lua-l archive

[Date Index] [Thread Index]

• August 01, 2010
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Stuart P. Bentley
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Sean Bolton
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Florian Weimer
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, M Joonas Pihlaja
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, phlnc8
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Jim Whitehead II
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, phlnc8
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Renato Maia
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Quae Quack
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Quae Quack
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, GrayFace
• August 02, 2010
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, phlnc8
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, phlnc8
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Miles Bader
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Nick Gammon
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Michal Kolodziejczyk
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Matthew Wild
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Michal Kolodziejczyk
  • Re: Linking LuaSocket statically, Jerome Vuarand
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Juris Kalnins
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Hakki Dogusan
  • bug in Lua 5.1.4 with GC, userdata and fenv, Francesco Abbate
  • RE: bug in Lua 5.1.4 with GC, userdata and fenv, Benoit Germain
  • Re: Linking LuaSocket statically, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: bug in Lua 5.1.4 with GC, userdata and fenv, Francesco Abbate
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Stuart P. Bentley
  • Re: Reducing Lua's Trusted Computing Base, Stuart P. Bentley
  • 5.2 bytecode verifier library, Stuart P. Bentley
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Javier Guerra Giraldez
  • Re: Linking LuaSocket statically, Diego Nehab
  • Re: C and Lua modules, Stuart P. Bentley
  • Re: 5.2 bytecode verifier library, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Duncan Cross
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, James Graves
  • Re: Linking LuaSocket statically, Jerome Vuarand
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Jerome Vuarand
  • Re: Linking LuaSocket statically, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Lua on googles app engine, Kriss@<a href="/cgi-bin/echo.cgi?XIXs.com">...</a>
• August 03, 2010
  • Re: Lua on googles app engine, sagasw
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Miles Bader
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Renato Maia
  • luaL_ref performance in Lua 5.2.0-work4, Joshua Jensen
  • Re: Lua on googles app engine, Alexander Gladysh
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, David Manura
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Geoff Leyland
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, steve donovan
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Geoff Leyland
  • Re: bug in Lua 5.1.4 with GC, userdata and fenv, Francesco Abbate
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Quae Quack
  • Bug in LuaSQLite 3, Ronny Dierckx
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, David Manura
  • Re: luaL_ref performance in Lua 5.2.0-work4, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: bug in Lua 5.1.4 with GC, userdata and fenv, Francesco Abbate
  • Re: luaL_ref performance in Lua 5.2.0-work4, Joshua Jensen
  • Re: bug in Lua 5.1.4 with GC, userdata and fenv, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Nevin Flanagan
  • Re: bug in Lua 5.1.4 with GC, userdata and fenv, Francesco Abbate
  • Re: bug in Lua 5.1.4 with GC, userdata and fenv, Miles Bader
• August 04, 2010
  • Re: Bug in LuaSQLite 3, Doug Currie
  • Re: bug in Lua 5.1.4 with GC, userdata and fenv, Francesco Abbate
  • Memory allocation error in lpeg v0.9, Cedric Mauclair
  • Re: Memory allocation error in lpeg v0.9, Linker
  • Re: Memory allocation error in lpeg v0.9, Cedric Mauclair
  • Re: Memory allocation error in lpeg v0.9, Romulo
  • Re: Memory allocation error in lpeg v0.9, Cedric Mauclair
  • Re: Memory allocation error in lpeg v0.9, Cedric Mauclair
  • Re: Memory allocation error in lpeg v0.9, Thomas Harning Jr.
  • Re: Memory allocation error in lpeg v0.9, Cedric Mauclair
  • Re: Memory allocation error in lpeg v0.9, steve donovan
  • Re: Memory allocation error in lpeg v0.9, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: Memory allocation error in lpeg v0.9, Cedric Mauclair
  • Re: Memory allocation error in lpeg v0.9, Enrico Colombini
  • LuaHPDF library, Cedric Mauclair
  • Lua 5.2 and LPeg, ftak29
  • Re: LuaHPDF library, Kurt Jung
  • [ANN] LuaGravity 0.6, Francisco Sant'anna
  • Re: Lua 5.2 and LPeg, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: Lua 5.2 and LPeg, ftak29
  • Tolua++ protected members, Anders Backman
  • Re: Lua 5.2 and LPeg, Roberto Ierusalimschy
• August 05, 2010
  • RE: Tolua++ protected members, Andrew Yount
  • Re: [ANN] LuaGravity 0.6, Chris Babcock
  • RE: Bug in LuaSQLite 3, Ronny Dierckx
  • Re: [ANN] LuaGravity 0.6, Francisco Sant'anna
  • IUP, popen & processes, Bob Hibberdine
  • Re: Bug in LuaSQLite 3, Doug Currie
  • RE: IUP, popen & processes, Antonio Scuri
  • Re: Bug in LuaSQLite 3, Florian Weimer
  • [ANN] Reactive Server Pages, Francisco Sant'anna
  • Re: [ANN] Reactive Server Pages, Tomas Guisasola Gorham
  • Re: [ANN] Reactive Server Pages, Francisco Sant'anna
  • Re: [ANN] Reactive Server Pages, Tomas Guisasola Gorham
  • Re: [ANN] Reactive Server Pages, Chris Babcock
  • Re: [ANN] Reactive Server Pages, Francisco Sant'anna
  • Re: [ANN] Reactive Server Pages, Chris Babcock
  • Re: [ANN] Reactive Server Pages, Henk Boom
  • Re: [ANN] Reactive Server Pages, Chris Babcock
