string.find functionality in Lua 5.1, Shmuel Zeigerman
  • Re: Missing string.find functionality in Lua 5.1, PA
  • Re: Missing string.find functionality in Lua 5.1, Shmuel Zeigerman
  • new project added, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
• September 11, 2005
  • [patch] luaL_checkudata problem, Wolfgang Oertl
  • Lua 5.1 changes, David Burgess
  • Re: Lua 5.1 (alpha) now available, Doug Currie
  • Re: Lua 5.1 changes, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: Missing string.find functionality in Lua 5.1, Rici Lake
  • Re: Missing string.find functionality in Lua 5.1, David Burgess
  • Re: Missing string.find functionality in Lua 5.1, Rici Lake
  • Re: Missing string.find functionality in Lua 5.1, Shmuel Zeigerman
  • Re: Missing string.find functionality in Lua 5.1, David Burgess
  • Parser messages lng, Stukov
  • Re: Parser messages lng, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: Missing string.find functionality in Lua 5.1, David Burgess
  • Re: Lua 5.1 (alpha) now available, Mike Pall
  • Re: Parser messages lng, Rob Kendrick
  • Re: Missing string.find functionality in Lua 5.1, Shmuel Zeigerman
  • Re: Lua 5.1 (alpha) now available, Glenn Maynard
  • Re: Lua 5.1 (alpha) now available, Asko Kauppi
  • Re: Lua 5.1 (alpha) now available, Mike Pall
  • Re: Parser messages lng, Philippe Lhoste
• September 12, 2005
  • luaopen_loadlib in 5.1?, Chris Marrin
  • lua_dostring not in Lua 5.1?, Chris Marrin
  • Re: luaopen_loadlib in 5.1?, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: lua_dostring not in Lua 5.1?, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: luaopen_loadlib in 5.1?, Chris Marrin
  • Re: lua_dostring not in Lua 5.1?, Chris Marrin
  • Re: lua_dostring not in Lua 5.1?, Chris Marrin
  • Why can't I do for...in on a table?, Chris Marrin
  • DST PROBLEM in os.time, JAST
  • Re: Why can't I do for...in on a table?, Wim Couwenberg
  • Re: Why can't I do for...in on a table?, Wim Couwenberg
  • Re: DST PROBLEM in os.time, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: Why can't I do for...in on a table?, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: Why can't I do for...in on a table?, David Burgess
  • Re: Missing string.find functionality in Lua 5.1, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: Missing string.find functionality in Lua 5.1, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: [patch] luaL_checkudata problem, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: [ANN] LuaJIT 1.0.3, Adam D. Moss
  • Re: [ANN] LuaJIT 1.0.3, Mike Pall
  • luasocket-2.0-beta3 under lua-5.1-alpha, Joseph Stewart
  • Re: Why can't I do for...in on a table?, Wim Couwenberg
  • Re: Why can't I do for...in on a table?, Wim Couwenberg
  • Re: Missing string.find functionality in Lua 5.1, Shmuel Zeigerman
  • Re: Why can't I do for...in on a table?, Ashwin Hirschi
  • Re: Why can't I do for...in on a table?, Mike Pall
  • Re: Why can't I do for...in on a table?, Aaron Brown
  • Re: [ANN] LuaJIT 1.0.3, Adam D. Moss
  • Re: [ANN] LuaJIT 1.0.3, Marco Pontello
  • Re: Why can't I do for...in on a table?, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: [ANN] LuaJIT 1.0.3, Mike Pall
  • Re: Missing string.find functionality in Lua 5.1, Rici Lake
  • Re: [ANN] LuaJIT 1.0.3, Marco Pontello
  • [patch] continue statement, Wolfgang Oertl
  • Re: [patch] continue statement, Shannon Stewman
  • Re: [ANN] LuaJIT 1.0.3, David Given
  • Re: Why can't I do for...in on a table?, Chris Marrin
  • Re[2]: Parser messages lng, Stukov
  • Re: Why can't I do for...in on a table?, Ashwin Hirschi
  • Re: Why can't I do for...in on a table?, Chris Marrin
  • Re: Why can't I do for...in on a table?, Wim Couwenberg
  • Re: [patch] continue statement, Chris Marrin
  • Re: [patch] continue statement, Chris Marrin
