[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: LuaJIT strange memory limit
- From: Alexander Gladysh <agladysh@...>
- Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 21:32:34 +0300
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 06:06, Linker <linker.m.lin@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 08:11, Alexander Gladysh <agladysh@gmail.com> wrote:
>> We use LJ2 on server side. And we both know another guy, who used it. ;-)
>> LJ2 is quite suitable for server side. But, alas, not for every
>> conceivable server program architecture.
> I cannot agree with you. The memory limit is not a problem, if you select
> the multi-processes architecture for your servers.It had been used in my
> servers for many years.
And why does not this agree with what I said?
Alexander.
- References:
- Re: LuaJIT strange memory limit, Arseny Vakhrushev
- Re: LuaJIT strange memory limit, Alexander Gladysh
- Re: LuaJIT strange memory limit, Arseny Vakhrushev
- Re: LuaJIT strange memory limit, Mike Pall
- Re: LuaJIT strange memory limit, Arseny Vakhrushev
- Re: LuaJIT strange memory limit, Mike Pall
- Re: LuaJIT strange memory limit, Arseny Vakhrushev
- Re: LuaJIT strange memory limit, Mike Pall
- Re: LuaJIT strange memory limit, Arseny Vakhrushev
- Re: LuaJIT strange memory limit, Alexander Gladysh
- Re: LuaJIT strange memory limit, Linker