  • Re: Bug in LuaSQLite 3, Doug Currie
  • C implementation of Generic For?, King, Mike
  • Re: [ANN] Reactive Server Pages, Vadim Peretokin
  • Re: LuaHPDF library, Tim Channon
  • Re: [ANN] Reactive Server Pages, Henk Boom
  • Re: C implementation of Generic For?, Patrick Donnelly
  • Re: [ANN] Reactive Server Pages, Chris Babcock
  • Re: [ANN] Reactive Server Pages, David Given
  • Re: [ANN] Reactive Server Pages, Robert G. Jakabosky
  • Re: [ANN] Reactive Server Pages, Henk Boom
  • Re: [ANN] Reactive Server Pages, Robert G. Jakabosky
• August 06, 2010
  • Re: [ANN] Reactive Server Pages, Chris Babcock
  • 强邀请你加入若比邻 , 强
  • Re: [ANN] Reactive Server Pages, Francisco Sant'anna
  • Re: LuaHPDF library, Cedric Mauclair
  • RE: IUP, popen & processes, Bob Hibberdine
  • RE: IUP, popen & processes, Benoit Germain
  • Re: [ANN] Reactive Server Pages, Tobias Käs
  • RE: IUP, popen & processes, Antonio Scuri
  • Re: RE: IUP, popen & processes, Ryan Pusztai
  • Re: IUP, popen & processes, steve donovan
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Petite Abeille
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Jonathan Castello
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Petite Abeille
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Jonathan Castello
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Petite Abeille
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Jonathan Castello
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Petite Abeille
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Jonathan Castello
  • Re: [ANN] Reactive Server Pages, Chris Babcock
  • RE: IUP, popen & processes, Antonio Scuri
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Petite Abeille
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Matthew Wild
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Petite Abeille
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Jonathan Castello
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Jonathan Castello
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Javier Guerra Giraldez
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Everett L Williams II
• August 07, 2010
  • Order of weak ref removal and __gc, Pablo Pissanetzky
  • newproxy surprise... anything else out there I should be worried about???, Erik Cassel
  • Re: newproxy surprise... anything else out there I should be worried about???, Matthew Wild
  • Re: newproxy surprise... anything else out there I should be worried about???, Erik Cassel
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Mark Hamburg
  • Re: newproxy surprise... anything else out there I should be worried about???, David Manura
  • Re: newproxy surprise... anything else out there I should be worried about???, Erik Cassel
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, David Manura
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Petri Häkkinen
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, steve donovan
  • Re: IUP, popen & processes, steve donovan
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Petite Abeille
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Petite Abeille
  • Typo in Reference Manual (Lua 5.2 work4), Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Petite Abeille
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, HyperHacker
  • Re: newproxy surprise... anything else out there I should be worried about???, HyperHacker
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Shmuel Zeigerman
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Petite Abeille
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, HyperHacker
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Mark Hamburg
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Everett L Williams II
  • a case for multiple environments - expressing modules more naturally, David Manura
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Everett L Williams II
  • Re: a case for multiple environments - expressing modules more naturally, Everett L Williams II
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Mark Hamburg
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Everett L Williams II
  • Re: [ANN] Reactive Server Pages, Francisco Sant'anna
  • package.loaded not a weak valued table? (5.2), David Manura
• August 08, 2010
  • Re: newproxy surprise... anything else out there I should be worried about???, Henk Boom
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Mark Hamburg
  • Initialized table construction function, Stuart P. Bentley
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Petri Häkkinen
  • LuaJIT 2 Beta 5, Alexander Gladysh
  • Re: LuaJIT 2 Beta 5, Mike Pall
  • LJ2 vs. math.random, Alexander Gladysh
  • Re: LJ2 vs. math.random, Mike Pall
  • Re: Initialized table construction function, Mark Hamburg
  • Re: a case for multiple environments - expressing modules more naturally, Florian Weimer
  • Re: Typo in Reference Manual (Lua 5.2 work4), Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Jonathan Castello
  • Re: Some comments on CPS control flow functions in Lua 5.2, Mark Hamburg
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Mark Hamburg
  • Re: LJ2 vs. math.random, Shawn Fox
  • newproxy, Mark Hamburg
  • Re: LJ2 vs. math.random, Mike Pall
  • Re: newproxy, Jonathan Castello
  • Re: newproxy, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: Order of weak ref removal and __gc, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: newproxy, Mark Hamburg
• August 09, 2010
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Everett L Williams II
  • SVG libraries, Stuart P. Bentley
  • Re: SVG libraries, Wesley Smith
  • RFE (reference manual): Documenting common Lua idiom t[#t+1]=value., Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: SVG libraries, Michal Kolodziejczyk
  • Re: Tolua++ protected members, Anders Backman
