[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: C vs LuaJit
- From: Vyacheslav Egorov <mister.aleph@...>
- Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 16:07:09 +0200
Mike Pall wrote:
> Now we're coming full circle.
Yes I understand that. Abstract interpretation has to follow all[*]
paths while tracing JIT has to follow only "really important" paths
which are actually executed.
[*] well many static optimisations done in JIT can be combined with
profile even if that profile is not as fine grained as tracing
produces. this might reduce overall problem size.
--
e.v.e
- References:
- C vs LuaJit, Patrick McCavery
- Re: C vs LuaJit, Joe Finn
- Re: C vs LuaJit, Jean-Yves F. Barbier
- Re: C vs LuaJit, Alex Stup
- Re: C vs LuaJit, Jean-Yves F. Barbier
- Re: C vs LuaJit, Miles Bader
- Re: C vs LuaJit, Mike Pall
- Re: C vs LuaJit, Vyacheslav Egorov
- Re: C vs LuaJit, Mike Pall
- Re: C vs LuaJit, Vyacheslav Egorov
- Re: C vs LuaJit, Mike Pall