lua-l archive

[Date Index] [Thread Index]

• June 01, 2011
  • Re: pattern nick name table, would it be handy?, Wesley Smith
  • Re: pattern nick name table, would it be handy?, Daurnimator
  • Iterators and the Generic 'for', Dirk Laurie
  • Question about embedded Lua and accessibility of libaries, marbux
  • Re: Question about embedded Lua and accessibility of libaries, steve donovan
  • Re: Question about embedded Lua and accessibility of libaries, marbux
  • Re: Iterators and the Generic 'for', Duncan Cross
  • Re: Question about embedded Lua and accessibility of libaries, Shmuel Zeigerman
  • Re: Question about embedded Lua and accessibility of libaries, steve donovan
  • Simple classes, Jose Marin
  • Re: Simple classes, Rebel Neurofog
  • Metamethods as weak reference?, Chris Redden
  • Re: pattern nick name table, would it be handy?, Pierre-Yves Gérardy
  • Re: Simple classes, Jose Marin
  • Re: Iterators and the Generic 'for', Dirk Laurie
  • Re: Simple classes, Michal Kolodziejczyk
  • Re: Simple classes, steve donovan
  • Re: Simple classes, Jose Marin
  • Re: Metamethods as weak reference?, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: Simple classes, Pierre-Yves Gérardy
  • Re: pattern nick name table, would it be handy?, Patrick Mc(avery
  • Incremental parsing with LPEG, Greg
  • Re: Incremental parsing with LPEG, steve donovan
  • Re: Incremental parsing with LPEG, KHMan
  • Re: Metamethods as weak reference?, Chris Redden
  • Re: Metamethods as weak reference?, Chris Redden
  • Re: Iterators and the Generic 'for', Mark Hamburg
  • Re: Incremental parsing with LPEG, Greg
  • Re: Metamethods as weak reference?, Chris Redden
  • Doubt about ebnf parser using lpeg., Cleverton Hentz
  • Re: Incremental parsing with LPEG, Greg
  • help installing lua-gd, glen worstell
  • Re: Incremental parsing with LPEG, KHMan
  • Re: help installing lua-gd, Alexandre Erwin Ittner
  • Re: help installing lua-gd, Alexandre Erwin Ittner
  • Re: Doubt about ebnf parser using lpeg., Tony Finch
  • [ANN] Lua for Windows v5.1.4-42 Released, RJP Computing
  • help about pattern-matching, Igor Medeiros
  • Re: help about pattern-matching, Tony Finch
  • Re: help about pattern-matching, Dirk Laurie
  • Re: help about pattern-matching, Igor Medeiros
  • Re: [ann] Lua 1.0-alpha For IntelliJ IDEA And Other JetBrains Products, Patrick Rapin
  • Re: [ann] Lua 1.0-alpha For IntelliJ IDEA And Other JetBrains Products, Pierre-Yves Gérardy
  • LunarDroid - A REAL port of LUA to the Android Platform, Cleuton Sampaio
  • Re: LunarDroid - A REAL port of LUA to the Android Platform, Reuben Thomas
  • Re: LunarDroid - A REAL port of LUA to the Android Platform, Gabriel Duarte
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] more luaL_check* in lauxlib.h (for Lua 5.2), HyperHacker
• June 02, 2011
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] more luaL_check* in lauxlib.h (for Lua 5.2), Tomas Guisasola Gorham
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] more luaL_check* in lauxlib.h (for Lua 5.2), Miles Bader
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] more luaL_check* in lauxlib.h (for Lua 5.2), Peter Odding
  • Re: [ann] Lua 1.0-alpha For IntelliJ IDEA And Other JetBrains Products, Jon Akhtar
  • Re: [ann] Lua 1.0-alpha For IntelliJ IDEA And Other JetBrains Products, Jon Akhtar
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] more luaL_check* in lauxlib.h (for Lua 5.2), Mark Hamburg
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] more luaL_check* in lauxlib.h (for Lua 5.2), Miles Bader
  • upvals in Lua bytecode, Xingzhi Pan
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] more luaL_check* in lauxlib.h (for Lua 5.2), HyperHacker
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] more luaL_check* in lauxlib.h (for Lua 5.2), Alexander Gladysh
  • Re: upvals in Lua bytecode, Javier Guerra Giraldez
  • Re: upvals in Lua bytecode, François Perrad
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] more luaL_check* in lauxlib.h (for Lua 5.2), Miles Bader
  • Re: upvals in Lua bytecode, Xingzhi Pan
  • Re: upvals in Lua bytecode, Geoff Leyland
  • Re: upvals in Lua bytecode, Reuben Thomas
  • Re: upvals in Lua bytecode, Miles Bader
  • Re: upvals in Lua bytecode, Reuben Thomas
  • Re: upvals in Lua bytecode, Geoff Leyland
  • Re: upvals in Lua bytecode, Reuben Thomas
  • [LuaJIT] Does LuaJIT planned to support load/dump bytecode?, Xavier Wang
  • Re: upvals in Lua bytecode, Miles Bader
  • Re: upvals in Lua bytecode, Reuben Thomas
  • Re: [LuaJIT] Does LuaJIT planned to support load/dump bytecode?, steve donovan
  • Re: upvals in Lua bytecode, Miles Bader
  • Get table containing variable?, HyperHacker
  • Re: Get table containing variable?, Miles Bader
  • Porting Lua to Windows Mobile Professional 6.5.3, Marc Balmer
  • Re: Porting Lua to Windows Mobile Professional 6.5.3, Rebel Neurofog
  • Re: [LuaJIT] Does LuaJIT planned to support load/dump bytecode?, Xavier Wang
  • Re: Porting Lua to Windows Mobile Professional 6.5.3, Marc Balmer
  • Re: [LuaJIT] Does LuaJIT planned to support load/dump bytecode?, Rob Kendrick
  • Re: Porting Lua to Windows Mobile Professional 6.5.3, Reuben Thomas
  • Re: Porting Lua to Windows Mobile Professional 6.5.3, Vincent Torri
  • Re: upvals in Lua bytecode, Florian Weimer
  • Re: Porting Lua to Windows Mobile Professional 6.5.3, Rebel Neurofog
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] more luaL_check* in lauxlib.h (for Lua 5.2), Tony Finch
  • Re: upvals in Lua bytecode, Tony Finch
  • Re: upvals in Lua bytecode, Tony Finch
  • Re: [ann] Lua 1.0-alpha For IntelliJ IDEA And Other JetBrains Products, Pierre-Yves Gérardy
  • Re: upvals in Lua bytecode, Tony Finch
  • Re: [ann] Lua 1.0-alpha For IntelliJ IDEA And Other JetBrains Products, steve donovan
  • Re: upvals in Lua bytecode, Pierre Chapuis
  • Re: Porting Lua to Windows Mobile Professional 6.5.3, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: upvals in Lua bytecode, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: [LuaJIT] Does LuaJIT planned to support load/dump bytecode?, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: Porting Lua to Windows Mobile Professional 6.5.3, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • enumerating local vars in C, Jörg Walter
  • Re: Porting Lua to Windows Mobile Professional 6.5.3, Marc Balmer
  • Re: enumerating local vars in C, steve donovan
  • Re: [ann] Lua 1.0-alpha For IntelliJ IDEA And Other JetBrains Products, Pierre-Yves Gérardy
  • Re: [ann] Lua 1.0-alpha For IntelliJ IDEA And Other JetBrains Products, Pierre-Yves Gérardy
  • Re: [ann] Lua 1.0-alpha For IntelliJ IDEA And Other JetBrains Products, Jon Akhtar
  • Re: Porting Lua to Windows Mobile Professional 6.5.3, Marc Balmer
  • Re: Porting Lua to Windows Mobile Professional 6.5.3, Jon Akhtar
  • Re: Porting Lua to Windows Mobile Professional 6.5.3, Marc Balmer
  • Re: Porting Lua to Windows Mobile Professional 6.5.3, Reuben Thomas
  • Re: Porting Lua to Windows Mobile Professional 6.5.3, Thomas Harning Jr.
