Re: LuaSocket, dispatch.lua and timeouts.

[Jorge Visca <xxopxe@...>]

Diego Nehab wrote:
> It should stop on the next timeout, right? When there will
> be no partial results.
But the socket is already closed after the first timeout, so it wont
issue timeouts anymore... It just hangs there on the next receive() and
does nothing. At least is what i see in my code. I'll try it in the
forwarder.lua, just in case i'm doing something stupid in my code :)

Jorge