[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available
- From: David Kastrup <dak@...>
- Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:27:08 +0200
Your quoting style is quite unusual, hard to read and to followup
without lots of editing.
"H. Diedrich" <hd2010@eonblast.com> writes:
> David Kastrup schrieb:
>>
>> * Xavier Wang:
>>
>> in beta:
>> The present implementation makes #t well-defined and equal to
>> n if all its positive integer keys comprise the set {1..n}.
>> That would not be a problem.
>>
>>
>> You are using "present implementation" and "well-defined" in a
>> nonsensical combination. It's like trying to have your cake recipe
>> and eat it too.
>
> Just that that is the problem. The recipe is showing in the cake.
As it should when done by a faithful cook. But the cake should stay out
of the recipe.
--
David Kastrup
- References:
- [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
- Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Peter Cawley
- Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Lorenzo Donati
- Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Lorenzo Donati
- Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Xavier Wang
- Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Lorenzo Donati
- Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Xavier Wang
- Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Florian Weimer
- Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Dirk Laurie
- Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, David Kastrup
- Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, H. Diedrich