  • Re: Porting Lua to Windows Mobile Professional 6.5.3, Rob Kendrick
  • Re: Porting Lua to Windows Mobile Professional 6.5.3, Reuben Thomas
  • Re: Porting Lua to Windows Mobile Professional 6.5.3, Marc Balmer
  • MYCFLAGS in Lua 5.2, Reuben Thomas
  • Re: Porting Lua to Windows Mobile Professional 6.5.3, Jon Akhtar
  • Re: Porting Lua to Windows Mobile Professional 6.5.3, Reuben Thomas
  • Re: Porting Lua to Windows Mobile Professional 6.5.3, Marc Balmer
  • Re: Porting Lua to Windows Mobile Professional 6.5.3, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: Porting Lua to Windows Mobile Professional 6.5.3, Marc Balmer
  • Defining a library for mutable byte arrays, Florian Weimer
  • Re: Defining a library for mutable byte arrays, Reuben Thomas
  • Re: Porting Lua to Windows Mobile Professional 6.5.3, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: Porting Lua to Windows Mobile Professional 6.5.3, Marc Balmer
  • Re: Porting Lua to Windows Mobile Professional 6.5.3, Marc Balmer
  • Re: Defining a library for mutable byte arrays, Florian Weimer
  • Re: Porting Lua to Windows Mobile Professional 6.5.3, Patrick Rapin
  • Re: Porting Lua to Windows Mobile Professional 6.5.3, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: Doubt about ebnf parser using lpeg., Cleverton Hentz
  • Re: Porting Lua to Windows Mobile Professional 6.5.3, Marc Balmer
  • Re: Porting Lua to Windows Mobile Professional 6.5.3, Marc Balmer
  • Re: Porting Lua to Windows Mobile Professional 6.5.3, Marc Balmer
  • Re: Porting Lua to Windows Mobile Professional 6.5.3, Marc Balmer
  • Re: Porting Lua to Windows Mobile Professional 6.5.3, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: Porting Lua to Windows Mobile Professional 6.5.3, Marc Balmer
  • Re: Porting Lua to Windows Mobile Professional 6.5.3, Tony Finch
  • Re: Porting Lua to Windows Mobile Professional 6.5.3, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: Porting Lua to Windows Mobile Professional 6.5.3, liam mail
  • Re: Mike Pall's standalone FFI: a dream?, Florian Weimer
  • A low-level approach to mutable byte-arrays, Eduardo Ochs
  • Re: Mike Pall's standalone FFI: a dream?, Dimiter "malkia" Stanev
  • Re: Porting Lua to Windows Mobile Professional 6.5.3, Marc Balmer
  • Re: Porting Lua to Windows Mobile Professional 6.5.3, Marc Balmer
  • Re: Porting Lua to Windows Mobile Professional 6.5.3, liam mail
  • Re: Porting Lua to Windows Mobile Professional 6.5.3, Marc Balmer
  • Re: Defining a library for mutable byte arrays, HyperHacker
  • Re: upvals in Lua bytecode, HyperHacker
  • Re: upvals in Lua bytecode, Patrick Donnelly
  • Re: [LuaJIT FFI] tonumber() and cdata, Paul Bonser
  • Re: upvals in Lua bytecode, Xingzhi Pan
  • Re: [LuaJIT FFI] tonumber() and cdata, Duncan Cross
• June 03, 2011
  • Re: LuaJIT on Efika MX Smartbook (ARMv7), Dimiter "malkia" Stanev
  • Re: object addresses in Lua, Xingzhi Pan
  • [LuaJIT] compile LuaJIT ARM port for Symbian fault with linker error, Xavier Wang
  • IUP "basic" mode, Marc Balmer
  • Problems with debugging using LuaForWindows conflicting with require"strict", "J.Jørgen von Bargen"
  • Re: Problems with debugging using LuaForWindows conflicting with require"strict", steve donovan
  • Compatible coding: 'arg' in 5.1 vs 5.2, Dirk Laurie
  • Re: [LuaJIT] compile LuaJIT ARM port for Symbian fault with linker error, Mike Pall
  • Re: Mike Pall's standalone FFI: a dream?, Justin Cormack
  • Re: Compatible coding: 'arg' in 5.1 vs 5.2, steve donovan
  • RE: IUP "basic" mode, Antonio Scuri
  • Re: object addresses in Lua, Jörg Walter
  • Re: [LuaJIT] compile LuaJIT ARM port for Symbian fault with linker error, Xavier Wang
  • Re: [LuaJIT] Does LuaJIT planned to support load/dump bytecode?, Xavier Wang
  • Re: [LuaJIT] Does LuaJIT planned to support load/dump bytecode?, Rob Kendrick
  • Re: [LuaJIT] Does LuaJIT planned to support load/dump bytecode?, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: [LuaJIT] Does LuaJIT planned to support load/dump bytecode?, KHMan
  • [ANN] LuaExpat 1.2.0 released, Matthew Wild
  • Re: [LuaJIT] compile LuaJIT ARM port for Symbian fault with linker error, Xavier Wang
  • Re: [LuaJIT] compile LuaJIT ARM port for Symbian fault with linker error, Mike Pall
  • Re: [LuaJIT] compile LuaJIT ARM port for Symbian fault with linker error, Florian Weimer
  • Re: Mike Pall's standalone FFI: a dream?, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: Compatible coding: 'arg' in 5.1 vs 5.2, Leo Razoumov
  • Re: Compatible coding: 'arg' in 5.1 vs 5.2, GrayFace
  • Re: Compatible coding: 'arg' in 5.1 vs 5.2, Matthew Wild
  • Re: Compatible coding: 'arg' in 5.1 vs 5.2, Lorenzo Donati
• June 04, 2011
  • Re: [LuaJIT] compile LuaJIT ARM port for Symbian fault with linker error, Xavier Wang
  • Re: [LuaJIT] compile LuaJIT ARM port for Symbian fault with linker error, Xavier Wang
  • Re: object addresses in Lua, Robert G. Jakabosky
  • Re: Defining a library for mutable byte arrays, steve donovan
  • Re: Debug API and return values, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: Defining a library for mutable byte arrays, Axel Kittenberger
  • Re: Mike Pall's standalone FFI: a dream?, Axel Kittenberger
  • Re: Defining a library for mutable byte arrays, Henk Boom
  • [ANN] Lua Alchemy v0.3, Alexander Gladysh
• June 05, 2011
  • Re: Compatible coding: 'arg' in 5.1 vs 5.2, Javier Guerra Giraldez
  • Re: Defining a library for mutable byte arrays, Javier Guerra Giraldez
  • Re: [ANN] Lua Alchemy v0.3, Emmanuel Oga
  • Re: [ANN] Lua Alchemy v0.3, Alexander Gladysh
  • Re: [ANN] Lua Alchemy v0.3, Alexander Gladysh
  • Re: [ANN] Lua Alchemy v0.3, Emmanuel Oga
  • Re: [ANN] Lua Alchemy v0.3, Alexander Gladysh
  • Re: Defining a library for mutable byte arrays, Dirk Laurie
  • Lua minus null (-0), Sebastian
  • Re: Lua minus null (-0), Dirk Laurie
  • Re: Lua minus null (-0), Reuben Thomas
  • [ANN] tnetstrings.lua 1.0.0, Josh Simmons
  • Re: [ANN] tnetstrings.lua 1.0.0, Florian Weimer
  • Re: [ANN] tnetstrings.lua 1.0.0, Josh Simmons
  • Re: [ANN] tnetstrings.lua 1.0.0, Florian Weimer
  • Re: [ANN] tnetstrings.lua 1.0.0, Josh Simmons
  • Re: [ANN] tnetstrings.lua 1.0.0, Josh Simmons
  • Re: [ANN] tnetstrings.lua 1.0.0, Florian Weimer
  • Re: [ANN] tnetstrings.lua 1.0.0, Josh Simmons
  • Re: [ANN] tnetstrings.lua 1.0.0, Michal Kottman
  • Re: [ANN] tnetstrings.lua 1.0.0, Josh Simmons
  • Re: [ANN] tnetstrings.lua 1.0.0, Gaspard Bucher
  • Re: Lua minus null (-0), Henk Boom
  • Re: Lua minus null (-0), Dirk Laurie
  • Re: [ANN] tnetstrings.lua 1.0.0, Josh Simmons
  • Re: Lua minus null (-0), Martin Guy
• June 06, 2011
  • Re: Lua minus null (-0), HyperHacker
  • Re: Lua minus null (-0), GrayFace
  • Re: Lua minus null (-0), GrayFace
  • Re: Lua minus null (-0), Patrick Donnelly
  • Re: Mike Pall's standalone FFI: a dream?, Miles Bader
  • Re: Lua minus null (-0), Dirk Laurie
  • Re: Lua minus null (-0), David Kastrup
  • Re: Lua minus null (-0), Dirk Laurie
  • Re: Lua minus null (-0), Reuben Thomas
  • Re: Lua minus null (-0), Dirk Laurie
  • Re: [ANN] Lua Alchemy v0.3, Justin Cormack
  • [ANN] stdlib release 21 released, rrt
  • Re: [ANN] Lua Alchemy v0.3, Alexander Gladysh
  • Helping Project Kepler?, Reuben Thomas
  • Re: Lua minus null (-0), marbux
  • Re: Lua minus null (-0), Reuben Thomas
  • Re: Helping Project Kepler?, steve donovan
  • Re: Helping Project Kepler?, Alexander Gladysh
  • Re: Helping Project Kepler?, steve donovan
  • LuaJIT FFI file/directory iterator help needed, Attila
  • Is LuaRocks.org down?, Lee Hickey
  • Re: Is LuaRocks.org down?, steve donovan
  • Re: Helping Project Kepler?, Fabio Mascarenhas
  • Re: LuaJIT FFI file/directory iterator help needed, steve donovan
  • Re: Is LuaRocks.org down?, Lee Hickey
  • Re: Helping Project Kepler?, steve donovan
  • Re: LuaJIT FFI file/directory iterator help needed, Peter Cawley
  • Re: LuaJIT FFI file/directory iterator help needed, marbux
  • Re: Helping Project Kepler?, Alexander Gladysh
  • Re: Lua minus null (-0), Dirk Laurie
  • Re: LuaJIT FFI file/directory iterator help needed, Attila
  • Re: Helping Project Kepler?, steve donovan
  • Re: Helping Project Kepler?, Alexander Gladysh
  • Re: LuaJIT FFI file/directory iterator help needed, Attila
  • Re: Lua minus null (-0), Jorge Visca
  • Re: Defining a library for mutable byte arrays, Tony Finch
  • Re: MYCFLAGS in Lua 5.2, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: LuaJIT FFI file/directory iterator help needed, Dimiter "malkia" Stanev
  • Re: [LuaJIT FFI] tonumber() and cdata, Mike Pall
  • [ANN] Lua for Windows v5.1.4-43 Released, RJP Computing
  • Lua headlining on Tiobe again, Patrick Mc(avery
  • Re: Lua headlining on Tiobe again, KHMan
• June 07, 2011
  • Re: Lua headlining on Tiobe again, Alexander Gladysh
  • Re: Lua headlining on Tiobe again, KHMan
  • Re: LuaJIT FFI file/directory iterator help needed, steve donovan
  • Re: [ANN] tnetstrings.lua 1.0.0, Pierre Chapuis
  • Re: [ANN] tnetstrings.lua 1.0.0, Josh Simmons
  • Re: Lua headlining on Tiobe again, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: Lua headlining on Tiobe again, Patrick Mc(avery
  • Re: MYCFLAGS in Lua 5.2, Reuben Thomas
  • Re: MYCFLAGS in Lua 5.2, Alexander Gladysh
  • Re: Lua headlining on Tiobe again, steve donovan
  • [LuaJIT] Where can I ask help for LuaJIT ffi related problems?, Attila
  • avoiding copy - Luajit FFI, Fabio Kaminski
  • Re: avoiding copy - Luajit FFI, Patrick Donnelly
  • Re: LuaJIT FFI file/directory iterator help needed, Justin Cormack
  • Re: avoiding copy - Luajit FFI, Justin Cormack
  • Re: avoiding copy - Luajit FFI, Fabio Kaminski
  • Re: avoiding copy - Luajit FFI, Fabio Kaminski
  • Re: avoiding copy - Luajit FFI, Justin Cormack
  • Re: avoiding copy - Luajit FFI, Fabio Kaminski
  • Need Iup documentation, Bernd Eggink
  • Re: avoiding copy - Luajit FFI, Fabio Kaminski
  • Re: avoiding copy - Luajit FFI, Fabio Kaminski
  • Re: avoiding copy - Luajit FFI, Peter Cawley
  • Re: avoiding copy - Luajit FFI, Fabio Kaminski
  • Re: Need Iup documentation, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: avoiding copy - Luajit FFI, Duncan Cross
  • Re: avoiding copy - Luajit FFI, Mike Pall
  • Re: avoiding copy - Luajit FFI, Fabio Kaminski
  • Re: avoiding copy - Luajit FFI, Fabio Kaminski
  • RE: Need Iup documentation, Antonio Scuri
  • Re: Porting Lua to Windows Mobile Professional 6.5.3, Petr Štetiar
  • Re: Porting Lua to Windows Mobile Professional 6.5.3, Petr Štetiar
  • Re: Porting Lua to Windows Mobile Professional 6.5.3, Petr Štetiar
  • Re: Need Iup documentation, Bernd Eggink
  • Re: Need Iup documentation, Bernd Eggink
  • Re: help about pattern-matching, Igor Medeiros
  • Re: [LuaJIT] Where can I ask help for LuaJIT ffi related problems?, Peter Cawley
  • Re: Lua headlining on Tiobe again, Tim Mensch
• June 08, 2011
  • Re: help about pattern-matching, Vaughan McAlley
  • Re: help about pattern-matching, steve donovan
  • Re: help about pattern-matching, Shmuel Zeigerman
  • Re: help about pattern-matching, Dirk Laurie
  • Re: help about pattern-matching, liam mail
  • Re: help about pattern-matching, Dirk Laurie
  • Re: help about pattern-matching, Miles Bader
  • Re: help about pattern-matching, Alexander Gladysh
  • Re: help about pattern-matching, Dirk Laurie
  • Re: [LuaJIT] Where can I ask help for LuaJIT ffi related problems?, Attila
  • Re: [LuaJIT] Where can I ask help for LuaJIT ffi related problems?, Xavier Wang
  • os.remove promises more than it can deliver, Reuben Thomas
  • call for presentations at the Lua Workshop 2011, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: avoiding copy - Luajit FFI, Fabio Kaminski
  • Re: [LuaJIT] Where can I ask help for LuaJIT ffi related problems?, steve donovan
  • 32-bit CUPs with support for IEEE 754, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: 32-bit CUPs with support for IEEE 754, Alex Queiroz
  • Re: 32-bit CUPs with support for IEEE 754, David Given
  • Re: [LuaJIT] Where can I ask help for LuaJIT ffi related problems?, Fabio Kaminski
  • Re: 32-bit CUPs with support for IEEE 754, KHMan
  • Re: call for presentations at the Lua Workshop 2011, H. Diedrich
  • Re: 32-bit CUPs with support for IEEE 754, KHMan
  • Re: Lua minus null (-0), Everett L Williams II
  • Re: 32-bit CUPs with support for IEEE 754, Florian Weimer
  • Re: Lua minus null (-0), Patrick Donnelly
  • Re: Lua minus null (-0), Patrick Donnelly
  • Re: 32-bit CUPs with support for IEEE 754, Dimiter "malkia" Stanev
  • Re: Lua minus null (-0), David Given
  • Re: 32-bit CUPs with support for IEEE 754, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: call for presentations at the Lua Workshop 2011, Gaspard Bucher
  • Re: Lua minus null (-0), Dirk Laurie
  • Re: help about pattern-matching, Igor Medeiros
  • Re: [LuaJIT] Where can I ask help for LuaJIT ffi related problems?, Peter Cawley