  • Re: Tolua++ protected members, Wesley Smith
  • Lua 5.2 environments and changing a loaded file environment, Patrick Donnelly
  • Re: Lua 5.2 environments and changing a loaded file environment, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: Lua 5.2 environments and changing a loaded file environment, Patrick Donnelly
  • Re: Lua 5.2 environments and changing a loaded file environment, Petite Abeille
  • Re: Lua 5.2 environments and changing a loaded file environment, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: Lua 5.2 environments and changing a loaded file environment, Olivier Galibert
  • Re: SVG libraries, Timothy Baldridge
  • Re: Order of weak ref removal and __gc, Pablo Pissanetzky
  • C++ exception handling, Gedalia Pasternak
• August 10, 2010
  • Re: Order of weak ref removal and __gc, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: a case for multiple environments - expressing modules more naturally, David Manura
  • Re: a case for multiple environments - expressing modules more naturally, David Manura
  • LUA training for Game Design, Peter Miller
  • Newbie question - regarding calling Lua functions from C/C++, wowbagger58-lua
  • Re: Newbie question - regarding calling Lua functions from C/C++, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: Newbie question - regarding calling Lua functions from C/C++, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • News on Nutria: Seawolf, Nemo and Remora, fernando
  • Re: a case for multiple environments - expressing modules more naturally, Shawn Fox
  • Re: a case for multiple environments - expressing modules more naturally, Miles Bader
  • Re: a case for multiple environments - expressing modules more naturally, Everett L Williams II
  • Re: Newbie question - regarding calling Lua functions from C/C++, Patrick Rapin
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, David Kastrup
  • Re: LUA training for Game Design, Henrique Becker
  • Registering Lua functions of loaded chunks., wowbagger58-lua
  • Re: Registering Lua functions of loaded chunks., Wesley Smith
  • Re: Registering Lua functions of loaded chunks., Jerome Vuarand
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Patrick Donnelly
  • Re: Registering Lua functions of loaded chunks., Shawn Fox
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Everett L Williams II
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, steve donovan
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Javier Guerra Giraldez
  • Re: LUA training for Game Design, Tim Mensch
  • Unofficial Lua FAQ needs update on upcoming 5.2 features?, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: a case for multiple environments - expressing modules more naturally, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Everett L Williams II
  • Re: a case for multiple environments - expressing modules more naturally, Shawn Fox
  • Re: a case for multiple environments - expressing modules more naturally, Patrick Donnelly
  • Re: Tolua++ protected members, Ariel Manzur
  • Re: a case for multiple environments - expressing modules more naturally, Everett L Williams II
  • Re: Order of weak ref removal and __gc, Pablo Pissanetzky
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Everett L Williams II
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Patrick Donnelly
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Everett L Williams II
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Peter Cawley
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Shawn Fox
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Peter Cawley
  • Re: Unofficial Lua FAQ needs update on upcoming 5.2 features?, David Manura
• August 11, 2010
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Everett L Williams II
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Everett L Williams II
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Everett L Williams II
  • Re: Unofficial Lua FAQ needs update on upcoming 5.2 features?, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Chris Babcock
  • RE: IUP, popen & processes, Bob Hibberdine
  • Re: Unofficial Lua FAQ needs update on upcoming 5.2 features?, steve donovan
  • Re: IUP, popen & processes, Peter Odding
  • [ANN] luaposix 5.1.6 released, Natanael Copa
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work4) now available, Everett L Williams II
  • Re: LUA training for Game Design, kenk
  • Re: Order of weak ref removal and __gc, Pablo Pissanetzky
• August 12, 2010
  • [ANN] LuaCue 1.0.0, Linus Sjögren
  • [ANN] luaposix 5.1.7 released, Natanael Copa
  • Re: [ANN] LuaCue 1.0.0, Linus Sjögren
  • Re: Order of weak ref removal and __gc, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • LuaInterface: returning tables, Eric Tetz
  • Re: Order of weak ref removal and __gc, Pablo Pissanetzky
  • Re: [ANN] patch-lua-5.1.4-1, nick ralabate
  • Re: [ANN] patch-lua-5.1.4-1, Dirk Feytons
  • Re: [ANN] patch-lua-5.1.4-1, Ted Unangst
• August 13, 2010
  • character positions in lua_Debug and other debug.getinfo design comments, David Manura
  • Re: a case for multiple environments - expressing modules more naturally, David Manura
  • Re: a case for multiple environments - expressing modules more naturally, Shawn Fox
  • Re: a case for multiple environments - expressing modules more naturally, steve donovan
  • Encrypt in Javascript and Decrypt in Lua, TRAN Trung Thanh
  • Re: Encrypt in Javascript and Decrypt in Lua, Michal Kottman
  • Re: Order of weak ref removal and __gc, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • luasnmp cross compiling, Simon Dittlmann
  • Re: Lua 5.2 environments and changing a loaded file environment, Henk Boom
  • Re: a case for multiple environments - expressing modules more naturally, Shawn Fox
  • Re: a case for multiple environments - expressing modules more naturally, Shawn Fox
