Re: Porting Lua to Windows Mobile Professional 6.5.3

[Marc Balmer <marc@...>]

Am 02.06.2011 15:40, schrieb Reuben Thomas:
> On 2 June 2011 10:07, Marc Balmer<marc@msys.ch>  wrote:
> > LGPL is not acceptable due to the condition that an end user must be
> > able to link against newer versions of a library.
>
> That's a new one on me! Reference? I can't find anything about a
> problem like this...

Section 4, subsection d, of the LGPL.

http://www.gnu.org/licenses/lgpl-3.0-standalone.html