[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: From Lua to Python?
- From: Petri Häkkinen <petrih3@...>
- Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 11:28:02 +0300
> On 13.7.2017, at 16.48, Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@majumdar.org.uk> wrote:
>
>
> Actually OO is essential tool for organizing large code bases. I am
> not talking about inheritance and all - but just the ability to
> organize your code into objects of different types.
This is such a common fallacy that it's giving me the shivers. For example take a look at Linux source code for a very large codebase written by very large team without OO.
I think that the 20 years I spent in OO land was a terrible mistake. OOP leads into overarchitecting, poor performance (too much focus on small individual objects rather than data flow) and longer development times (design paralysis).
Petri
- References:
- Re: From Lua to Python?, Dibyendu Majumdar
- Re: From Lua to Python?, Dibyendu Majumdar
- Re: From Lua to Python?, Dirk Laurie
- Re: From Lua to Python?, Dibyendu Majumdar
- Re: From Lua to Python?, Javier Guerra Giraldez
- Re: From Lua to Python?, Dibyendu Majumdar
- Re: From Lua to Python?, Enrico Colombini
- Re: From Lua to Python?, steve donovan
- Re: From Lua to Python?, Javier Guerra Giraldez
- Re: From Lua to Python?, steve donovan
- Re: From Lua to Python?, Dibyendu Majumdar