  • Re: Lua 5.2 environments and changing a loaded file environment, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: luasnmp cross compiling, Petr Štetiar
• August 14, 2010
  • Invitation to connect on LinkedIn, Hao Wu
  • io.popen ioctl errors, Wesley Smith
• August 15, 2010
  • Re: io.popen ioctl errors, Ted Unangst
  • Lua 5.2 garbage collector, Shawn Fox
  • Re: Lua 5.2 garbage collector, Patrick Donnelly
  • Re: Lua 5.2 garbage collector, Drake Wilson
  • Re: Lua 5.2 garbage collector, Shawn Fox
  • Re: Lua 5.2 resource limits (was: Lua 5.2 garbage collector), Drake Wilson
  • LUA os.execute help, soly®
  • Re: LUA os.execute help, James Graves
  • Re: LUA os.execute help, Sean Conner
  • Re: LUA os.execute help, Gavin Wraith
  • Re: LUA os.execute help, Enrico Colombini
  • Re: Lua 5.2 garbage collector, Doug Rogers
  • Re: LUA os.execute help, HyperHacker
• August 16, 2010
  • require, module, globals and "magic", Nevin Flanagan
  • Will Cowling is out of the office., Will_Cowling
  • Re: Will Cowling is out of the office., Mike Panetta
  • Re: require, module, globals and "magic", steve donovan
  • Re: require, module, globals and "magic", Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: require, module, globals and "magic", steve donovan
  • How can I know whether it is in the "metamethod/C-call" before calling lua_yield ?, 云风
  • Re: require, module, globals and "magic", steve donovan
  • Re: require, module, globals and "magic", Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: require, module, globals and "magic", Petite Abeille
  • Re: require, module, globals and "magic", Jerome Vuarand
  • Re: require, module, globals and "magic", steve donovan
  • Re: require, module, globals and "magic", Jerome Vuarand
  • Re: require, module, globals and "magic", Petite Abeille
  • Re: require, module, globals and "magic", steve donovan
  • Re: require, module, globals and "magic", Jerome Vuarand
  • Preallocating lua string before pushing them on the stack (prevent double alloc / memcpy), Cuero Bugot
  • Re: Preallocating lua string before pushing them on the stack (prevent double alloc / memcpy), Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: require, module, globals and "magic", Duncan Cross
  • Re: Preallocating lua string before pushing them on the stack (prevent double alloc / memcpy), Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: require, module, globals and "magic", Jerome Vuarand
  • Re: Preallocating lua string before pushing them on the stack (prevent double alloc / memcpy), HyperHacker
  • RE: Preallocating lua string before pushing them on the stack (prevent double alloc / memcpy), Cuero Bugot
  • Re: require, module, globals and "magic", Duncan Cross
  • RE: Preallocating lua string before pushing them on the stack (prevent double alloc / memcpy), Cuero Bugot
  • Re: LuaInterface: returning tables, RJ Russell
  • Expression statements, Peyman
  • Re: Expression statements, Javier Guerra Giraldez
  • Re: Expression statements, Peter Cawley
  • Re: Preallocating lua string before pushing them on the stack (prevent double alloc / memcpy), Shawn Fox
  • Re: Expression statements, Peyman
  • Re: Expression statements, RJ Russell
  • Re: Expression statements, Jonathan Castello
  • Re: Expression statements, KHMan
  • Re: Expression statements, Peyman
  • Re: Expression statements, Wesley Smith
  • Re: Expression statements, Jonathan Castello
  • Re: Expression statements, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: Expression statements, Jonathan Castello
  • Re: Expression statements, Jonathan Castello
  • Re: Expression statements, Peyman
  • Re: Expression statements, Shaun McVey
  • Re: Expression statements, Jonathan Castello
  • Re: Expression statements, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: Expression statements, taco
  • Re: Expression statements, Peyman
  • Re: Expression statements, Jonathan Castello
  • Re: Expression statements, Sean Conner
  • Re: Expression statements, Alex Queiroz
  • Re: Expression statements, Jonathan Castello
  • Re: Expression statements, Jonathan Castello
  • Re: Order of weak ref removal and __gc, Pablo Pissanetzky
  • Re: Expression statements, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: Expression statements, Jonathan Castello
  • Re: Expression statements, Martin Guy
  • Re: Expression statements, Jonathan Castello
  • Re: SVG libraries, Philippe Lhoste
  • LPeg 0.9 bug (works in 0.8.1), Brian Downing
  • Re: Expression statements, David Given
  • Re: Expression statements, David Manura
  • Re: require, module, globals and "magic", Miles Bader
• August 17, 2010
  • Re: How can I know whether it is in the "metamethod/C-call" before calling lua_yield ?, Hu Qiwei
  • Re: How can I know whether it is in the "metamethod/C-call" before calling lua_yield ?, 云风
  • Re: require, module, globals and "magic", David Manura
  • Re: require, module, globals and "magic", steve donovan
  • [ANN] lpty 0.8-1, Gunnar Zötl
  • Re: [ANN] lpty 0.8-1, steve donovan
  • Re: require, module, globals and "magic", Richard Hundt
  • reinstating "in env do ... end", Richard Hundt
  • Re: [ANN] lpty 0.8-1, Jeff Pohlmeyer
  • Re: require, module, globals and "magic", Richard Hundt
  • Dotnet assemby from C Lua, Dušan Majkić
  • Re: reinstating "in env do ... end", Duncan Cross
  • Re: Re: [ANN] lpty 0.8-1, Gunnar Zötl
  • Re: [ANN] lpty 0.8-1, Philipp Janda
  • Re: Re: [ANN] lpty 0.8-1, Gunnar Zötl
  • Re: Dotnet assemby from C Lua, steve donovan
  • Re: LPeg 0.9 bug (works in 0.8.1), Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: reinstating "in env do ... end", Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: [ANN] lpty 0.8-1, Jerome Vuarand
  • Re: Re: [ANN] lpty 0.8-1, Gunnar Zötl
  • cross-compile alien, Martin
  • Re: reinstating "in env do ... end", Stuart P. Bentley
  • Re: cross-compile alien, steve donovan
  • Re: cross-compile alien, Fabio Mascarenhas
