[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Makefile vs LUA_PATH inconsistency
- From: Dirk Laurie <dirk.laurie@...>
- Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 09:00:56 +0200
2014-05-21 8:27 GMT+02:00 steve donovan <steve.j.donovan@gmail.com>:
> I do have the usual Unix tools available on Windows, separately
> installed
DJ Delorie's? How memories suddenly rush back! Dual boot DOS and
Yggdrasil Linux using LILO. Windows 3.3. is sitting in its box on the
shelf, tried it once and didn't like it.
And to think earliest Lua was already available, only nobody knew.
- References:
- Makefile vs LUA_PATH inconsistency, Thijs Schreijer
- Re: Makefile vs LUA_PATH inconsistency, Dirk Laurie
- RE: Makefile vs LUA_PATH inconsistency, Thijs Schreijer
- Re: Makefile vs LUA_PATH inconsistency, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
- Re: Makefile vs LUA_PATH inconsistency, Ulrich Schmidt
- RE: Makefile vs LUA_PATH inconsistency, Thijs Schreijer
- Re: Makefile vs LUA_PATH inconsistency, Philipp Janda
- RE: Makefile vs LUA_PATH inconsistency, Thijs Schreijer
- Re: Makefile vs LUA_PATH inconsistency, Philipp Janda
- RE: Makefile vs LUA_PATH inconsistency, Thijs Schreijer
- Re: Makefile vs LUA_PATH inconsistency, Philipp Janda
- RE: Makefile vs LUA_PATH inconsistency, Thijs Schreijer
- Re: Makefile vs LUA_PATH inconsistency, Philipp Janda
- Re: Makefile vs LUA_PATH inconsistency, steve donovan