• June 09, 2011
  • Re: help about pattern-matching, Tom N Harris
  • Re: [LuaJIT] Where can I ask help for LuaJIT ffi related problems?, CrazyButcher
  • Re: Lua minus null (-0), David Kastrup
  • [ANN] Winapi - a minimal but useful Windows API binding, steve donovan
  • Re: Lua minus null (-0), Dirk Laurie
  • Re: Lua minus null (-0), David Kastrup
  • Re: Lua minus null (-0), Dirk Laurie
  • Re: Lua minus null (-0), David Kastrup
  • Re: Lua minus null (-0), Peter Hickman
  • Re: Lua minus null (-0), David Kastrup
  • Coercion to string does not call metamethod (Was: Lua minus null (-0), Dirk Laurie
  • Re: Lua minus null (-0), David Kastrup
  • Re: [ANN] Winapi - a minimal but useful Windows API binding, Patrick Rapin
  • Re: [ANN] Winapi - a minimal but useful Windows API binding, steve donovan
  • Re: Lua minus null (-0), Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: Lua minus null (-0), Martin Guy
  • Re: [ANN] Winapi - a minimal but useful Windows API binding, Ignacio Burgueño
  • Re: [ANN] Winapi - a minimal but useful Windows API binding, steve donovan
  • Re: [ANN] Winapi - a minimal but useful Windows API binding, steve donovan
  • Re: [ANN] Winapi - a minimal but useful Windows API binding, Peter Cawley
  • Lua Missions (a.k.a. Lua Koans), Enrique Garcia Cota
  • Re: Lua minus null (-0), Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: Lua minus null (-0), Tony Finch
  • Re: Lua minus null (-0), David Kastrup
  • Re: Lua minus null (-0), Patrick Rapin
  • Re: call for presentations at the Lua Workshop 2011, Peter Cawley
  • Re: Lua minus null (-0), David Kastrup
  • strange warnings, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: Lua minus null (-0), Dirk Laurie
  • Too many local variables?, Andreas Falkenhahn
  • Re: strange warnings, liam mail
  • Re: strange warnings, Mike Pall
  • RE: strange warnings, Cuero Bugot
  • Re: [ANN] Winapi - a minimal but useful Windows API binding, Javier Guerra Giraldez
  • Re: [ANN] Winapi - a minimal but useful Windows API binding, Marc Balmer
  • Re: Too many local variables?, Rebel Neurofog
  • RE: strange warnings, Cuero Bugot
  • Re: [ANN] Winapi - a minimal but useful Windows API binding, Javier Guerra Giraldez
  • Re: [ANN] Winapi - a minimal but useful Windows API binding, Marc Balmer
  • Re: Too many local variables?, Dirk Laurie
  • Re: strange warnings, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: strange warnings, Doug Currie
  • Re: strange warnings, Mike Pall
  • Re: strange warnings, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: [ANN] Winapi - a minimal but useful Windows API binding, steve donovan
  • Re: [ANN] Winapi - a minimal but useful Windows API binding, Javier Guerra Giraldez
  • Re: strange warnings, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: [ANN] Winapi - a minimal but useful Windows API binding, David Given
  • Re: Too many local variables?, Fabio Kaminski
  • LuaThread, en dator
  • luajit-FFI suggestions, Scott Shumaker
  • Re: LuaThread, Patrick Donnelly
  • Re: 32-bit CUPs with support for IEEE 754, Florian Weimer
  • FFI tips, Scott Shumaker
  • Re: luajit-FFI suggestions, Mike Pall
  • Re: luajit-FFI suggestions, Tony Finch
  • Re: LuaThread, Doug Currie
  • Re: Coercion to string does not call metamethod (Was: Lua minus null (-0), HyperHacker
  • Re: Coercion to string does not call metamethod (Was: Lua minus null (-0), Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: LuaThread, en dator
  • Re: LuaThread, Sam Roberts
  • Re: Lua Missions (a.k.a. Lua Koans), Jim Whitehead II
  • Re: Lua Missions (a.k.a. Lua Koans), Enrique Garcia Cota
• June 10, 2011
  • Re: [ANN] Winapi - a minimal but useful Windows API binding, Tom N Harris
  • caching pointers to Lua strings?, Josh Haberman
  • Re: FFI tips, Fabio Kaminski
  • Re: caching pointers to Lua strings?, Florian Weimer
  • Lua Missions (a.k.a. Lua Koans), Lucas Zawacki
  • Registration for the Lua Workshop 2011 in Switzerland, Marc Balmer
  • Re: Registration for the Lua Workshop 2011 in Switzerland, Erik Hougaard
  • Re: Registration for the Lua Workshop 2011 in Switzerland, Alexander Gladysh
  • Re: Registration for the Lua Workshop 2011 in Switzerland, Marc Balmer
  • Re: Registration for the Lua Workshop 2011 in Switzerland, Marc Balmer
  • Re: Lua Missions (a.k.a. Lua Koans), Enrique Garcia Cota
  • Re: [ANN] Winapi - a minimal but useful Windows API binding, steve donovan
  • Re: caching pointers to Lua strings?, Reuben Thomas
  • Re: caching pointers to Lua strings?, steve donovan
  • Re: FFI tips, steve donovan
  • Re: caching pointers to Lua strings?, Peter Cawley
  • Re: [ANN] Winapi - a minimal but useful Windows API binding, Jerome Vuarand
  • Re: LuaThread, Mateusz Czaplinski
  • Re: [ANN] Winapi - a minimal but useful Windows API binding, steve donovan
  • Re: caching pointers to Lua strings?, Mike Pall
  • Re: Registration for the Lua Workshop 2011 in Switzerland, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: LuaThread, en dator
  • Re: LuaThread, liam mail
  • Re: LuaThread, Doug Currie
  • Re: LuaThread, steve donovan
  • Re: [ANN] Winapi - a minimal but useful Windows API binding, David Given
  • debug.traceback() without message but with level doesn't seem to wok, Richter, Jörg
  • playwithlua.com, Ross Andrews
  • Re: playwithlua.com, Jerome Vuarand
  • Re: playwithlua.com, Ross Andrews
  • Re: playwithlua.com, Jerome Vuarand
  • Re: playwithlua.com, Ross Andrews
  • Re: caching pointers to Lua strings?, Josh Haberman
  • Re: caching pointers to Lua strings?, Josh Haberman
  • Problems compiling LuaJIT on Solaris., Will Metcalf
  • Re: caching pointers to Lua strings?, Florian Weimer
• June 11, 2011
  • getmetatable(cdata) return string 'ffi', why not a table, zhiguo zhao
  • Minimum typing in a Table, PROXiCiDE
  • Re: Minimum typing in a Table, Julien Desgats
  • Re: Minimum typing in a Table, Julien Desgats
  • Re: Minimum typing in a Table, Dirk Laurie
  • Re: getmetatable(cdata) return string 'ffi', why not a table, Justin Cormack
  • Re: LuaThread, Justin Cormack
  • Re: getmetatable(cdata) return string 'ffi', why not a table, Matthew Wild
  • FFI metamethods on C struct pointer, Javier Guerra Giraldez
  • coroutine.yield from debug hook in LuaJIT 2, Greg
  • Re: getmetatable(cdata) return string 'ffi', why not a table, Benoit Germain
  • Re: coroutine.yield from debug hook in LuaJIT 2, Mike Pall
  • Re: FFI metamethods on C struct pointer, Mike Pall
  • Re: Problems compiling LuaJIT on Solaris., Mike Pall
  • Re: FFI metamethods on C struct pointer, Javier Guerra Giraldez
  • Re: FFI metamethods on C struct pointer, Duncan Cross
  • Re: FFI metamethods on C struct pointer, Javier Guerra Giraldez
  • Re: FFI metamethods on C struct pointer, Mike Pall
  • Re: FFI metamethods on C struct pointer, Mike Pall
  • Re: Minimum typing in a Table, PROXiCiDE
  • Re: FFI metamethods on C struct pointer, Duncan Cross
  • Re: FFI metamethods on C struct pointer, Javier Guerra Giraldez
  • Nesting, PROXiCiDE
  • luadoc: best way to handle table parameters?, David Hollander
• June 12, 2011
  • Re: [ANN] Winapi - a minimal but useful Windows API binding, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: [ANN] Winapi - a minimal but useful Windows API binding, steve donovan
  • Re: luadoc: best way to handle table parameters?, steve donovan
  • Re: [ANN] Winapi - a minimal but useful Windows API binding, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: [ANN] Winapi - a minimal but useful Windows API binding, steve donovan
  • Re: luadoc: best way to handle table parameters?, Dirk Laurie
  • Re: [ANN] Winapi - a minimal but useful Windows API binding, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: [ANN] Winapi - a minimal but useful Windows API binding, KHMan
  • Re: [ANN] Winapi - a minimal but useful Windows API binding, GrayFace
  • Re: [ANN] Winapi - a minimal but useful Windows API binding, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: [ANN] Winapi - a minimal but useful Windows API binding, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: [ANN] Winapi - a minimal but useful Windows API binding, KHMan
  • Re: luadoc: best way to handle table parameters?, steve donovan
  • Re: [ANN] Winapi - a minimal but useful Windows API binding, steve donovan
  • Re: Coercion to string does not call metamethod (Was: Lua minus null (-0), HyperHacker
  • Re: Coercion to string does not call metamethod (Was: Lua minus null (-0), Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: Coercion to string does not call metamethod (Was: Lua minus null (-0), HyperHacker
  • Re: Coercion to string does not call metamethod, Florian Weimer
  • Re: Coercion to string does not call metamethod (Was: Lua minus null (-0), Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: luadoc: best way to handle table parameters?, Dirk Laurie
  • Re: Coercion to string does not call metamethod (Was: Lua minus null (-0), HyperHacker
• June 13, 2011
  • Mac OS X Compile problem, Dimiter "malkia" Stanev
  • Re: Mac OS X Compile problem, Alexander Gladysh
  • Re: Mac OS X Compile problem, Justin Cormack
  • Great news: Xapian now supports Lua!, sabrina
  • [ANN] Winapi 2nd beta, steve donovan
  • Re: [ANN] Winapi 2nd beta, Dušan Majkić
  • Steve Donovan's ldoc: recognized function declaration formats and possible bug, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: [ANN] Winapi 2nd beta, steve donovan
  • Re: Steve Donovan's ldoc: recognized function declaration formats and possible bug, Reuben Thomas
  • Re: Steve Donovan's ldoc: recognized function declaration formats and possible bug, steve donovan
  • Sidereal vs. Redis 2.2, Alexander Gladysh
  • Re: [ANN] Winapi 2nd beta, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: [ANN] Winapi 2nd beta, Lorenzo Donati
  • is this behavior correct?, Xavier Wang
  • Re: is this behavior correct?, Peter Cawley
  • Re: Steve Donovan's ldoc: recognized function declaration formats and possible bug, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: Great news: Xapian now supports Lua!, GrayFace
  • Re: Steve Donovan's ldoc: recognized function declaration formats and possible bug, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: Steve Donovan's ldoc: recognized function declaration formats and possible bug, Reuben Thomas
  • Re: is this behavior correct?, steve donovan
  • Re: Great news: Xapian now supports Lua!, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: Steve Donovan's ldoc: recognized function declaration formats and possible bug, steve donovan
  • Re: Steve Donovan's ldoc: recognized function declaration formats and possible bug, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: Steve Donovan's ldoc: recognized function declaration formats and possible bug, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: [ANN] Winapi 2nd beta, Ryan Pusztai
  • Re: [ANN] Winapi 2nd beta, steve donovan
  • Re: Steve Donovan's ldoc: recognized function declaration formats and possible bug, Javier Guerra Giraldez
  • Re: Steve Donovan's ldoc: recognized function declaration formats and possible bug, Jim Whitehead II
  • Re: Mac OS X Compile problem, Dimiter "malkia" Stanev
  • Re: debug.traceback() without message but with level doesn't seem to wok, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • [ANN] Linux syscall library (ffi), Justin Cormack
  • Re: Steve Donovan's ldoc: recognized function declaration formats and possible bug, Javier Guerra Giraldez
  • Difficulties with LuaRocks, steve donovan
  • Re: Steve Donovan's ldoc: recognized function declaration formats and possible bug, Jim Whitehead II
  • Re: Difficulties with LuaRocks, Jim Whitehead II
  • Re: Difficulties with LuaRocks, Rob Kendrick
  • Re: Difficulties with LuaRocks, steve donovan
  • Re: Difficulties with LuaRocks, Javier Guerra Giraldez
  • Re: Difficulties with LuaRocks, Hisham
  • Re: coroutine.yield from debug hook in LuaJIT 2, Greg
  • [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: is this behavior correct?, john gladkih 599133195
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Peter Cawley
  • Lua stack problem., Gabriel Lassonde
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Peter Cawley
  • Re: is this behavior correct?, Javier Guerra Giraldez
  • Re: coroutine.yield from debug hook in LuaJIT 2, Mike Pall
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Xavier Wang
  • Re: Lua stack problem., Ross Andrews
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: Lua stack problem., Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Petite Abeille
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Peter Cawley
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: coroutine.yield from debug hook in LuaJIT 2, Greg
  • Re: is this behavior correct?, Dirk Laurie
  • Re: coroutine.yield from debug hook in LuaJIT 2, Mike Pall