  • Idea for 5.2 : merging _ENV and ... (was: Re: reinstating "in env do ... end"), Jerome Vuarand
  • pairs & ipairs as first-class loops, Stuart P. Bentley
  • Re: pairs & ipairs as first-class loops, Joshua Jensen
  • Luarocks root_dir is nil, Thijs Koerselman
  • Basic, no fuss, no magic, foolproof module pattern. [Was: require, module, globals and "magic"], Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: [ANN] lpty 0.8-1, Ed
  • Re: Luarocks root_dir is nil, Thijs Koerselman
  • Re: [ANN] lpty 0.8-1, Ed
  • Re: Luarocks root_dir is nil, steve donovan
  • Re: Basic, no fuss, no magic, foolproof module pattern. [Was: require, module, globals and "magic"], Matthias Kluwe
  • Re: reinstating "in env do ... end", Richard Hundt
  • Re: [ANN] lpty 0.8-1, Gunnar Zötl
  • Re: Luarocks root_dir is nil, Hisham
  • [ANN] lpty 0.8-2, Gunnar Zötl
  • Re: Idea for 5.2 : merging _ENV and ... (was: Re: reinstating "in env do ... end"), Richard Hundt
  • Re: [ANN] lpty 0.8-1, Ed
  • Re: Luarocks root_dir is nil, Thijs Koerselman
  • Re: Dotnet assemby from C Lua, Dušan Majkić
  • Re: Dotnet assemby from C Lua, Pablo Garcia
  • Re: Idea for 5.2 : merging _ENV and ... (was: Re: reinstating "in env do ... end"), Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: Basic, no fuss, no magic, foolproof module pattern. [Was: require, module, globals and "magic"], Sean Conner
  • Re: Idea for 5.2 : merging _ENV and ... (was: Re: reinstating "in env do ... end"), Gé Weijers
  • Re: Idea for 5.2 : merging _ENV and ... (was: Re: reinstating "in env do ... end"), Richard Hundt
  • Re: Idea for 5.2 : merging _ENV and ... (was: Re: reinstating "in env do ... end"), Richard Hundt
  • Re: Idea for 5.2 : merging _ENV and ... (was: Re: reinstating "in env do ... end"), Richard Hundt
  • Re: Basic, no fuss, no magic, foolproof module pattern. [Was: require, module, globals and "magic"], Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: Dotnet assemby from C Lua, Dušan Majkić
• August 18, 2010
  • Re: Lua Semantic Highlighting for Emacs, Petr Štetiar
  • Re: Lua Semantic Highlighting for Emacs, steve donovan
  • Re: Lua Semantic Highlighting for Emacs, Peter Odding
  • Audience for globals discussion?, Patrick McCavery
  • Re: Audience for globals discussion?, Rob Kendrick
  • Re: Audience for globals discussion?, steve donovan
  • Lua semantic higlighting for Vim [Was: Re: Lua Semantic Highlighting for Emacs], Petr Štetiar
  • Re: Audience for globals discussion?, Patrick McCavery
  • Re: Idea for 5.2 : merging _ENV and ... (was: Re: reinstating "in env do ... end"), Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: Lua semantic higlighting for Vim [Was: Re: Lua Semantic Highlighting for Emacs], Peter Odding
  • Re: Basic, no fuss, no magic, foolproof module pattern. [Was: require, module, globals and "magic"], Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: Audience for globals discussion?, Matthew Wild
  • Re: Audience for globals discussion?, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: Audience for globals discussion?, Peter Odding
  • Re: Audience for globals discussion?, Peter Hickman
  • Re: Audience for globals discussion?, Petite Abeille
  • Re: Basic, no fuss, no magic, foolproof module pattern. [Was: require, module, globals and "magic"], Petite Abeille
  • Re: Lua semantic higlighting for Vim [Was: Re: Lua Semantic Highlighting for Emacs], Petr Štetiar
  • Re: Audience for globals discussion?, Matthew Wild
  • Re: Audience for globals discussion?, Peter Hickman
  • Re: Lua semantic higlighting for Vim [Was: Re: Lua Semantic Highlighting for Emacs], Peter Odding
  • Re: Lua semantic higlighting for Vim [Was: Re: Lua Semantic Highlighting for Emacs], Petr Štetiar
  • Re: Lua semantic higlighting for Vim [Was: Re: Lua Semantic Highlighting for Emacs], Petr Štetiar
  • Re: Audience for globals discussion?, Vadim Peretokin
  • lpeg: subset of a grammar, Andreas Matthias
  • Re: lpeg: subset of a grammar, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: cross-compile alien, Martin
  • Re: Lua semantic higlighting for Vim [Was: Re: Lua Semantic Highlighting for Emacs], David Manura
  • Re: Basic, no fuss, no magic, foolproof module pattern. [Was: require, module, globals and "magic"], Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: Basic, no fuss, no magic, foolproof module pattern. [Was: require, module, globals and "magic"], Matthew Wild
  • Re: Basic, no fuss, no magic, foolproof module pattern. [Was: require, module, globals and "magic"], Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: Basic, no fuss, no magic, foolproof module pattern. [Was: require, module, globals and "magic"], Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: Basic, no fuss, no magic, foolproof module pattern. [Was: require, module, globals and "magic"], Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: Basic, no fuss, no magic, foolproof module pattern. [Was: require, module, globals and "magic"], Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: Basic, no fuss, no magic, foolproof module pattern. [Was: require, module, globals and "magic"], Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: cross-compile alien, Fabio Mascarenhas
  • Re: Basic, no fuss, no magic, foolproof module pattern. [Was: require, module, globals and "magic"], Matthew Wild
  • Re: Basic, no fuss, no magic, foolproof module pattern. [Was: require, module, globals and "magic"], Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: lpeg: subset of a grammar, Andreas Matthias
  • Re: Basic, no fuss, no magic, foolproof module pattern. [Was: require, module, globals and "magic"], Javier Guerra Giraldez
  • Re: Basic, no fuss, no magic, foolproof module pattern. [Was: require, module, globals and "magic"], Lorenzo Donati
• August 19, 2010
  • Re: lpeg: subset of a grammar, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: Audience for globals discussion?, steve donovan