  • Re: Why can't I do for...in on a table?, Chris Marrin
  • Re: Why can't I do for...in on a table?, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: [patch] continue statement, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: [ANN] LuaJIT 1.0.3, Mike Pall
  • Re: [patch] continue statement, Shannon Stewman
  • Re: Why can't I do for...in on a table?, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Lua Basics: modules()?, William Trenker
  • Re: Why can't I do for...in on a table?, Lisa Parratt
  • Re: Lua Basics: modules()?, Tim Gogolin
  • Re: Why can't I do for...in on a table?, Wim Couwenberg
  • Re: Lua Basics: modules()?, William Trenker
  • Re: [ANN] LuaJIT 1.0.3, David Given
  • Re: Why can't I do for...in on a table?, Chris Marrin
  • Re: Why can't I do for...in on a table?, Chris Marrin
• September 13, 2005
  • Re: DST PROBLEM in os.time, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • LuaSocket Finalized Exceptions: protect won't work with assert, William Trenker
  • Re: LuaSocket Finalized Exceptions: protect won't work with assert, Diego Nehab
  • lua as windows scripting engine, Antero Vipunen
  • RE: [ANN] LuaJIT 1.0.3, John Mckenna
  • Re: lua as windows scripting engine, Philippe Lhoste
  • Re: lua as windows scripting engine, Antero Vipunen
  • Re: lua as windows scripting engine, Antero Vipunen
  • Re: lua as windows scripting engine, David Burgess
  • RE: lua as windows scripting engine, Vijay Aswadhati
  • lua-5.1-alpha: length operator on tables (arrays) and nil values, Michael Roth
  • RE: [ANN] LuaJIT 1.0.3, Nick Trout
  • Re: lua-5.1-alpha: length operator on tables (arrays) and nil values, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: [ANN] LuaJIT 1.0.3, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: lua-5.1-alpha: length operator on tables (arrays) and nil values, Michael Roth
  • Re: lua as windows scripting engine, Antero Vipunen
• September 14, 2005
  • Re: lua-5.1-alpha: length operator on tables (arrays) and nil values, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • RE: [ANN] LuaJIT 1.0.3, Nick Trout
  • #include Feature Request, JAST
  • Re: #include Feature Request, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: lua-5.1-alpha: length operator on tables (arrays) and nil values, PA
  • RE: lua as windows scripting engine, Vijay Aswadhati
  • Re: lua-5.1-alpha: length operator on tables (arrays) and nil values, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • [patch] continue statement, fixed (?), Wolfgang Oertl
  • select("#", ...) idiom, Lucas Ackerman
  • Re: select("#", ...) idiom, PA
  • Re: select("#", ...) idiom, Shannon Stewman
  • Re: select("#", ...) idiom, Doug Currie
  • Re: select("#", ...) idiom, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • RE: select("#", ...) idiom, Bilyk, Alex
  • Re: select("#", ...) idiom, Shannon Stewman
  • Re: select("#", ...) idiom, Lisa Parratt
  • Re: select("#", ...) idiom, Peter Shook
  • Re: select("#", ...) idiom, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: select("#", ...) idiom, Mark Hamburg
  • Re: select("#", ...) idiom, Mark Hamburg
  • Re: select("#", ...) idiom, Ben Sunshine-Hill
  • Re: select("#", ...) idiom, Michael Roth
  • Re: select("#", ...) idiom, Michael Roth
• September 15, 2005
  • RE: lua-5.1-alpha: length operator on tables (arrays) and nil values, Bilyk, Alex
  • Re: lua-5.1-alpha: length operator on tables (arrays) and nil values, Ben Sunshine-Hill
  • Re: lua-5.1-alpha: length operator on tables (arrays) and nil values, Chris Marrin
  • Re: lua-5.1-alpha: length operator on tables (arrays) and nil values, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re[2]: select("#", ...) idiom, Doug Currie
  • Re: select("#", ...) idiom, Aaron Brown
