Re: [OT] Interesting answer to why dynamic languages are hard for large code bases

lua-l archive

Subject: Re: [OT] Interesting answer to why dynamic languages are hard for large code bases
From: Roberto Waltman <techie@...>
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2014 23:46:51 -0400

On 07/01/2014 13:56, Coda Highland wrote:

: http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Haskell_in_industry

This one caught my eye:
"Qualcomm uses Haskell to generate Lua bindings to the BREW platform"

https://developer.brewmp.com/resources/reference/qualcomm-interface-definition-language-reference

-- 
Roberto Waltman

References:
- [OT] Interesting answer to why dynamic languages are hard for large code bases, Andrew Starks
- Re: [OT] Interesting answer to why dynamic languages are hard for large code bases, Marc Balmer
- Re: [OT] Interesting answer to why dynamic languages are hard for large code bases, Aaron B.
- Re: [OT] Interesting answer to why dynamic languages are hard for large code bases, Philippe Lhoste
- Re: [OT] Interesting answer to why dynamic languages are hard for large code bases, Pierre Chapuis
- Re: [OT] Interesting answer to why dynamic languages are hard for large code bases, Javier Guerra Giraldez
- Re: [OT] Interesting answer to why dynamic languages are hard for large code bases, Coda Highland