  • Re: Lua semantic higlighting for Vim [Was: Re: Lua Semantic Highlighting for Emacs], Petr Štetiar
  • Re: Lua semantic higlighting for Vim [Was: Re: Lua Semantic Highlighting for Emacs], Peter Odding
  • Re: Lua semantic higlighting for Vim [Was: Re: Lua Semantic Highlighting for Emacs], Petr Štetiar
  • lua-users.org planned outage, John Belmonte
  • Lua.org downtime, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: lua-users.org planned outage, Rob Kendrick
  • Re: luasnmp cross compiling, Simon Dittlmann
  • Re: Lua semantic higlighting for Vim [Was: Re: Lua Semantic Highlighting for Emacs], Peter Odding
  • Re: Audience for globals discussion?, Kevin Vermeer
  • Lua 5.2 work4 compile lua as a whole with a single file, Jose Luis Hidalgo
  • Re: Audience for globals discussion?, Matthew Wild
  • Re: Lua 5.2 work4 compile lua as a whole with a single file, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: cross-compile alien, Martin
• August 20, 2010
  • Re: Basic, no fuss, no magic, foolproof module pattern. [Was: require, module, globals and "magic"], Quae Quack
  • Re: Basic, no fuss, no magic, foolproof module pattern. [Was: require, module, globals and "magic"], Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: cross-compile alien, steve donovan
  • The 'ex' library, Bob Hibberdine
  • Re: cross-compile alien, Ross Berteig
• August 21, 2010
  • Re: cross-compile alien, Martin
  • Re: cross-compile alien, steve donovan
  • Is Lua 5.2-work4's loadin function too strict?, Peter Cawley
  • Re: The 'ex' library, Philippe Lhoste
  • Re: Is Lua 5.2-work4's loadin function too strict?, Stuart P. Bentley
  • Re: Is Lua 5.2-work4's loadin function too strict?, Matthew Wild
  • Bug in 5.2-work4's loadin when loading chunks with no upvalues?, Peter Cawley
  • traceback and error handling pitfalls (5.2), David Manura
  • Rerun of the same chunk via lua_pcall, Joachim Buermann
  • Re: Rerun of the same chunk via lua_pcall, Duncan Cross
  • Re: Rerun of the same chunk via lua_pcall, Joachim Buermann
  • Re: Rerun of the same chunk via lua_pcall, Jonathan Castello
  • Re: Rerun of the same chunk via lua_pcall, Joachim Buermann
  • Bytecode abuse in Lua 5.2 (-work4), Peter Cawley
• August 22, 2010
  • Re: Bytecode abuse in Lua 5.2 (-work4), Majic
  • Re: Bytecode abuse in Lua 5.2 (-work4), Martin Guy
  • Re: Bytecode abuse in Lua 5.2 (-work4), HyperHacker
  • Re: Bytecode abuse in Lua 5.2 (-work4), Joshua Jensen
  • Re: Bytecode abuse in Lua 5.2 (-work4), Jonathan Castello
  • Re: Bytecode abuse in Lua 5.2 (-work4), Joshua Jensen
  • Re: Bytecode abuse in Lua 5.2 (-work4), Martin Guy
  • Re: Bytecode abuse in Lua 5.2 (-work4), KHMan
  • Re: Bytecode abuse in Lua 5.2 (-work4), HyperHacker
  • Re: Bytecode abuse in Lua 5.2 (-work4), Peter Cawley
  • Re: Bytecode abuse in Lua 5.2 (-work4), KHMan
  • Re: Bytecode abuse in Lua 5.2 (-work4), Stuart P. Bentley
  • Re: Bytecode abuse in Lua 5.2 (-work4), Stuart P. Bentley
  • Re: Bytecode abuse in Lua 5.2 (-work4), HyperHacker
  • Why nobody talks about Lua, liam mail
  • Re: lua-users.org planned outage, Doug Currie
  • Re: Why nobody talks about Lua, Patrick McCavery
  • Re: lua-users.org planned outage, John Belmonte
  • Re: Bytecode abuse in Lua 5.2 (-work4), Matthew Wild
  • Re: Bytecode abuse in Lua 5.2 (-work4), HyperHacker
• August 23, 2010
  • Re: Why nobody talks about Lua, Stuart P. Bentley
  • Re: Bytecode abuse in Lua 5.2 (-work4), Henk Boom
  • Re: Bytecode abuse in Lua 5.2 (-work4), KHMan
  • Re: Bytecode abuse in Lua 5.2 (-work4), Jim Whitehead II
  • Re: lua-users.org planned outage, Daniel Silverstone
  • Re: lua-users.org planned outage, John Belmonte
  • Re: Lua.org downtime, Rob Kendrick
  • Re: lua-users.org planned outage, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: lua-users.org planned outage, Erik Hougaard
  • Re: lua-users.org planned outage, Enrico Colombini
  • Re: Bytecode abuse in Lua 5.2 (-work4), Duncan Cross
  • Safe navigation operator, Cuero Bugot
  • Re: lua-users.org planned outage, Daniel Silverstone
  • Re: Safe navigation operator, Wesley Smith
  • Re: Safe navigation operator, Matthew Wild
  • RE: Safe navigation operator, Cuero Bugot
  • RE: Safe navigation operator, Cuero Bugot
  • Re: Safe navigation operator, Duncan Cross
  • Re: Safe navigation operator, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: Safe navigation operator, Wesley Smith
  • Re: Bytecode abuse in Lua 5.2 (-work4), Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: Safe navigation operator, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • RE: Safe navigation operator, Cuero Bugot
  • Re: Safe navigation operator, Wesley Smith
  • Re: Safe navigation operator, Juris Kalnins
  • RE: Safe navigation operator, Cuero Bugot
  • Re: Safe navigation operator, Duncan Cross
  • Re: Safe navigation operator, Julien Cugnière
  • RE: Safe navigation operator, Cuero Bugot
  • Re: Safe navigation operator, Wesley Smith
  • RE: Safe navigation operator, Cuero Bugot
  • Re: Safe navigation operator, HyperHacker
  • Re: Safe navigation operator, Tony Finch
  • Re: Safe navigation operator, Juris Kalnins
  • Re: Safe navigation operator, Jerome Vuarand
  • Re: Safe navigation operator, Matthew Wild
  • Re: Safe navigation operator, Petite Abeille
  • RE: Safe navigation operator, Cuero Bugot
  • Re: Safe navigation operator, Romulo
  • Re: Safe navigation operator, Mark Hamburg
  • Re: Bytecode abuse in Lua 5.2 (-work4), John Passaniti
  • Re: Bytecode abuse in Lua 5.2 (-work4), Florian Weimer
  • Re: Safe navigation operator, HyperHacker
  • Re: Bug in 5.2-work4's loadin when loading chunks with no upvalues?, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: Is Lua 5.2-work4's loadin function too strict?, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • [ANN] tamale - pattern matching library, Scott Vokes