  • Lua Support for Netbeans? Any Java Devs Want To Try?, Dac Chartrand
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Patrick Donnelly
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Petite Abeille
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Dirk Laurie
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: Lua stack problem., Gabriel Lassonde
  • Re: coroutine.yield from debug hook in LuaJIT 2, Greg
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Alexandre Erwin Ittner
  • Re: Lua stack problem., Marc Balmer
  • Re: Lua stack problem., Marc Balmer
  • Re: Lua stack problem., Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: call for presentations at the Lua Workshop 2011, Alexander Gladysh
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Patrick Donnelly
  • Re: Problems compiling LuaJIT on Solaris., Will Metcalf
  • Re: call for presentations at the Lua Workshop 2011, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: Problems compiling LuaJIT on Solaris., Mike Pall
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Tony Finch
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Using a function on multiple stacks, Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Modifying field of local table via c-Api, Jörg Walter
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Dirk Laurie
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: Problems compiling LuaJIT on Solaris., Will Metcalf
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, HyperHacker
  • Re: Using a function on multiple stacks, Patrick Donnelly
  • Re: luajit-FFI suggestions, Scott Shumaker
  • Re: Lua Support for Netbeans? Any Java Devs Want To Try?, Ignacio Burgueño
• June 14, 2011
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Tony Finch
  • Re: Problems compiling LuaJIT on Solaris., Mike Pall
  • Re: luajit-FFI suggestions, Mike Pall
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Roger Ivie
  • Re: Using a function on multiple stacks, Sean Conner
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Patrick Donnelly
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, dcharno
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Xavier Wang
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, David Manura
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: Lua Support for Netbeans? Any Java Devs Want To Try?, Cameron Seebach
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Xavier Wang
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Xavier Wang
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, David Manura
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Xavier Wang
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, KHMan
  • Re: Lua Support for Netbeans? Any Java Devs Want To Try?, steve donovan
  • RE: debug.traceback() without message but with level doesn't seem to wok, Richter, Jörg
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, steve donovan
  • Re: [ANN] Winapi - a minimal but useful Windows API binding, Jerome Vuarand
  • loadfile callback?, Han Zhao
  • Re: loadfile callback?, Tony Finch
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Tony Finch
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Tony Finch
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Dirk Laurie
  • Re: [ANN] Winapi - a minimal but useful Windows API binding, steve donovan
  • Re: loadfile callback?, Duncan Cross
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Tony Finch
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, David Given
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, steve donovan
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, steve donovan
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Peter Cawley
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Xavier Wang
  • Re: Coercion to string does not call metamethod, David Kastrup
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, David Kastrup
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, David Kastrup
  • Re: debug.traceback() without message but with level doesn't seem to wok, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, steve donovan
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Patrick Rapin
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Alistair Lynn
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Alistair Lynn
  • Re: [ANN] Winapi - a minimal but useful Windows API binding, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Patrick Rapin
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Lavergne Thomas
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Tomas Guisasola Gorham
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Enrico Colombini
  • Re: Modifying field of local table via c-Api, Robert G. Jakabosky
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, David Given
  • Re: is this behavior correct?, Philippe Lhoste
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Patrick Rapin
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Benoit Germain
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Jerome Vuarand
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, David Kastrup
  • Re: [ANN] Winapi - a minimal but useful Windows API binding, Jerome Vuarand
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Dirk Laurie
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, David Kastrup
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Jerome Vuarand
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, David Kastrup
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Dirk Laurie
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: Problems compiling LuaJIT on Solaris., Will Metcalf
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Mike Pall
  • day-of-week algorithm, Dave Collins
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Benoit Germain
  • Re: day-of-week algorithm, Roger Burton West
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Patrick Rapin
  • RE: day-of-week algorithm, Dave Collins
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: Problems compiling LuaJIT on Solaris., Mike Pall
  • Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) not on mainframes ?, ingelger
  • Re: day-of-week algorithm, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Jim Whitehead II
  • Re: day-of-week algorithm, Tony Finch
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Dirk Laurie
  • Re: Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) not on mainframes ?, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Completion with readline: release 2, Reuben Thomas
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Tomas Guisasola Gorham
  • Re: Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) not on mainframes ?, Adrian Perez
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Florian Weimer
  • [ANN] Lua for Windows v5.1.4-45 Released, RJP Computing
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: day-of-week algorithm, marbux
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Florian Weimer
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Dirk Laurie
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Florian Weimer
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Dirk Laurie
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Florian Weimer
  • Lua with xcode 4 and c++, Dirk
  • Re: luajit-FFI suggestions, Scott Shumaker
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, David Kastrup
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, H. Diedrich
  • Re: Lua with xcode 4 and c++, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, David Kastrup
  • Re: Lua with xcode 4 and c++ (Dirk), Justin Drury
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Florian Weimer
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Patrick Rapin
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, David Kastrup
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Florian Weimer
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, H. Diedrich
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Pierre-Yves Gérardy
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Pierre-Yves Gérardy
  • Re: luajit-FFI suggestions, Mike Pall
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, David Kastrup
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, David Given
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Gé Weijers
• June 15, 2011
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, David Manura
  • Re: lua-l Digest, Vol 11, Issue 70, Dac Chartrand
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: Lua with xcode 4 and c++, marbux
  • LPeg - stack overflow (too many runtime captures) with match time capture, leaf corcoran
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, phlnc8
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Xavier Wang
  • Re: Lua with xcode 4 and c++, Eric Wing
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Dirk Laurie
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Miles Bader
  • Strange behavior with Lua 5.2.0 beta-rc1, François Perrad
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Miles Bader
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, steve donovan
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Joseph Manning
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Marc Balmer
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Patrick Rapin
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Joseph Manning
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Paul Hudson
  • Re: loadfile callback?, Han Zhao
  • Re: [ANN] Winapi - a minimal but useful Windows API binding, steve donovan
  • Re: [ANN] Winapi 2nd beta, steve donovan
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, David Kastrup
  • The terms "sequence", "list", etc in Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1), Dirk Laurie
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Dirk Laurie
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Xavier Wang
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Miles Bader
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, David Given
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Jerome Vuarand
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Miles Bader
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Scott Morgan
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Enrico Colombini
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Jerome Vuarand
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) GOTO, Michael Rose
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, David Kastrup
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) GOTO, steve donovan
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, David Kastrup
  • Re: Strange behavior with Lua 5.2.0 beta-rc1, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Frank Meier-Dörnberg
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) GOTO, Michael Rose
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Michael Rose
  • pack/unpack, Fredrik Widlund
  • Re: pack/unpack, Jim Whitehead II
  • Re: pack/unpack, Patrick Donnelly
  • Re: pack/unpack, Alexandre Rion
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: [ANN] Winapi - a minimal but useful Windows API binding, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: [ANN] Winapi - a minimal but useful Windows API binding, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • SV: pack/unpack, Fredrik Widlund
  • Re: pack/unpack, Benoit Germain
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) GOTO, Pierre-Yves Gérardy
  • Re: pack/unpack, steve donovan
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) GOTO, Pierre-Yves Gérardy
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, David Kastrup
  • Re: pack/unpack, Javier Guerra Giraldez
  • Re: SV: pack/unpack, Dirk Laurie
  • Re: pack/unpack, Renato Maia
  • Re: pack/unpack, Pierre-Yves Gérardy
  • Re: SV: pack/unpack, David Kastrup
  • SV: SV: pack/unpack, Fredrik Widlund
  • Re: pack/unpack, Duncan Cross
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) GOTO, Michael Rose
  • Re: SV: pack/unpack, HyperHacker
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) GOTO, Michael Rose
  • SV: SV: pack/unpack, Fredrik Widlund
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Frank Meier-Dörnberg
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) GOTO, Matthew Wild
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Eduardo Ochs
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Frank Meier-Dörnberg
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, David Given
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Javier Guerra Giraldez
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Jose Luis Hidalgo
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Hans Hagen