  • Re: select("#", ...) idiom, Wim Couwenberg
  • detecting Lua version & capabilities within configure, mark
  • Detecting Lua version & capabilities within configure, mark
  • Debugger, Zulfiqar Malik
  • Re: lua-5.1-alpha: length operator on tables (arrays) and nil values, Lisa Parratt
  • Re: [ANN] LuaJIT 1.0.3, Marco Pontello
  • Re: select("#", ...) idiom, Mildred
  • Re[2]: select("#", ...) idiom, Doug Currie
  • Re: Re[2]: select("#", ...) idiom, Rici Lake
  • Re: [ANN] LuaJIT 1.0.3, Mike Pall
  • Re: [ANN] LuaJIT 1.0.3, Mike Pall
  • Re: lua-5.1-alpha: length operator on tables (arrays) and nil, Rici Lake
  • Re: lua-5.1-alpha: length operator on tables (arrays) and nil, Lisa Parratt
  • Re: lua-5.1-alpha: length operator on tables (arrays) and nil, Wim Couwenberg
  • Re: [ANN] LuaJIT 1.0.3, Adam D. Moss
  • Re: lua-5.1-alpha: length operator on tables (arrays) and nil, Lisa Parratt
  • Re: lua-5.1-alpha: length operator on tables (arrays) and nil, Rici Lake
  • Re[4]: select("#", ...) idiom, Doug Currie
  • Re: [ANN] LuaJIT 1.0.3, Mark Hamburg
  • using code from multiple files, Lieven CI
  • Re: Detecting Lua version & capabilities within configure, pancake
  • Re: [ANN] LuaJIT 1.0.3, Mike Pall
  • tuples, Lucas Ackerman
  • Re: tuples, Rici Lake
  • setfenv (was Re: tuples), Mark Hamburg
  • RE: [ANN] LuaJIT 1.0.3, Nick Trout
  • Re: tuples, Adrian Perez
  • RE: [ANN] LuaJIT 1.0.3, Nick Trout
  • Re: [ANN] LuaJIT 1.0.3, Zachary P. Landau
  • Re: [ANN] LuaJIT 1.0.3, Marco Pontello
  • Re: select("#", ...) idiom, Michael Roth
  • Re: select("#", ...) idiom, Michael Roth
  • Re: lua-5.1-alpha: length operator on tables (arrays) and nil values, Michael Roth
• September 16, 2005
  • lua_newthread: is this essentially creating a coroutine?, Edwin Eyan Moragas
  • Re: lua_newthread: is this essentially creating a coroutine?, David Morris-Oliveros
  • Re: lua_newthread: is this essentially creating a coroutine?, Edwin Eyan Moragas
  • coroutines, Michael Broughton
  • Re: lua_newthread: is this essentially creating a coroutine?, Klaus Ripke
  • Re: lua_newthread: is this essentially creating a coroutine?, Edwin Eyan Moragas
  • Re: select("#", ...) idiom, Rici Lake
  • Re: setfenv (was Re: tuples), Rici Lake
  • Re: setfenv (was Re: tuples), Javier Guerra
  • Re: setfenv (was Re: tuples), Rici Lake
  • error reporting question, Robert Raschke
  • What does newproxy() in 5.1-alpha?, Michael Roth
  • Re: error reporting question, Mike Pall
  • Re: error reporting question, Robert Raschke
  • Re: error reporting question, David Burgess
  • Re: What does newproxy() in 5.1-alpha?, David Burgess
  • Re: error reporting question, Robert Raschke
  • Re: using code from multiple files, Shmuel Zeigerman
  • Re: coroutines, Zachary P. Landau
  • Re: setfenv (was Re: tuples), Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: What does newproxy() in 5.1-alpha?, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: coroutines, Michael Broughton
  • Re: coroutines, Zachary P. Landau
  • Re: setfenv (was Re: tuples), Wim Couwenberg
  • RE: coroutines, Brent Arias
• September 17, 2005
  • Re: lua-5.1-alpha: length operator on tables (arrays) and nil values, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Can luaL_loadfile() be used from a metamethod?, Marcus Brown
• September 18, 2005
  • Re: Can luaL_loadfile() be used from a metamethod?, Marcus Brown
  • Lua 5.1: Why not allow nedted [[ ... ]] ?, Mildred
  • Re: Lua 5.1: Why not allow nedted [[ ... ]] ?, Philippe Lhoste
  • U-umlaut and two-letter combination, Florian Berger
  • Re: U-umlaut and two-letter combination, Asko Kauppi
  • Re: U-umlaut and two-letter combination, Shmuel Zeigerman
• September 19, 2005
  • Fast determination of userdata type, Shaun
  • Re: U-umlaut and two-letter combination, Florian Berger
