Re: Is a Lua system easily embeddable?

[Andre de Leiradella <aleirade@...>]

KHMan wrote:
> [snip]
> Arf, don't mind me, my talk is very cheap. Since my position in this is 
> roughly neutral, I'm just here in this thread for the kicks. :-)

Don't worry. I don't think there are many others who think like me so 
I'm here also just for the kicks.

> I believe most people would agree that more flexible build options is a 
> plus. The much harder problem is getting it done. Who's going to do it? 
> What you really need now is a cunning plan[1]...

I'd love to give it a try, but I don't know exactly where to start. I'll 
study the whole package library more deeply and maybe I can come up with 
some way to replace it with minimum code to make modules think it's 
still there.

Yes, I already know of package.preload, but there are Lua code that must 
be handled.

> Good luck.

Thanks.

> . . .
>
> [1] Not trying to be disrespectful, this is a rather obvious reference 
> to a British BBC series, for those who did not get it