 |
lua-l archive |
|
|
||
|
You should be very careful before diagnosing a mental condition from email. In other words, don't...
On 28 April 2013 19:00, Coda Highland <chighland@gmail.com> wrote:
It's still an ad hominem attack, focusing on a (perceived orOn Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Greg Lewin <greg.lewin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 28 April 2013 18:25, Coda Highland <chighland@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Greg Lewin <greg.lewin@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On 28 April 2013 18:15, steve donovan <steve.j.donovan@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Coda Highland <chighland@gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Whether or not the subject is a troll, there's no reason to be
>> >>> stooping to namecalling and ad hominem attacks. Let's show some
>> >>> maturity here.
>> >>>
>> >> Absolutely, let's move on. And nothing justifies using large font HTML
>> >> in
>> >> emails ;)
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > well, your last line wrt maturity could be seen as ad hominem in itself.
>> >
>> > But more importantly, he is making major claims and being quite
>> > immoderate
>> > in his language in doing so (and showing clear signs of a manic state).
>> >
>> > afaics there are two main categories of troll - the malicious and the
>> > ill; I
>> > am merely pointing out that he looks very like the second variety,
>> > recognising that may save time in the long run, and I don't see much
>> > point
>> > in pretending otherwise.
>> >
>> > I don't see why anyone needs to be patient with or polite to the
>> > malicious
>> > sort, for that matter.
>> >
>> > (I did not realize I was coming through large, my apologies).
>>
>> (You're stil coming through quite large, looks like about 18pt.)
>>
>> No one ever said you have to be patient or polite to malicious
>> individuals, but it's rather immature to go out of one's way to deride
>> someone (for any reason!) on a development mailing list.
>>
>> /s/ Adam
>>
>
>
>
> it's not derision (that is your view); it is recognition.
>
> https://www.google.com/search?q=%0D%0Amanic%20state
>
otherwise) flaw in the individual instead of discussing the points of
the topic at hand.
/s/ Adam
I guess you still don't understand. The fact that he is in a manic state is very relevant to the scope of claims he has made earlier.I have to hit the road now, will not be online for a while.