  • Re: Bug in 5.2-work4's loadin when loading chunks with no upvalues?, Patrick Donnelly
  • Re: Bug in 5.2-work4's loadin when loading chunks with no upvalues?, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • sscanf like in Lua, Jose Marin
  • Re: sscanf like in Lua, Ted Unangst
  • Re: sscanf like in Lua, Wesley Smith
  • Re: sscanf like in Lua, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: sscanf like in Lua, Enrico Colombini
  • Re: sscanf like in Lua, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • modules and locals, Andreas Matthias
  • Re: modules and locals, Jonathan Castello
  • Re: modules and locals, Rob Hoelz
  • Re: modules and locals, Drake Wilson
  • Re: modules and locals, Andreas Matthias
  • Re: modules and locals, Jonathan Castello
  • Re: Safe navigation operator, Matthew Wild
• August 24, 2010
  • Syntax Sugar in Lua 5.2, RJ Russell
  • Re: Syntax Sugar in Lua 5.2, Jonathan Castello
  • Re: Syntax Sugar in Lua 5.2, Daniel Aquino
  • Re: Syntax Sugar in Lua 5.2, Jonathan Castello
  • Re: modules and locals, HyperHacker
  • broken link at lua-users.org/wiki, lua
  • Re: modules and locals, Drake Wilson
  • Re: Syntax Sugar in Lua 5.2, David Manura
  • Re: sscanf like in Lua, Michal Kolodziejczyk
  • Re: sscanf like in Lua, Michal Kolodziejczyk
  • Re: sscanf like in Lua, steve donovan
  • RE: Safe navigation operator, Cuero Bugot
  • Re: Syntax Sugar in Lua 5.2, Dušan Majkić
  • Re: sscanf like in Lua, Enrico Colombini
  • Re: Luarocks root_dir is nil, steve donovan
  • Re: Safe navigation operator, Romulo
  • Re: sscanf like in Lua, Jose Marin
  • Re: modules and locals, Andreas Matthias
  • [ANN] LuaJIT-2.0.0-beta5, Mike Pall
  • Re: modules and locals, Jerome Vuarand
• August 28, 2010
  • new list, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Will Cowling is out of the office., Will_Cowling
  • Re: new list, Alexander Gladysh
  • Re: new list, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • New mailing list notice seen as "junk" by gmail, Jeff Pohlmeyer
  • Re: modules and locals, Florian Weimer
  • Re: New mailing list notice seen as "junk" by gmail, Peter Cawley
  • Re: New mailing list notice seen as "junk" by gmail, Alexandre Erwin Ittner
  • Re: New mailing list notice seen as "junk" by gmail, Enrico Colombini
  • Re: new list, Shmuel Zeigerman
  • Re: new list, Jörg Walter
  • Re: new list, Patrick Donnelly
  • Re: new list, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: new list, clemens fischer
  • Re: new list, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • LuaBatteries.org ?, Patrick McCavery
  • problem with weak table and finalized objects, Francesco Abbate
  • again: problem with weak table and finalized objects, Francesco Abbate
  • Re: LuaBatteries.org ?, Reuben Thomas
  • Re: New mailing list notice seen as "junk" by gmail, Chris Babcock
  • JSON module, David Kolf
  • Re: JSON module, Javier Guerra Giraldez
  • Re: JSON module, Jonathan Castello
  • Re: LuaBatteries.org ?, Chris Babcock
• August 29, 2010
  • Re: LuaBatteries.org ?, Duncan Cross
  • Re: JSON module, gary ng
  • Re: LuaBatteries.org ?, Patrick McCavery
  • Re: LuaBatteries.org ?, Patrick McCavery
  • Re: LuaBatteries.org ?, Patrick McCavery
  • Pretty-printers for XML and JSON, Alexander Gladysh
  • Re: Pretty-printers for XML and JSON, Yang Fan
  • Re: Pretty-printers for XML and JSON, Alexander Gladysh
  • Re: LuaBatteries.org ?, steve donovan
  • RungeKutta, WalshTransform and Evol, pj
  • Re: RungeKutta, WalshTransform and Evol, steve donovan
  • Re: JSON module, steve donovan
  • Is this a temporary list?, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: Is this a temporary list?, Florian Weimer
  • Re: Is this a temporary list?, Lorenzo Donati
  • Lua and computer language history, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: Is this a temporary list?, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • assert place, Jean-Yves F. Barbier
  • Re: again: problem with weak table and finalized objects, Luis Carvalho
  • please remove me from this list, Nayana Datta
  • Re: problem with weak table and finalized objects, Romulo
  • Re: problem with weak table and finalized objects, Julio José Mora Salido
  • Re: assert place, Filipe Tomé
  • Re: please remove me from this list, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: please remove me from this list, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: Lua and computer language history, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: please remove me from this list, Erik Hougaard
  • Re: problem with weak table and finalized objects, Mark Hamburg
  • Re: problem with weak table and finalized objects, Francesco Abbate
  • Please remove me from this list, Francesco Puca
  • Re: problem with weak table and finalized objects, Francesco Abbate
  • Re: again: problem with weak table and finalized objects, Francesco Abbate
  • Please remove me from this list, Daniel Brodie
  • Re: problem with weak table and finalized objects, Mark Hamburg
  • Re: problem with weak table and finalized objects, Francesco Abbate
  • Re: please remove me from this list, Michael Wyman
  • Re: please remove me from this list, Jonathan Castello
  • Re: please remove me from this list, Alejandro Mery
  • Re: please remove me from this list, Jonathan Castello
  • Re: please remove me from this list, Joshua Haberman
  • Re: please remove me from this list, Nathan
  • Re: please remove me from this list, michel
  • Re: please remove me from this list, Patrick Stinson
  • Re: please remove me from this list, michel
  • Re: please remove me from this list, Philippe Lhoste
  • Re: please remove me from this list, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: please remove me from this list, Peter Odding
  • Re: RungeKutta, WalshTransform and Evol, Chris Babcock
  • Re: please remove me from this list, Thomas Harning Jr.
