[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available
- From: Alexandre Rion <gaumerie@...>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 23:00:22 +0200
+1 for @foo
IMO, this is the most representative one, this is the symbol that has the
closer signification for this use
-----Message d'origine-----
From: Roberto Ierusalimschy
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 7:29 PM
To: Lua mailing list
Subject: Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available
Right now we have a proposal, with code, which works, which is blessed
by the Lua developers. So I suggest that we stick with that.
Particularly since the *developers* are the ones making the decisions
here, and not us.
Plus, I suspect that right now they're entirely sick of everyone
bickering over GOTO label syntax when they'd much rather get feedback on
the rest of the stuff in the beta...
Thanks :)
This time, however, we would like feedback about the syntax for labels,
because of the small incompatibility of the '@' with filenames. (Note
that "local name" and anything similar that mixes gotos with variables
is not a *syntax* for labels and is completely out of our plans.)
Some real contenders:
1) keep all as it is
2) change the indication of filenames in debug info and in LUA_INIT
3) ::label::
4) |name|
5) &name:
6) !name:
we are also considering to enforce a single occurence of a label name in
each function, to avoid ambiguities. (That does not change the visbility
rules; it is only an extra restriction.)
Of course we need feedback on the rest of the stuff, too!
-- Roberto