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, phlnc8
  • Re: The terms "sequence", "list", etc in Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1), Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) GOTO, Pierre-Yves Gérardy
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Drake Wilson
  • Re: LPeg - stack overflow (too many runtime captures) with match time capture, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Mike Pall
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Drake Wilson
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Drake Wilson
  • Re: LPeg - stack overflow (too many runtime captures) with match time capture, leaf corcoran
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Jose Luis Hidalgo
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, HyperHacker
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Alexandre Rion
  • Re: Coercion to string does not call metamethod, HyperHacker
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Peter Cawley
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Jose Luis Hidalgo
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Tony Finch
• June 16, 2011
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, David Manura
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) GOTO, David Manura
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) GOTO, David Manura
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, HyperHacker
  • Re: The terms "sequence", "list", etc in Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1), Xavier Wang
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Xavier Wang
  • Re: The terms "sequence", "list", etc in Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1), David Manura
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, David Manura
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Andre Leiradella
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Miles Bader
  • Re: Wording in sequence definition [Was: The terms "sequence", "list", etc in Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1)], Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: [ANN] Lua for Windows v5.1.4-45 Released, Cameron Seebach
  • Re: The terms "sequence", "list", etc in Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1), David Kastrup
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, David Kolf
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, David Kolf
  • Re: Wording in sequence definition [Was: The terms "sequence", "list", etc in Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1)], Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: [ANN] Lua for Windows v5.1.4-45 Released, steve donovan
  • Re: SV: pack/unpack, Mateusz Czaplinski
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) GOTO, Michael Rose
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) GOTO, Michael Rose
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Mateusz Czaplinski
  • Re: [ANN] Lua for Windows v5.1.4-45 Released, Michal Kottman
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) GOTO, Pierre-Yves Gérardy
  • SV: SV: pack/unpack, Fredrik Widlund
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) GOTO, Pierre-Yves Gérardy
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Tony Finch
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) GOTO, Tony Finch
  • Ubuntu, C and LUA, MikkoMMM
  • Re: Ubuntu, C and LUA, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: Ubuntu, C and LUA, Justin Cormack
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Matthew Frazier
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Patrick Donnelly
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, joao lobato
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: LPeg - stack overflow (too many runtime captures) with match time capture, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Patrick Donnelly
  • Re: [ANN] Lua for Windows v5.1.4-45 Released, Cameron Seebach
  • Re: Wording in sequence definition [Was: The terms "sequence", "list", etc in Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1)], HyperHacker
  • Re: Wording in sequence definition [Was: The terms "sequence", "list", etc in Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1)], steve donovan
  • Re: Wording in sequence definition [Was: The terms "sequence", "list", etc in Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1)], Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: LPeg - stack overflow (too many runtime captures) with match time capture, leaf corcoran
  • Re: Wording in sequence definition [Was: The terms "sequence", "list", etc in Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1)], HyperHacker
  • Re: Wording in sequence definition [Was: The terms "sequence", "list", etc in Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1)], Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) goto syntax, Edgar Toernig
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) goto syntax, David Kastrup
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) goto syntax, HyperHacker
  • Re: Wording in sequence definition [Was: The terms "sequence", "list", etc in Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1)], HyperHacker
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) goto syntax, Edgar Toernig
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) goto syntax, Edgar Toernig
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) goto syntax, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: Wording in sequence definition [Was: The terms "sequence", "list", etc in Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1)], Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) goto syntax, David Kastrup
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Patrick Donnelly
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) GOTO, Michael Rose
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) goto syntax, HyperHacker
  • Variable in variable's name?, Kev Lugli
  • Re: Variable in variable's name?, Duncan Cross
  • Lacking type check functions in C API, HyperHacker
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) goto syntax, Alexandre Erwin Ittner
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) goto syntax, HyperHacker
  • Re: Ubuntu, C and LUA, MikkoMMM
  • Re: Lacking type check functions in C API, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: [ANN] Lua for Windows v5.1.4-45 Released, Javier Guerra Giraldez
  • Re: [ANN] Lua for Windows v5.1.4-45 Released, Ryan Pusztai
  • Re: [ANN] Lua for Windows v5.1.4-45 Released, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: Lacking type check functions in C API, HyperHacker
• June 17, 2011
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Tomas Guisasola Gorham
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Petri Häkkinen
  • Re: Lacking type check functions in C API, steve donovan
  • SV: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Fredrik Widlund
  • Re: Variable in variable's name?, Philippe Lhoste
  • luasocket, udp, send/receive different max datagram size?, Valerio Schiavoni
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) goto syntax, Fabio Kaminski
  • luasocket release history pushed to github, and zero-length udp send bug fixed, Sam Roberts
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) goto syntax, Charles Nicholson
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) goto syntax, HyperHacker
• June 18, 2011
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) goto syntax, Andrew Starks
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) goto syntax, Josh Simmons
  • How to make sure some operations in ANY situation? (aka: with statement in Python), Xavier Wang
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) goto syntax, David Manura
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Dmitriy Kryuk
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) goto syntax, Miles Bader
  • Lua file type plug-in for Vim (redux), Peter Odding
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) goto syntax, Mike Pall
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) goto syntax, steve donovan
  • SV: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) goto syntax, Fredrik Widlund
  • Re: SV: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) goto syntax, Miles Bader
  • Re: luasocket release history pushed to github, and zero-length udp send bug fixed, Alexander Gladysh
  • direct access to allocator's void *ud, Rebel Neurofog
  • Re: direct access to allocator's void *ud, liam mail
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) goto syntax, Petite Abeille
  • Re: direct access to allocator's void *ud, Rebel Neurofog
  • Re: direct access to allocator's void *ud, liam mail
  • Re: luasocket release history pushed to github, and zero-length udp send bug fixed, Sam Roberts
• June 19, 2011
  • Re: direct access to allocator's void *ud, Robert G. Jakabosky
  • Re: luasocket, udp, send/receive different max datagram size?, Sean Conner
  • Lua 5.2 __len metamethod, Krunal Rao
  • Re: Lua 5.2 __len metamethod, François Perrad
  • Re: is this behavior correct?, Ben Kelly
  • [ANN] LDoc - A documentation tool for Lua, steve donovan
  • IUP, menu layout tables: any suggestions for readability and improvement?, Cameron Seebach
• June 20, 2011
  • Coroutine bug?, Ian Godin
  • Minimizing repeatable statements with out LuaMacro, PROXiCiDE
  • updated bit32 library for Lua 5.1.4, Sean Bolton
  • Re: Coroutine bug?, Wim Couwenberg
  • Re: Coroutine bug?, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: Minimizing repeatable statements with out LuaMacro, Ico
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Vaughan McAlley
  • Re: Minimizing repeatable statements with out LuaMacro, PROXiCiDE
  • Re: is this behavior correct?, Dirk Laurie
  • Re: Coroutine bug?, Lorenzo Donati
  • Emulating advanced regex features using Lua patterns and pure Lua code, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: is this behavior correct?, Philippe Lhoste
  • Re: Emulating advanced regex features using Lua patterns and pure Lua code, steve donovan
  • Re: is this behavior correct?, steve donovan
  • Re: Minimizing repeatable statements with out LuaMacro, Philippe Lhoste
  • Re: Minimizing repeatable statements with out LuaMacro, Philippe Lhoste
  • Re: Emulating advanced regex features using Lua patterns and pure Lua code, Wim Couwenberg
  • Re: Emulating advanced regex features using Lua patterns and pure Lua code, David Kastrup
  • Re: is this behavior correct?, David Kastrup
  • Re: IUP, menu layout tables: any suggestions for readability and improvement?, steve donovan
  • Re: Emulating advanced regex features using Lua patterns and pure Lua code, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: Emulating advanced regex features using Lua patterns and pure Lua code, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: is this behavior correct?, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: is this behavior correct?, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: Emulating advanced regex features using Lua patterns and pure Lua code, Duncan Cross
  • Re: Emulating advanced regex features using Lua patterns and pure Lua code, Matthew Wild
  • Re: is this behavior correct?, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: is this behavior correct?, Philippe Lhoste
  • Re: is this behavior correct?, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: Minimizing repeatable statements with out LuaMacro, PROXiCiDE
  • Re: How to make sure some operations in ANY situation? (aka: with statement in Python), Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: How to make sure some operations in ANY situation? (aka: with statement in Python), Drake Wilson
  • Re: How to make sure some operations in ANY situation? (aka: with statement in Python), Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: Minimizing repeatable statements with out LuaMacro, James Graves
  • Re: How to make sure some operations in ANY situation? (aka: with statement in Python), Xavier Wang
  • Re: How to make sure some operations in ANY situation? (aka: with statement in Python), steve donovan
  • Re: How to make sure some operations in ANY situation? (aka: with statement in Python), Xavier Wang
  • Re: How to make sure some operations in ANY situation? (aka: with statement in Python), Jerome Vuarand
  • Re: How to make sure some operations in ANY situation? (aka: with statement in Python), Mark Hamburg
  • Re: How to make sure some operations in ANY situation? (aka: with statement in Python), Peter Cawley
  • Re: Minimizing repeatable statements with out LuaMacro, Ico
  • label syntax (Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available), David Kolf
  • Re: Minimizing repeatable statements with out LuaMacro, PROXiCiDE