  • Re: please remove me from this list, Joe Finn
  • Re: please remove me from this list, Chris Babcock
  • Re: New mailing list notice seen as "junk" by gmail, Peter Cawley
  • C vs LuaJit, Patrick McCavery
  • Re: C vs LuaJit, Joe Finn
  • Re: C vs LuaJit, Alex Stup
  • Re: C vs LuaJit, malkia
  • Re: C vs LuaJit, Mike Pall
  • Re: C vs LuaJit, Jean-Yves F. Barbier
  • Re: C vs LuaJit, Alex Stup
  • Re: C vs LuaJit, Jean-Yves F. Barbier
  • Re: C vs LuaJit, Miles Bader
  • Re: C vs LuaJit, Jean-Yves F. Barbier
  • mailing list misconfiguration, Miles Bader
  • Re: again: problem with weak table and finalized objects, Luis Carvalho
  • Re: mailing list misconfiguration, Jonathan Castello
  • Re: mailing list misconfiguration, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: RungeKutta, WalshTransform and Evol, pj
  • Re: mailing list misconfiguration, Jean-Yves F. Barbier
  • Re: mailing list misconfiguration, Miles Bader
• August 30, 2010
  • Re: Please remove me from this list, hard wyrd
  • Re: C vs LuaJit, Mike Pall
  • Re: C vs LuaJit, Jean-Yves F. Barbier
  • Re: Please remove me from this list, bswee1
  • Re: C vs LuaJit, Joe Finn
  • Re: Please remove me from this list, Gabriel Voigt
  • Re: Please remove me from this list, Joe Finn
  • Re: C vs LuaJit, Patrick McCavery
  • Re: C vs LuaJit, KHMan
  • Re: C vs LuaJit, Miles Bader
  • Re: Please remove me from this list, Henk Boom
  • Re: C vs LuaJit, Joe Finn
  • Re: new list, Zark Yoc
  • Re: C vs LuaJit, John Passaniti
  • Re: LPeg 0.9 bug (works in 0.8.1), Nick Gammon
  • Re: C vs LuaJit, Vyacheslav Egorov
  • Re: Please remove me from this list, Natanael Copa
  • Re: Please remove me from this list, Alexander Gladysh
  • Re: Please remove me from this list, federico ziberna
  • Re: RungeKutta, WalshTransform and Evol, steve donovan
  • Re: Pretty-printers for XML and JSON, steve donovan
  • please remove me from this list, ALTEN - MARQUES, Emanuel
  • Re: please remove me from this list, chandra.shekarj
  • Re: please remove me from this list, V.N. Raju
  • please remove me from this list, Jean-Luc BRUANT
  • Re: please remove me from this list, Bogdan Marinescu
  • Re: C vs LuaJit, Mike Pall
  • Re: please remove me from this list, Jean-Yves F. Barbier
  • Re: please remove me from this list, Miles Bader
  • Re: C vs LuaJit, Mike Pall
  • Re: C vs LuaJit, Mike Pall
  • Re: C vs LuaJit, Stefan Sandberg
  • Re: C vs LuaJit, Vyacheslav Egorov
  • Re: Pretty-printers for XML and JSON, Matthew Wild
  • Re: JSON module, Ed
  • Re: JSON module, Ed
  • Re: C vs LuaJit, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: please remove me from this list, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: RungeKutta, WalshTransform and Evol, Dado Sutter
  • Please remove me from list, l.a.pereira
  • Re: C vs LuaJit, Mike Pall
  • Re: C vs LuaJit, Mark Hamburg
  • Re: Please remove me from list, Alejandro Mery
  • Re: C vs LuaJit, Vyacheslav Egorov
  • Re: please remove me from this list, Carolyn Ann Grant
  • Re: please remove me from this list, l.a.pereira
  • Re: please remove me from this list, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: please remove me from this list, Alejandro Mery
  • Doubt, Enrico Colombini
  • Re: Doubt, Pablo Pissanetzky
  • Re: Doubt, Pablo Carneiro Elias
  • Re: Doubt, Jean-Yves F. Barbier
  • Re: Doubt, KHMan
  • Re: mailing list misconfiguration, GrayFace
  • Re: Doubt, Florian Weimer
  • Re: RungeKutta, WalshTransform and Evol, Chris Babcock
  • string fnct don't work with accentuated, Jean-Yves F. Barbier
  • Re: string fnct don't work with accentuated, Chris Babcock
  • Re: string fnct don't work with accentuated, Jean-Yves F. Barbier
• August 31, 2010
  • Re: mailing list misconfiguration, Miles Bader
  • Re: C vs LuaJit, Pan Shi Zhu
  • Re: string fnct don't work with accentuated, Chris Babcock
  • Fwd: lua check file, soly man
  • Re: lua check file, Alessandro Delgado
  • Re: LuaBatteries.org ?, David Manura
  • Re: Fwd: lua check file, Philippe Lhoste
  • Re: C vs LuaJit, steve donovan
  • Re: JSON module, David Kolf
  • Re: RungeKutta, WalshTransform and Evol, steve donovan
  • Re: Lua and computer language history, Nick Gammon
  • Re: C vs LuaJit, Pan Shi Zhu
  • Re: C vs LuaJit, Rene Rebe
  • Re: C vs LuaJit, Pan Shi Zhu
  • Re: New mailing list notice seen as "junk" by gmail, Daniel Silverstone
  • Re: C vs LuaJit, KHMan
  • Re: C vs LuaJit, Patrick McCavery
  • Re: JSON module, Jerome Vuarand
  • Re: C vs LuaJit, Rene Rebe
  • Lua Modules Development List (was Re: LuaBatteries.org ?), steve donovan
  • Re: mailing list misconfiguration, Kevin Vermeer
  • Re: mailing list misconfiguration, Miles Bader
  • Re: mailing list misconfiguration, Kevin Vermeer
  • Re: RungeKutta, WalshTransform and Evol, Hisham
  • LBCI replacement for LuaJIT 2, Alexander Gladysh
  • Re: C vs LuaJit, Leo Razoumov
  • Re: LBCI replacement for LuaJIT 2, Mike Pall
  • Re: LBCI replacement for LuaJIT 2, Alexander Gladysh
  • Tail Calls for C Functions, Patrick Donnelly

---

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19