[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: require, module, globals and "magic"
- From: Duncan Cross <duncan.cross@...>
- Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 15:57:18 +0100
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Jerome Vuarand
<jerome.vuarand@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2010/8/16 Duncan Cross <duncan.cross@gmail.com>:
>> On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Jerome Vuarand <jerome.vuarand@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I don't think so. Unless I missed something, the current 5.2 is still
>>> in the same stage as the work1 version, with its "in env do" paradigm.
>>> Everything could change again.
>>
>> I believe that paradigm has been considered removed when _ENV was introduced:
>>
>> http://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2010-02/msg00753.html
>>
>> 'The construction "in env do ... end" is gone too...'
>
> That was my point, precisely. "module" might be reintroduced in a
> future workx version.
>
Oh, I see what you mean. Sorry for the noise.
-Duncan
- References:
- require, module, globals and "magic", Nevin Flanagan
- Re: require, module, globals and "magic", steve donovan
- Re: require, module, globals and "magic", Lorenzo Donati
- Re: require, module, globals and "magic", steve donovan
- Re: require, module, globals and "magic", steve donovan
- Re: require, module, globals and "magic", Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
- Re: require, module, globals and "magic", Petite Abeille
- Re: require, module, globals and "magic", Jerome Vuarand
- Re: require, module, globals and "magic", steve donovan
- Re: require, module, globals and "magic", Jerome Vuarand
- Re: require, module, globals and "magic", steve donovan
- Re: require, module, globals and "magic", Jerome Vuarand
- Re: require, module, globals and "magic", Duncan Cross
- Re: require, module, globals and "magic", Jerome Vuarand