  • [luajit2] Bug in luajit compiler exposed by vstruct test suite?, Ben Kelly
  • Re: [luajit2] Bug in luajit compiler exposed by vstruct test suite?, Mike Pall
• June 21, 2011
  • Re: Coroutine bug?, Ian Godin
  • LuaJIT ffi.arch and the iOS, Dimiter "malkia" Stanev
  • Lua to LPEG?, Dirk Laurie
  • Re: Lua to LPEG?, steve donovan
  • Re: Lua to LPEG?, David Given
  • Re: Lua to LPEG?, Dirk Laurie
  • Re: Lua to LPEG?, steve donovan
  • Re: Lua to LPEG?, Peter Cawley
  • Re: LuaJIT ffi.arch and the iOS, Mike Pall
  • Re: LuaJIT ffi.arch and the iOS, René Rebe
  • Re: Lua to LPEG?, Dirk Laurie
  • Re: Lua to LPEG?, Daurnimator
  • Re: Lua to LPEG?, Xavier Wang
  • Re: Lua to LPEG?, Duncan Cross
  • Re: Lua to LPEG?, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: Lua to LPEG?, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: Lua to LPEG?, steve donovan
  • Simple question about traversing a table, Christophe Jorssen
  • Re: Simple question about traversing a table, David Kolf
  • Re: Simple question about traversing a table, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: Simple question about traversing a table, James Graves
  • Free hardware, Andrew Armstrong
  • Re: Free hardware, Jeremy Darling
  • Re: Simple question about traversing a table, Christophe Jorssen
  • Re: LuaJIT ffi.arch and the iOS, Dimiter "malkia" Stanev
  • Xavante: getting post data, Ross Andrews
  • Re: Xavante: getting post data, Ignacio Burgueño
  • Re: Xavante: getting post data, Ross Andrews
  • Re: Xavante: getting post data, Ignacio Burgueño
  • [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc2) now available, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: Xavante: getting post data, Ross Andrews
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc2) now available, Peter Cawley
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc2) now available, liam mail
  • Request consideration for a new function : luaL_getfield, liam mail
• June 22, 2011
  • Re: Request consideration for a new function : luaL_getfield, liam mail
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc2) now available, dcharno
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc2) now available, Josh Simmons
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc2) now available, dcharno
  • Re: Free hardware, Daurnimator
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc2) now available, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc2) now available, David Manura
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc2) now available, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc2) now available, dcharno
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc2) now available, David Manura
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc2) now available, Miles Bader
  • Re: Request consideration for a new function : luaL_getfield, Benoit Germain
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc2) now available, dcharno
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc2) now available, David Kastrup
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc2) now available, steve donovan
  • How to write the __gc metamethod of referenced userdata?, Xavier Wang
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc2) now available, Jerome Vuarand
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc2) now available, steve donovan
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc2) now available, Alexandre Rion
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc2) now available, David Kastrup
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc2) now available, Patrick Rapin
  • Re: How to write the __gc metamethod of referenced userdata?, Jerome Vuarand
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc2) now available, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: How to write the __gc metamethod of referenced userdata?, Duncan Cross
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc2) now available, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc2) now available, Mike Pall
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc2) now available, steve donovan
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc2) now available, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc2) now available, Gé Weijers
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc2) now available, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc2) now available, Mike Pall
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc2) now available, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc2) now available, Peter Cawley
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc2) now available, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc2) now available, James Graves
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc2) now available, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc2) now available, Ignacio Burgueño
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc2) now available, dcharno
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc2) now available, David Kastrup
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc2) now available, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc2) now available, Alexandre Erwin Ittner
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc2) now available, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc2) now available, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc2) now available, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc2) now available, Fabio Mascarenhas
  • Extend the arithmetic expressions parser from lpeg example, Christophe Jorssen
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc2) now available, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc2) now available, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc2) locale, Edgar Toernig
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc2) locale, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc2) locale, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc2) locale, Edgar Toernig
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc2) now available - luaL_typerror(), phlnc8
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc2) locale, Edgar Toernig
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc2) locale, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • LuaJIT without the JIT?, HyperHacker
  • Re: LuaJIT without the JIT?, Fabio Kaminski
• June 23, 2011
  • Re: How to write the __gc metamethod of referenced userdata?, Xavier Wang
  • Yet again about constant overflow, Rebel Neurofog
  • Re: Yet again about constant overflow, Miles Bader
  • Re: LuaJIT without the JIT?, Dimiter "malkia" Stanev
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc2) now available, Gé Weijers
  • Re: LuaJIT without the JIT?, Fabio Kaminski
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc2) now available, David Manura
  • Re: LuaJIT without the JIT?, Josh Haberman
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc2) now available, Tom N Harris
  • Re: LuaJIT without the JIT?, HyperHacker
  • Lua reference manual sources availability and license., Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: LuaJIT without the JIT?, Dimiter "malkia" Stanev
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc2) now available - luaL_typerror(), liam mail
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc2) now available, Dirk Laurie
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc2) now available - luaL_typerror(), Dirk Laurie
  • SV: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc2) now available, Fredrik Widlund
  • Re: Yet again about constant overflow, Jerome Vuarand
  • Re: LuaJIT without the JIT?, Florian Weimer
  • Re: LuaJIT without the JIT?, Francesco Abbate
  • Re: LuaJIT without the JIT?, steve donovan
  • Re: SV: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc2) now available, Philippe Lhoste
  • Re: SV: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc2) now available, Alex Queiroz
  • Re: SV: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc2) now available, Xavier Wang
  • Re: LuaJIT without the JIT?, Alex Queiroz
  • Re: Lua reference manual sources availability and license., marbux
  • [ANN] lua-pb Lua Protocol Buffers, Robert G. Jakabosky
  • Re: SV: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc2) now available, David Given
  • Re: Lua reference manual sources availability and license., marbux
  • Re: LuaJIT without the JIT?, steve donovan
  • Re: SV: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc2) now available, Daurnimator
  • Lua Workshop 2011, start and end times, Gaspard Bucher
  • Re: SV: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc2) now available, Alex Queiroz
  • Re: SV: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc2) now available, David Given
  • Re: SV: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc2) now available, Alex Queiroz
  • Re: SV: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc2) now available, David Given
  • Re: LuaJIT without the JIT?, Javier Guerra Giraldez
  • Re: SV: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc2) now available, Alex Queiroz
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc2) now available - luaL_typerror(), phlnc8
  • Re: LuaJIT without the JIT?, Alex Queiroz
  • Re: SV: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc2) now available, David Given
  • Re: LuaJIT without the JIT?, Javier Guerra Giraldez
  • Re: LuaJIT without the JIT?, Lorenzo Donati
  • SAS to LUA conversion, Arthur Tretyak
  • Re: SAS to LUA conversion, Rob Kendrick
  • Re: SAS to LUA conversion, Javier Guerra Giraldez
  • Re: SAS to LUA conversion, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: SAS to LUA conversion, Pierre-Yves Gérardy
  • [ANN] LuaJIT-2.0.0-beta8, Mike Pall
  • Re: LuaJIT without the JIT?, Henning Diedrich
  • Re: [ANN] LuaJIT-2.0.0-beta8, Michael Gogins
  • Re: [ANN] LuaJIT-2.0.0-beta8, Dimiter "malkia" Stanev
  • Re: [ANN] LuaJIT-2.0.0-beta8, Javier Guerra Giraldez
  • Re: [ANN] LuaJIT-2.0.0-beta8, Dimiter "malkia" Stanev
  • Re: [ANN] LuaJIT-2.0.0-beta8, Fabio Kaminski
  • Re: [ANN] LuaJIT-2.0.0-beta8, Mike Pall
  • Re: [ANN] LuaJIT-2.0.0-beta8, Josh Haberman
  • Re: LuaJIT without the JIT?, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: [ANN] LuaJIT-2.0.0-beta8, Alexander Gladysh
  • Re: Lua Workshop 2011, start and end times, Ryan Pusztai
  • Re: Lua reference manual sources availability and license., Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: Lua Workshop 2011, start and end times, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • LuaJIT/ARM on other OSs, Gavin Wraith
  • Re: Lua Workshop 2011, start and end times, Alexander Gladysh
  • Re: [ANN] LuaJIT-2.0.0-beta8, Mike Pall
  • Re: LuaJIT/ARM on other OSs, Dimiter "malkia" Stanev
  • Re: LuaJIT/ARM on other OSs, Mike Pall
  • Re: [ANN] LuaJIT-2.0.0-beta8, Josh Haberman
  • Re: LuaJIT/ARM on other OSs, Gavin Wraith
  • Re: LuaJIT/ARM on other OSs, Gavin Wraith
  • Re: LuaJIT without the JIT?, Francesco Abbate
  • Re: LuaJIT without the JIT?, Dimiter "malkia" Stanev
  • Re: LuaJIT/ARM on other OSs, Rob Kendrick
  • Re: LuaJIT/ARM on other OSs, Dimiter "malkia" Stanev
• June 24, 2011
  • Re: [ANN] LuaJIT-2.0.0-beta8, Miles Bader
  • Re: [ANN] LuaJIT-2.0.0-beta8, Zhu Ya Dong
  • Re: [ANN] LuaJIT-2.0.0-beta8, Xavier Wang
  • Lua and other languages compared (pros and cons) [Was: LuaJIT without the JIT?], Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: Lua and other languages compared (pros and cons) [Was: LuaJIT without the JIT?], HyperHacker
  • Re: [ANN] LuaJIT-2.0.0-beta8, HyperHacker
  • Re: LuaJIT without the JIT?, steve donovan
  • Re: LuaJIT without the JIT?, HyperHacker
  • Re: LuaJIT without the JIT?, steve donovan
  • Re: Lua and other languages compared (pros and cons) [Was: LuaJIT without the JIT?], steve donovan
  • Re: LuaJIT without the JIT?, Peter Odding
  • Re: [ANN] LuaJIT-2.0.0-beta8, David Kastrup
  • Re: [ANN] LuaJIT-2.0.0-beta8, Alex Queiroz
  • Re: LuaJIT without the JIT?, steve donovan
  • Re: [ANN] LuaJIT-2.0.0-beta8, steve donovan
  • Re: [ANN] LuaJIT-2.0.0-beta8, David Kastrup
  • Re: [ANN] LuaJIT-2.0.0-beta8, Benoit Germain
  • Re: [ANN] LuaJIT-2.0.0-beta8, Mike Pall
  • Re: [ANN] LuaJIT-2.0.0-beta8, Benoit Germain
  • Re: [ANN] LuaJIT-2.0.0-beta8, Mike Pall
  • Re: SAS to LUA conversion, Patrick Rapin
  • lua license question, Vasiliy G Tolstov
  • Re: SAS to LUA conversion, Joseph Manning
  • Re: lua license question, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: lua license question, Vasiliy G Tolstov
  • Re: lua license question, David Given
  • Re: lua license question, Vasiliy G Tolstov
  • Re: [ANN] LuaJIT-2.0.0-beta8, Benoit Germain
  • Re: [ANN] LuaJIT-2.0.0-beta8, Mike Pall
  • Re: [ANN] lua-pb Lua Protocol Buffers, Matthew Wild