  • Re: U-umlaut and two-letter combination, Philippe Lhoste
  • Re: Fast determination of userdata type, Shannon Stewman
  • Any common bug-inducting mistake going from 5.0 to 5.1alpha?, Marco Pontello
  • Re: Any common bug-inducting mistake going from 5.0 to 5.1alpha?, David Burgess
• September 20, 2005
  • Re: Any common bug-inducting mistake going from 5.0 to 5.1alpha?, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: Any common bug-inducting mistake going from 5.0 to 5.1alpha?, Marco Pontello
  • Re: Any common bug-inducting mistake going from 5.0 to 5.1alpha?, Marco Pontello
  • Re: Any common bug-inducting mistake going from 5.0 to 5.1alpha?, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: U-umlaut and two-letter combination, PA
  • Lua and C++ exceptions, Thomas Lefort
  • Uploaded patch for my "Uniform Compare" mod, Chris Marrin
  • nested foreach, Brent Arias
  • Re: nested foreach, Adrian Perez
• September 21, 2005
  • Re: [patch] continue statement, jrs
  • Re: U-umlaut and two-letter combination, Florian Berger
  • Re: [patch] continue statement, Klaus Ripke
  • Re: Any common bug-inducting mistake going from 5.0 to 5.1alpha?, Marco Pontello
  • Re: using code from multiple files, Lieven CI
  • Aw: nested foreach, steffenj
  • Building luac (5.1 alpha), Shmuel Zeigerman
  • Re: Building luac (5.1 alpha), Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: Building luac (5.1 alpha), Shmuel Zeigerman
• September 22, 2005
  • Modifying a table while iterating over it?, Cory Bloyd
  • Re: Modifying a table while iterating over it?, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: Modifying a table while iterating over it?, Aaron Brown
  • Re: Modifying a table while iterating over it?, Mark Hamburg
• September 23, 2005
  • Copying lua_State, Zulfiqar Malik
  • Re: Copying lua_State, Ben Sunshine-Hill
  • Re: Copying lua_State, Shannon Stewman
  • Re: Modifying a table while iterating over it?, Philippe Lhoste
  • Object binding comments wanted, David Given
  • Re: Object binding comments wanted, Adam D. Moss
  • Copying data from lua_State to lua_State, Jeffrey Williams
  • Re: Object binding comments wanted, David Given
  • Re: Object binding comments wanted, Shannon Stewman
  • continuing continue - was Re: [patch] continue statement, jrs
• September 24, 2005
  • Re: Object binding comments wanted, Eric Jacobs
  • Re: Object binding comments wanted, Eric Jacobs
  • Re: continuing continue - was Re: [patch] continue statement, Rici Lake
  • Re: continuing continue - was Re: [patch] continue statement, Glenn Maynard
  • Debugging coroutines question, Terisquas Brothers
  • Re: continuing continue - was Re: [patch] continue statement, Shmuel Zeigerman
  • Re: continuing continue - was Re: [patch] continue statement, David Given
  • Re: continuing continue - was Re: [patch] continue statement, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: continuing continue - was Re: [patch] continue statement, Chris Marrin
  • Re: continuing continue - was Re: [patch] continue statement, Javier Guerra
  • Debuggers for Lua???, Chris Marrin
  • RE: Debuggers for Lua???, Attila Siladji
  • Re: continuing continue - was Re: [patch] continue statement, Adrian Perez
  • Object binding (Gtk), Wolfgang Oertl
  • Re: continuing continue - was Re: [patch] continue statement, Glenn Maynard
  • Re: Object binding (Gtk), Asko Kauppi
• September 25, 2005
  • Re: continuing continue - was Re: [patch] continue statement, Rici Lake
  • Re: Debuggers for Lua???, Chris Marrin
  • Re: continuing continue - was Re: [patch] continue statement, Glenn Maynard
  • RE: Debuggers for Lua???, Attila Siladji
  • Re: continuing continue - was Re: [patch] continue statement, Philippe Lhoste
  • Re: continuing continue - was Re: [patch] continue statement, Glenn Maynard
