On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 18:12, Lorenzo Donati
<lorenzodonatibz@interfree.it> wrote:
On 24/06/2011 13.29, Joseph Manning wrote:
On 2011-Jun-24 (Fri) at 13:17 (+0200), Patrick Rapin wrote:
Naw, there's a much simpler explanation -- the original poster
just had an unfortunate Lua Uppercase Accident :-)
Wonderful!!! I think this qualifies as the winner for "The Best Retronym for
LUA" contest!!!! :-D
I agree! That gem is definitely worth to remember for the next time.
(But we, as a community, are not very friendly to the OP, that's not
good. Someone should at least explain what just happened. ;-) )