|
On 15/06/2011 11.46, Miles Bader wrote:
Maybe something like ::label:: or :label: might be good -- very visible, but still less "heavy feeling" than "@".
I like @ because it means "at" (this point) and I find :: more confusing than @ because of its similarity with ';' and because of common ':' usage in syntax. My inner parser would get confused for a bit longer :-)
I think labels should stand out because they can affect control flow in non-obvious ways.
-- Enrico