  • Re: Debuggers for Lua???, Chris Marrin
  • New scoping rule for "repeat" and "continue" patch, Rici Lake
  • multiple assignement clarification, Enrico Tassi
  • Re: multiple assignement clarification, Jamie Webb
  • Re: multiple assignement clarification, Rici Lake
  • Memory leaks debugging, Wolfgang Oertl
  • Re: Object binding comments wanted, Mark Hamburg
• September 26, 2005
  • '-w' command line option removed?, Shmuel Zeigerman
  • Re: '-w' command line option removed?, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Thread defs, Stukov
  • Re: '-w' command line option removed?, Shmuel Zeigerman
  • Re: Thread defs, Mike Pall
  • Re[2]: Thread defs, Stukov
  • Newbie questions, carol.hurwitz
  • Re: Object binding comments wanted, David Given
  • Re: Newbie questions, Aaron Brown
  • Re: Newbie questions, Rici Lake
  • Re: New scoping rule for "repeat" and "continue" patch, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: Object binding comments wanted, Mark Hamburg
  • Re: New scoping rule for "repeat" and "continue" patch, Rici Lake
  • Lua 5.0.2 on a Nintendo DS Emulator, Zachary P. Landau
  • Re: Debugging coroutines question, Fabio Mascarenhas
  • Re: Debuggers for Lua???, Fabio Mascarenhas
• September 27, 2005
  • LUA Debugger Addin (Visual Studio), Zulfiqar Malik
  • Re: Debuggers for Lua???, Chris Marrin
  • Re: Memory leaks debugging, Shannon Stewman
• September 28, 2005
  • [newbie] terminal handling facilities, Jean-Rene David
  • Re: [newbie] terminal handling facilities, Aaron Brown
  • Re: [newbie] terminal handling facilities, Klaus Ripke
  • Re: [newbie] terminal handling facilities, Aaron Brown
  • Re: [newbie] terminal handling facilities, David Given
• September 29, 2005
  • Re: New scoping rule for "repeat" and "continue" patch, jrs
  • Re: New scoping rule for "repeat" and "continue" patch, Rici Lake
  • Re: LUA Debugger Addin (Visual Studio), Rici Lake
  • Re: New scoping rule for "repeat" and "continue" patch, Glenn Maynard
  • number metatable?, PA
  • Re: New scoping rule for "repeat" and "continue" patch, Rici Lake
  • Re: New scoping rule for "repeat" and "continue" patch, Glenn Maynard
  • RE: LUA Debugger Addin (Visual Studio), Zulfiqar Malik
  • Re: [newbie] terminal handling facilities, Klaus Ripke
  • Re: [newbie] terminal handling facilities, Glenn Maynard
  • Re: [newbie] terminal handling facilities, Klaus Ripke
  • Re: [newbie] terminal handling facilities, Glenn Maynard
  • Re: [newbie] terminal handling facilities, Doug Rogers
  • Re: [newbie] terminal handling facilities, Klaus Ripke
  • [OT] Re: [newbie] terminal handling facilities, Klaus Ripke
  • Re: [newbie] terminal handling facilities, Jean-Rene David
  • Re: [newbie] terminal handling facilities, Doug Rogers
  • Re: Debuggers for Lua???, Fabio Mascarenhas
  • Re: [newbie] terminal handling facilities, Aaron Brown
  • Re: New scoping rule for "repeat" and "continue" patch, Aaron Brown
  • Re: New scoping rule for "repeat" and "continue" patch, Mark Meijer
  • Re: Debuggers for Lua???, Chris Marrin
• September 30, 2005
  • Re: Debuggers for Lua???, Fabio Mascarenhas
  • Re: New scoping rule for "repeat" and "continue" patch, jrs
  • Re: Debuggers for Lua???, Fabio Mascarenhas
  • collectgarbage( "step" ) question, Mark Hamburg
  • Re: collectgarbage( "step" ) question, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: Debuggers for Lua???, Chris Marrin
  • Re: [newbie] terminal handling facilities, Chris Pressey
  • Re: [newbie] terminal handling facilities, Klaus Ripke
  • [tolua++] support multiple inehritance, Mildred
  • Re: [tolua++] support multiple inehritance, David Given
• October 01, 2005
  • Re: [tolua++] support multiple inehritance, Christian Vogler

---

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19