  • Patch for lua-5.2.0-beta-rc2, François Perrad
  • Re: Patch for lua-5.2.0-beta-rc2, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: SAS to LUA conversion, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: SAS to LUA conversion, Alexander Gladysh
  • Re: SAS to LUA conversion, Joseph Manning
  • Re: Patch for lua-5.2.0-beta-rc2, François Perrad
  • Re: SAS to LUA conversion, David Kastrup
  • Re: SAS to LUA conversion, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: SAS to LUA conversion, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: SAS to LUA conversion, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: Patch for lua-5.2.0-beta-rc2, Patrick Donnelly
  • Re: SAS to LUA conversion, Eike Decker
  • _G function inside table, Kev Lugli
  • Re: Lua Workshop 2011, start and end times, Valerio Schiavoni
  • Re: _G function inside table, Patrick Donnelly
  • Re: _G function inside table, Matthew Wild
  • Re: _G function inside table, Gavin Wraith
  • Re: _G function inside table, Matthew Wild
• June 25, 2011
  • Re: _G function inside table, Patrick Donnelly
  • Re: [ANN] lua-pb Lua Protocol Buffers, Robert G. Jakabosky
  • Re: LuaJIT without the JIT?, HyperHacker
  • Re: [ANN] lua-pb Lua Protocol Buffers, Josh Haberman
  • Re: LuaJIT without the JIT?, Robert G. Jakabosky
  • Re: [ANN] lua-pb Lua Protocol Buffers, Robert G. Jakabosky
  • debugger for mac or Linux, Gaspard Bucher
  • Re: debugger for mac or Linux, steve donovan
  • Guidance on how to write this Lua C Binding ?, Jeff Smith
  • Re: Guidance on how to write this Lua C Binding ?, Peter Odding
  • Inspecting argument names, Daurnimator
  • Noob question -- On error, exit function and terminate script, marbux
  • Re: Noob question -- On error, exit function and terminate script, Xavier Wang
  • Re: Noob question -- On error, exit function and terminate script, Rebel Neurofog
  • Re: Noob question -- On error, exit function and terminate script, Gavin Wraith
  • Re: Noob question -- On error, exit function and terminate script, Xavier Wang
  • Re: Noob question -- On error, exit function and terminate script, Timothy Hunter
  • 5.2-beta changes as an annotated reference manual, Peter Cawley
  • Re: Lua Workshop 2011, start and end times, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: 5.2-beta changes as an annotated reference manual, Vadim Peretokin
  • Re: 5.2-beta changes as an annotated reference manual, phlnc8
  • Re: [ANN] lua-pb Lua Protocol Buffers, Josh Haberman
  • Re: Noob question -- On error, exit function and terminate script, Xavier Wang
  • doubt to tolua/tolua++'s tolua_gc table., Xavier Wang
  • Re: Noob question -- On error, exit function and terminate script, steve donovan
  • Re: doubt to tolua/tolua++'s tolua_gc table., steve donovan
  • Re: Noob question -- On error, exit function and terminate script, Xavier Wang
  • Re: Noob question -- On error, exit function and terminate script, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: 5.2-beta changes as an annotated reference manual, Enrico Colombini
  • Re: doubt to tolua/tolua++'s tolua_gc table., Xavier Wang
  • Re: Noob question -- On error, exit function and terminate script, Xavier Wang
  • Re: Noob question -- On error, exit function and terminate script, Rebel Neurofog
  • Re: 5.2-beta changes as an annotated reference manual, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: Noob question -- On error, exit function and terminate script, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: Noob question -- On error, exit function and terminate script, Xavier Wang
  • Re: Noob question -- On error, exit function and terminate script, Florian Weimer
  • Re: Noob question -- On error, exit function and terminate script, marbux
  • Extending assert () functionality, Rebel Neurofog
  • Re: Noob question -- On error, exit function and terminate script, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: Extending assert () functionality, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: 5.2-beta changes as an annotated reference manual, Patrick Rapin
  • Re: Noob question -- On error, exit function and terminate script, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: Extending assert () functionality, Rebel Neurofog
  • Re: 5.2-beta changes as an annotated reference manual, Peter Cawley
  • Re: Extending assert () functionality, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: Noob question -- On error, exit function and terminate script, marbux
  • Re: Extending assert () functionality, Rebel Neurofog
  • 5.2 LUA_HOOKTAILCALL, liam mail
  • Re: Extending assert () functionality, HyperHacker
  • Re: Extending assert () functionality, Rebel Neurofog
  • Re: 5.2-beta changes as an annotated reference manual, Farmbuyer
  • setmetatable from C code, Björn Eiríksson
  • Re: Extending assert () functionality, HyperHacker
  • Re: 5.2-beta changes as an annotated reference manual, HyperHacker
  • Possible enhancements for Lua 5.2, HyperHacker
• June 26, 2011
  • Re: Extending assert () functionality, Rebel Neurofog
  • Re: Possible enhancements for Lua 5.2, Ico Doornekamp
  • Re: Possible enhancements for Lua 5.2, Peter Odding
  • Re: Possible enhancements for Lua 5.2, Andre Leiradella
  • Re: Possible enhancements for Lua 5.2, Wesley Smith
  • Re: Possible enhancements for Lua 5.2, Andre Leiradella
  • Re: Possible enhancements for Lua 5.2, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: Extending assert () functionality, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: lua license question, Christiaan Kras
  • 5.2 luaL_execresult and luaL_fileresult, liam mail
  • RE: Guidance on how to write this Lua C Binding ?, Jeff Smith
  • Re: LuaJIT without the JIT?, Tony Finch
  • Re: LuaJIT without the JIT?, Tony Finch
  • Re: Extending assert () functionality, HyperHacker
  • Re: Possible enhancements for Lua 5.2, HyperHacker
  • A very minor point in the manual, Enrico Colombini
  • Re: Possible enhancements for Lua 5.2, Luis Carvalho
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc2) now available, Tony Finch
  • Re: Possible enhancements for Lua 5.2, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc2) now available, Xavier Wang
  • Re: Possible enhancements for Lua 5.2, steve donovan
  • Re: LuaJIT without the JIT?, David Given
  • How to save bytecode using LuaJIT-2.0.0-beta8?, ss s
  • Re: How to save bytecode using LuaJIT-2.0.0-beta8?, Florian Weimer
  • Re: How to save bytecode using LuaJIT-2.0.0-beta8?, David Given
  • Re: Extending assert () functionality, Rebel Neurofog
  • Re: How to save bytecode using LuaJIT-2.0.0-beta8?, steve donovan
  • Re: Possible enhancements for Lua 5.2, Andre Leiradella
  • Re: Possible enhancements for Lua 5.2, Rebel Neurofog
  • Re: Extending assert () functionality, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: Possible enhancements for Lua 5.2, Andre Leiradella
  • Re: [ANN] LuaJIT-2.0.0-beta8, Benoit Germain
  • Re: Lua file type plug-in for Vim (redux), Marcus Mendes
  • Re: Extending assert () functionality, Rebel Neurofog
  • Re: Possible enhancements for Lua 5.2, Rebel Neurofog
  • Re: Possible enhancements for Lua 5.2, Rebel Neurofog
  • Re: Noob question -- On error, exit function and terminate script, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: [ANN] LuaJIT-2.0.0-beta8, Mike Pall
  • Re: Possible enhancements for Lua 5.2, Andre Leiradella
  • Re: Possible enhancements for Lua 5.2, Rebel Neurofog
  • Re: Possible enhancements for Lua 5.2, Andre Leiradella
  • Re: Possible enhancements for Lua 5.2, Rebel Neurofog
  • In place modification/assignment - A Patch, Ian Millington
• June 27, 2011
  • Re: Possible enhancements for Lua 5.2, GrayFace
  • Re: lua-l Digest, Vol 11, Issue 136, Kev Lugli
  • Re: _G function inside table, Kev Lugli
  • Re: Possible enhancements for Lua 5.2, Andre Leiradella
  • Re: Possible enhancements for Lua 5.2, Wesley Smith
  • Re: Possible enhancements for Lua 5.2, Andre Leiradella
  • Re: Possible enhancements for Lua 5.2, Andre Leiradella
  • Re: In place modification/assignment - A Patch, Robert G. Jakabosky
  • Re: How to save bytecode using LuaJIT-2.0.0-beta8?, ss s
  • Re: How to save bytecode using LuaJIT-2.0.0-beta8?, ss s
  • Re: How to save bytecode using LuaJIT-2.0.0-beta8?, ss s
  • Re: Possible enhancements for Lua 5.2, Gaspard Bucher
  • Re: Possible enhancements for Lua 5.2, steve donovan
  • 5.2 _ENV garbage collection question, Gaspard Bucher
  • Re: 5.2 _ENV garbage collection question, Jerome Vuarand
  • Re: 5.2 _ENV garbage collection question, Xavier Wang
  • Re: 5.2 _ENV garbage collection question, steve donovan
  • Re: 5.2 _ENV garbage collection question, Jerome Vuarand
  • Re: 5.2 _ENV garbage collection question, Xavier Wang
  • Re: 5.2 _ENV garbage collection question, Xavier Wang
  • Re: 5.2 _ENV garbage collection question, Gaspard Bucher
  • Re: 5.2 _ENV garbage collection question, Peter Cawley
  • Re: Possible enhancements for Lua 5.2, Patrick Rapin
  • Re: 5.2 _ENV garbage collection question, Gaspard Bucher
  • Re: Possible enhancements for Lua 5.2, Gaspard Bucher
  • Re: 5.2 _ENV garbage collection question, Peter Cawley
  • Re: 5.2 _ENV garbage collection question, Gaspard Bucher
  • Issue : luajit 2.0 beta7/beta8 with lua_yield/lua_resume on Linux 64 bits, Sylvain Fabre
  • Re: In place modification/assignment - A Patch, liam mail
  • Re: 5.2-beta changes as an annotated reference manual, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: Noob question -- On error, exit function and terminate script, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: Noob question -- On error, exit function and terminate script, Sam Roberts
  • Re: Noob question -- On error, exit function and terminate script, David Kastrup
  • split method?, Dave Collins
  • Re: Noob question -- On error, exit function and terminate script, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • print non-kb characters, Dave Collins
  • Re: Noob question -- On error, exit function and terminate script, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: Noob question -- On error, exit function and terminate script, David Kastrup
  • Re: print non-kb characters, KHMan
  • Re: split method?, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: split method?, Norbert Kiesel
  • Re: split method?, Wesley Smith
  • Re: Issue : luajit 2.0 beta7/beta8 with lua_yield/lua_resume on Linux 64 bits, Mike Pall
  • RE: split method?, Dave Collins
  • RE: print non-kb characters, Dave Collins
  • Re: print non-kb characters, Rob Kendrick
  • Re: print non-kb characters, KHMan
  • Re: split method?, Wesley Smith
  • [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc3) now available, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • RE: print non-kb characters, Dave Collins
  • Re: print non-kb characters, KHMan
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc3) now available, Shmuel Zeigerman
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc3) now available, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • RE: print non-kb characters, Dave Collins
  • Re: In place modification/assignment - A Patch, Joshua Jensen
  • Re: print non-kb characters, KHMan
  • Re: setmetatable from C code, Sean Conner
  • Re: print non-kb characters, David Walker
  • Re: Possible enhancements for Lua 5.2, Sean Conner
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc2) now available, Tony Finch
  • Re: Possible enhancements for Lua 5.2, Shawn Fox
  • Re: Possible enhancements for Lua 5.2, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc2) now available, Dirk Laurie
  • Re: In place modification/assignment - A Patch, Xavier Wang
• June 28, 2011
  • Re: LuaPlus - In place modification/assignment - A Patch, Joshua Jensen
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc3) now available, Ignacio Burgueño
  • Re: Possible enhancements for Lua 5.2, Sean Conner
  • Re: In place modification/assignment - A Patch, Robert G. Jakabosky
  • Re: In place modification/assignment - A Patch, Joshua Jensen
  • Re: Possible enhancements for Lua 5.2, HyperHacker
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc3) now available, HyperHacker
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc3) now available, steve donovan
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc3) now available, steve donovan
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc3) now available, Dirk Laurie
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc3) now available, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc3) now available, HyperHacker
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc3) now available, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc3) now available, David Kastrup
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc3) now available, Patrick Rapin
  • Lua as (Matlab like) calculator, Oscar Chinellato
  • Re: Lua as (Matlab like) calculator, steve donovan
  • Re: Issue : luajit 2.0 beta7/beta8 with lua_yield/lua_resume on Linux 64 bits, Sylvain Fabre
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc3) now available, Stuart P. Bentley
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc3) now available, Jerome Vuarand
  • Re: Possible enhancements for Lua 5.2, Michal Kottman
  • Re: Possible enhancements for Lua 5.2, HyperHacker
  • Re: print non-kb characters, Philippe Lhoste
  • Re: split method?, Philippe Lhoste
  • Re: Possible enhancements for Lua 5.2, Shawn Fox
  • Re: Possible enhancements for Lua 5.2, steve donovan
  • Re: Possible enhancements for Lua 5.2, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc3) now available, Ignacio Burgueño
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc3) now available, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc3) now available, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc3) now available, Tomas Guisasola Gorham
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc3) now available, Alexandre Rion
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc3) now available, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc3) now available, Xavier Wang
  • Re: Possible enhancements for Lua 5.2, David Kastrup
  • Re: Possible enhancements for Lua 5.2, James Graves
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc3) now available, Dirk Laurie
  • RE: split method?, Dave Collins
  • RE: split method?, Dave Collins
  • RE: split method?, Michal Kottman
  • Butialo: a Lua IDE for the Butiá robot, and Lua for kids., Jorge
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc3) now available, David Given
  • Re: Lua as (Matlab like) calculator, Dirk Laurie
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc3) now available, David Kastrup
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc3) now available, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc3) now available, Xavier Wang
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc3) now available, Renato Maia
  • Re: Possible enhancements for Lua 5.2, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc3) now available, phlnc8
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc3) now available, Lorenzo Donati
  • [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc4) now available, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc4) now available, Ignacio Burgueño
  • Plea for the support of unicode escape sequences, Edgar Toernig
  • Re: Plea for the support of unicode escape sequences, Rebel Neurofog
  • Re: Extend the arithmetic expressions parser from lpeg example, Christophe Jorssen
  • Re: Plea for the support of unicode escape sequences, Dirk Laurie
  • Re: [ANN] LuaJIT-2.0.0-beta8, Mike Pall
  • Re: Plea for the support of unicode escape sequences, Edgar Toernig
  • Re: Plea for the support of unicode escape sequences, Ico
  • Re: Plea for the support of unicode escape sequences, Florian Weimer
  • Re: Plea for the support of unicode escape sequences, Rebel Neurofog
  • Re: *** GMX Spamverdacht *** Re: Plea for the support of unicode escape sequences, Edgar Toernig
  • 5.2: equality for closures, Alexander Gladysh
  • Re: 5.2: equality for closures, Peter Cawley
  • Re: Plea for the support of unicode escape sequences, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: 5.2: equality for closures, Peter Cawley
  • Re: Plea for the support of unicode escape sequences, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: 5.2: equality for closures, Alexander Gladysh
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc4) now available, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: 5.2: equality for closures, Peter Cawley
  • Re: 5.2: equality for closures, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: Plea for the support of unicode escape sequences, Edgar Toernig
  • Re: 5.2: equality for closures, Sean Conner
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc4) now available, HyperHacker
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc4) now available, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: *** GMX Spamverdacht *** Re: Plea for the support of unicode escape sequences, marbux
• June 29, 2011
  • Re: 5.2: equality for closures, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: Possible enhancements for Lua 5.2, TNHarris
  • Re: Plea for the support of unicode escape sequences, Tom N Harris
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc4) now available, Miles Bader
  • Re: Possible enhancements for Lua 5.2, Andre Leiradella
  • Re: Plea for the support of unicode escape sequences, Xavier Wang
  • Re: Plea for the support of unicode escape sequences, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: Plea for the support of unicode escape sequences, David Given
  • Re: Plea for the support of unicode escape sequences, Sean Conner
  • Re: 5.2: equality for closures, Sean Conner
  • Lua 5.2 sequence definition - clarification needed, Lorenzo Donati
  • Lua 5.2 - small enhancement for table.unpack, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: 5.2: equality for closures, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: *** GMX Spamverdacht *** Re: Plea for the support of unicode escape sequences, Dirk Laurie
  • Re: 5.2: equality for closures, steve donovan
  • TIOBE and mailing list stats in the last 6 month, Gaspard Bucher
  • Re: *** GMX Spamverdacht *** Re: Plea for the support of unicode escape sequences, steve donovan
  • Re: 5.2: equality for closures, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc4) now available, Matthew Wild
  • Re: TIOBE and mailing list stats in the last 6 month, Alexander Gladysh
  • Re: Lua 5.2 - small enhancement for table.unpack, Daurnimator
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc4) now available, steve donovan
  • Re: Lua 5.2 - small enhancement for table.unpack, Patrick Rapin
  • Re: Lua 5.2 - small enhancement for table.unpack, steve donovan
  • Re: Lua 5.2 - small enhancement for table.unpack, Matthew Wild
  • Re: Lua 5.2 - small enhancement for table.unpack, steve donovan
  • Re: split method?, Valerio Schiavoni
  • Re: Lua 5.2 - small enhancement for table.unpack, Dirk Laurie
  • Re: 5.2: equality for closures, Gé Weijers
  • Re: TIOBE and mailing list stats in the last 6 month, Ignacio Burgueño
  • Re: 5.2: equality for closures, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: Lua as (Matlab like) calculator, Dirk Laurie
  • OT(slightly): parser generator for expression with custom operators, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: OT(slightly): parser generator for expression with custom operators, steve donovan
  • Re: Lua 5.2 sequence definition - clarification needed, James Graves
  • Re: Lua 5.2 - small enhancement for table.unpack, Lorenzo Donati
  • RE: OT(slightly): parser generator for expression with custom operators, Thomas Buergel
  • Re: OT(slightly): parser generator for expression with custom operators, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: OT(slightly): parser generator for expression with custom operators, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: Lua 5.2 sequence definition - clarification needed, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: OT(slightly): parser generator for expression with custom operators, steve donovan
  • Changing tables during traversal: clearing and re-adding a field, Dirk Feytons
  • Re: OT(slightly): parser generator for expression with custom operators, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: Changing tables during traversal: clearing and re-adding a field, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: Changing tables during traversal: clearing and re-adding a field, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: OT(slightly): parser generator for expression with custom operators, Luis Carvalho
  • RE: OT(slightly): parser generator for expression with custom operators, Thomas Buergel
  • Re: OT(slightly): parser generator for expression with custom operators, Wesley Smith
  • Re: Plea for the support of unicode escape sequences, David Kolf
  • Re: Plea for the support of unicode escape sequences, Marc Balmer
  • Re: Plea for the support of unicode escape sequences, Mike Pall
  • Re: split method?, Etan Reisner
  • Re: Plea for the support of unicode escape sequences, Louis Mamakos
  • Re: Plea for the support of unicode escape sequences, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: OT(slightly): parser generator for expression with custom operators, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: Plea for the support of unicode escape sequences, Petite Abeille
  • Re: split method?, Norbert Kiesel
  • Re: OT(slightly): parser generator for expression with custom operators, Dirk Laurie
  • Re: Plea for the support of unicode escape sequences, Petite Abeille
  • Re: split method?, Etan Reisner
  • Re: Plea for the support of unicode escape sequences, Dirk Laurie
  • Re: Possible enhancements for Lua 5.2, Alex Queiroz
  • Re: Plea for the support of unicode escape sequences, David Kolf
  • Re: Plea for the support of unicode escape sequences, Petite Abeille
  • Re: Changing tables during traversal: clearing and re-adding a field, Dirk Feytons
  • Re: Plea for the support of unicode escape sequences, Patrick Rapin
  • Re: OT(slightly): parser generator for expression with custom operators, Luis Carvalho
  • Re: Plea for the support of unicode escape sequences, Lorenzo Donati
  • uservalue from Lua, Gaspard Bucher
  • Re: Plea for the support of unicode escape sequences, Edgar Toernig
  • Re: Plea for the support of unicode escape sequences, Petite Abeille
  • Re: Plea for the support of unicode escape sequences, Petite Abeille
  • Re: Lua 5.2 sequence definition - clarification needed, David Kastrup
  • Re: 5.2 luaL_execresult and luaL_fileresult, liam mail
  • Re: Lua 5.2 sequence definition - clarification needed, Sam Roberts
  • Re: OT(slightly): parser generator for expression with custom operators, Sam Roberts
• June 30, 2011
  • Howto: Linking LuaJIT with MSCRT.DLL, Dimiter "malkia" Stanev
  • Re: OT(slightly): parser generator for expression with custom operators, Ross Berteig
  • Re: Howto: Linking LuaJIT with MSCRT.DLL, Dimiter "malkia" Stanev
  • Re: Changing tables during traversal: clearing and re-adding a field, Rebel Neurofog
  • Re: Lua 5.2 - small enhancement for table.unpack, Daurnimator
  • Re: Plea for the support of unicode escape sequences, David Given
  • Re: Plea for the support of unicode escape sequences, KHMan
  • Re: Plea for the support of unicode escape sequences, David Given
  • Re: Lua 5.2 - small enhancement for table.unpack, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: Lua 5.2 sequence definition - clarification needed, Javier Guerra Giraldez
  • Re: Lua 5.2 sequence definition - clarification needed, Lorenzo Donati
  • Is it possible to disable function arguments evaluation?, Han Zhao
  • tostring(): vararg in, vararg out?, Pierre-Yves Gérardy
  • Re: Is it possible to disable function arguments evaluation?, Rebel Neurofog
  • Re: Is it possible to disable function arguments evaluation?, David Kolf
  • Re: tostring(): vararg in, vararg out?, steve donovan
  • Re: Plea for the support of unicode escape sequences, Philippe Lhoste
  • Re: Changing tables during traversal: clearing and re-adding a field, Philippe Lhoste
  • Re: Lua as (Matlab like) calculator, Oscar Chinellato
  • Re: Is it possible to disable function arguments evaluation?, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: Plea for the support of unicode escape sequences, Matthew Frazier
  • Re: Plea for the support of unicode escape sequences, Jim Whitehead II
  • Re: Lua as (Matlab like) calculator, steve donovan
  • Re: Plea for the support of unicode escape sequences, David Given
  • Re: Changing tables during traversal: clearing and re-adding a field, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: Changing tables during traversal: clearing and re-adding a field, Rebel Neurofog
  • Re: Changing tables during traversal: clearing and re-adding a field, Enrico Colombini
  • Re: Changing tables during traversal: clearing and re-adding a field, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: tostring(): vararg in, vararg out?, Javier Guerra Giraldez
  • Re: Plea for the support of unicode escape sequences, Javier Guerra Giraldez
  • Re: Plea for the support of unicode escape sequences, steve donovan
  • Re: tostring(): vararg in, vararg out?, Renato Maia
  • Re: tostring(): vararg in, vararg out?, steve donovan
  • Re: uservalue from Lua, Gaspard Bucher
  • Re: Changing tables during traversal: clearing and re-adding a field, Rebel Neurofog

---

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19